Guides the design of a skill that works independently with no dependencies on other skills. Ensures the skill is self-contained, well-scoped, and useful in isolation.
원문 언어: 영어
메뉴
이 저장소의 skills
SkillsMP는 benjam3n/reasoningtool에서 655개의 skill을 수집했습니다. skill을 열어 소스와 세부 정보를 확인하세요.
benjam3n/reasoningtool수집된 skill 655개 중 40개를 표시합니다.
Guides the design of a skill that works independently with no dependencies on other skills. Ensures the skill is self-contained, well-scoped, and useful in isolation.
원문 언어: 영어
For when you have a goal but genuinely don't know where to begin. Find the zero-dependency starting point and take it.
원문 언어: 영어
Expand implications of a statement so the hidden conclusions are explicit, ordered by depth, and flagged by impact and testability.
원문 언어: 영어
Real problems exist in complex systems with many interacting parts. Comprehensive system modeling ontology.
원문 언어: 영어
Analyze any system by mapping components, connections, feedback loops, leverage points, and emergent behaviors.
원문 언어: 영어
Analyze feedback loops, emergent behavior, system dynamics, stocks and flows, and leverage points. See the system, not just the parts.
원문 언어: 영어
Identify unresolved decisions in any plan, document, or conversation, and convert each into an explicit determination question with type, owner, deadline, and cost of remaining unresolved.
원문 언어: 영어
Orderings driven by temporal constraints, deadlines, and timing requirements.
원문 언어: 영어
Explains any concept so that someone can actually understand it. Uses the Feynman technique — simple words, clear structure, no hiding behind jargon.
원문 언어: 영어
Sub-orchestrator for domain-specific questions. Routes to specialized skills based on domain and task type.
원문 언어: 영어
Design and run effective group sessions that produce clear outcomes, manage group dynamics, and keep participants engaged.
원문 언어: 영어
Meta-skill for choosing the right thinking approach. Identifies what type of thinking is needed, selects the appropriate framework, applies it, and evaluates output quality.
원문 언어: 영어
Assess structural integrity of a collection, system, or toolkit. Finds broken references, orphans, circular dependencies, and naming inconsistencies.
원문 언어: 영어
Analyzes something from the team perspective. Identifies composition, roles, communication patterns, coordination costs, and collaboration synergies.
원문 언어: 영어
Specific, tested tactics for navigating the most common value tensions and conflicts.
원문 언어: 영어
Generate valid execution sequences from dependencies. Respects hard constraints, optimizes for priorities, and identifies parallel execution opportunities.
원문 언어: 영어
Sequence unresolved TBDs by dependency and impact for operational resolution, identifying parallel tracks, blockers, and the critical resolution path.
원문 언어: 영어
Arguments form dependency graphs. When any assumption's truth value changes, propagate through all dependent conclusions.
원문 언어: 영어
Registry for domain templates. Store, retrieve, search, and manage domain-specific configurations.
원문 언어: 영어
Rapidly sorts multiple problems, tasks, or issues by urgency and importance into a priority matrix with a ranked action list.
원문 언어: 영어
Assess trust dynamics — who trusts whom, on what dimensions (competence, integrity, benevolence), what would build or erode trust, and how trust asymmetries create organizational dysfunction.
원문 언어: 영어
Universalize - Extract the complete space of assumptions, dimensions, and alternatives from any claim. Map before you judge. Track every finding.
원문 언어: 영어
UAUA Combined Exploration - Universalize, ARAW, loop, synthesize. Map possibilities with numbered findings, test rigorously with numbered claims, compile a complete registry, derive synthesis only from the registry.
원문 언어: 영어
Given a skill or method, map its best-fit use cases, failure conditions, limits, and alternative skills with explicit switch conditions.
원문 언어: 영어
The comprehensive question framework v5 — adds operational, meta-cognitive, and quality categories. Consolidated from ugav2-v5.
원문 언어: 영어
Goal analysis focused on generating fact-yielding questions. Each question must produce a testable fact, not a vague reflection. Consolidated into /uga but usable standalone for question-focused goal analysis.
원문 언어: 영어
Goal analysis with fully decomposed sub-procedures. Every analysis step is broken into atomic operations that can be followed mechanically. Consolidated into /uga but usable standalone for procedural goal decomposition.
원문 언어: 영어
Goal analysis emphasizing leverage identification and stakeholder communication. Finds where small effort produces big results and maps who needs to know what. Consolidated into /uga but usable standalone.
원문 언어: 영어
Goal analysis adding operational load assessment, meta-cognitive sustainability, and quality validation categories. Catches goals that are analytically sound but operationally unsustainable. Consolidated into /uga but usable standalone.
원문 언어: 영어
Analyzes an under-served area to determine what it needs. Assesses current coverage, identifies gaps relative to demand, and recommends build order.
원문 언어: 영어
Diagnose why you're blocked and get concrete unblocking actions based on the type of block: information gap, decision paralysis, emotional block, skill gap, or wrong approach.
원문 언어: 영어
For mild uncertainty — you have a direction but aren't confident. A decision tree to move from hesitation to action or justified pause.
원문 언어: 영어
Tests whether a claim, principle, or method works across all contexts. Finds the true scope of applicability and states boundary conditions.
원문 언어: 영어
Find non-obvious solutions. Three layers — obvious, unexpected, reframed — using disruption techniques that force the search off its default path.
원문 언어: 영어
Every output must be unassailable. Nothing wrong with form, content, length, logic, precision, completeness, or necessity.
원문 언어: 영어
Identify cognitive operations that don't have explicit procedures yet. Observes thinking processes, surfaces implicit steps and tacit knowledge, formalizes them into explicit procedures, tests, and refines.
원문 언어: 영어
Discover what users actually need versus what they say they need. Observes behavior, identifies pain points, maps workarounds, traces root desires, validates with evidence, and outputs a need hierarchy.
원문 언어: 영어
Reason about what someone actually needs based on what they said. Surfaces underlying needs, unstated constraints, and what would truly satisfy the request.
원문 언어: 영어
Systematically construct and examine the best possible outcome — what would ideal actually look like, and what would it take to get there?
원문 언어: 영어
For any obvious strategy, ask what if we did the exact opposite. Counters the tendency to accept first-good-enough answers.
원문 언어: 영어