메뉴
Summarize a GitHub pull request — purpose, key changes, review state, CI status, and outstanding blockers. Use when the user pastes a PR URL (github.com/<org>/<repo>/pull/<n>), references a PR by number (e.g. "PR
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/Blazemeter/claude-base --skill summarize-pr명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Use when a team wants to apply the Constraint Engineering guideline to a feature or repo — audits the current repo against an 8-item build checklist (spec-first, small checked steps, right-sized models, fast checks, an independent reviewer, isolated workspaces, hard safety rules, tracked outcomes), and generates copy-ready, stack-adapted template files. Trigger phrases — "apply constraint engineering", "help me write a spec for this feature", "audit this repo against the constraint engineering checklist", "set up an independent AI reviewer", "is this repo AI-SDLC S2 or S3 ready".
Produce a Design Rationale section for a design/spec/architecture artifact — justifying OOP/SOLID application, which design pattern(s) were considered and chosen (or why none applies), and which collection/data-structure was picked for each non-trivial data need, with the complexity/performance tradeoff that justifies it. Asks the developer clarifying questions when a structural choice (concurrency, cardinality, mutability, ordering, hot-path-vs-cold-path) is a genuine judgment call, rather than guessing. Language-agnostic — works for Java, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, or any other stack. Use whenever a pipeline is about to lock in a design/spec for non-trivial work (new module, service, class hierarchy, data pipeline), or when a developer explicitly asks for a design/architecture review, "why this data structure", or "apply SOLID/design patterns here". Do NOT use for one-line fixes or purely mechanical changes with no structural decisions to make.
File or update a documentation-planning JIRA task for a customer-facing feature, using the documentation team's standard template. Idempotent create-or-update — safe to run early (draft a DOC-ready ticket from the specs/design to guide development) and again at finalize (reconcile the description against what was actually shipped). For FEATURE or USER-FACING work the skill first asks once whether the change needs customer-facing documentation, and only creates the ticket if it does. Also use when a developer explicitly asks to "create a doc task", "file a docs ticket", "DOC-ready ticket", "update the doc task", or hand work off to the documentation team. Do NOT use for pure refactors, internal-only fixes, or build/dependency chores.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | summarize-pr |
| description | Summarize a GitHub pull request — purpose, key changes, review state, CI status, and outstanding blockers. Use when the user pastes a PR URL (github.com/<org>/<repo>/pull/<n>), references a PR by number (e.g. "PR |
| allowed-tools | Bash(gh *), Read |
| effort | low |
Produce a concise, structured summary of a GitHub pull request. The goal is to let the user decide what to do about the PR without opening the browser — purpose, scope, review state, blockers, recommendation.
https://github.com/<org>/<repo>/pull/123.gh CLI installed and authenticated. If gh auth status fails, tell the user to run gh auth login and stop.gh token must have repo access.Resolve the PR identifier.
<org>/<repo> and number from /<org>/<repo>/pull/<n>.#<n> or PR <n> → run gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner to get current repo. If the user is not in a git repo, ask which repo they mean.Fetch metadata in one call.
gh pr view <n> --repo <org>/<repo> --json \
number,title,author,state,isDraft,mergeable,reviewDecision,additions,deletions,changedFiles,body,reviews,statusCheckRollup,comments,headRefName,baseRefName
Fetch the diff, bounded.
gh pr diff <n> --repo <org>/<repo> | head -500
If changedFiles > 30 or additions + deletions > 1500, skip the full diff — list filenames instead and call out the size.
Identify blockers.
reviewDecision == "CHANGES_REQUESTED" → list each "REQUEST_CHANGES" review with its body.statusCheckRollup entry with conclusion != "SUCCESS" and not in ["SKIPPED", "NEUTRAL"] → name the check.mergeable == "CONFLICTING" → flag the merge conflict.Produce the summary in the exact format below.
## PR #<num> — <title>
- **Author:** @<author> · **State:** <state><draft-tag> · **Branch:** `<head>` → `<base>`
- **Size:** +<additions>/-<deletions> across <N> files
- **Review:** <reviewDecision> · <N approvals> · <N changes requested> · <N unresolved threads>
- **CI:** <N passing> · <N failing> · <N pending>
## Purpose
<One paragraph from PR body, or "(empty)" if no description>
## Key changes
- <Bullet per meaningful change. Group small file edits. Reference exact file paths.>
## Outstanding concerns
<Numbered list of blockers. If none, write "None — this PR has no blocking issues.">
## Recommendation
<One of: "Ready to merge", "Needs <comma-separated blockers>", "Discussion needed", "Draft — not yet ready for review">
gh pr view JSON output to the user — extract the fields and present the summary above.….