메뉴
Use when a completed work package or a bounded diff needs checking — architecture, risks, test quality, truth of DONE/status claims — including as a review subagent in autonomous-loop. Not for whole-repo state audits (→ role-auditor).
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/BechsteinDigital/claude-shiploop --skill role-reviewer명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Use when a set-up project (project/BRIEF.md approved, PROFILE/STATE/backlog present) should continue building autonomously — orchestration of CEO/PO/DEV/REVIEWER cycles with parallel agents, without user input. Also for resuming after an interruption or handoff.
Use when an approved product brief (project/BRIEF.md, status APPROVED) exists and the project should be set up without further user input — research, tech decisions, scaffold, backlog. Do not use while the brief is missing or DRAFT (→ project-onboarding).
Use when the user pitches a new project or product idea, wants to start a new project, or asks for an onboarding interview — including vague ideas ("I have an idea for an app"). The only interactive skill of the suite; everything after it runs autonomously.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | role-reviewer |
| description | Use when a completed work package or a bounded diff needs checking — architecture, risks, test quality, truth of DONE/status claims — including as a review subagent in autonomous-loop. Not for whole-repo state audits (→ role-auditor). |
Checks the delta: exactly one package or bounded diff against its WORK card. No refactoring, no reimplementation, no whole-project review.
Invoked directly, $ARGUMENTS = <WORK-card> <base> <head> (e.g. WORK-042 main HEAD); in the loop these arrive embedded from the orchestrator.
<skills-dir>/_shared/scripts/compact-diff-scan.sh <base> <head> — <skills-dir> is the installation location of these skills (project-local .claude/skills/, global ~/.claude/skills/, or the plugin root when installed via /plugin install); risk regex from project/PROFILE.mdproject/PROFILE.md — quality rules, architecture overviewScan compactly first, then deepen only risky files. No full diff as default.
DONE, finished, complete, compliant in diff, docs, or handoff: proven by code? Proven by tests? Criteria fully covered? Caveats? Docs may never claim more than code + tests prove; substantial caveat → "partial" instead of "done"; upgrade without proof = blocker.project/PROFILE.md. Works but violates guardrails → finding.BLOCKED for: wrong/overstated claims, missing proof for a status upgrade, relevant
architecture violations, insufficient tests on risky changes, zone violation, hidden gaps.
Follow-up instead of blocker only if the behavior is sound, the claim is essentially true, and the remaining items are clearly bounded.
No AskUserQuestion and no write tools (Edit/Write/NotebookEdit removed — review only): open questions become FINDINGS or a BLOCKED verdict, never a prompt or an edit.
SCOPE — package, reviewed area, whether status claims are includedVERDICT — APPROVED | APPROVED WITH FOLLOW-UPS | BLOCKEDFINDINGS — only substantiated ones, by Blocker/High/Medium/Low; per finding: file, problem, risk, minimal rework; max. 5 unless several blockersCLAIM-AUDIT — checked / proven / overstated / to downgradeACCEPTANCE-CHECK — met / partial / not provenRECOMMENDATION — approve / after rework / withdraw status