메뉴
이 저장소의 skills
SkillsMP는 brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills에서 3,969개의 skill을 수집했습니다. skill을 열어 소스와 세부 정보를 확인하세요.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills수집된 skill 3,969개 중 40개를 표시합니다.
Use when positioning an AAMAS submission against multiagent, game-theory, and reinforcement-learning literature spread across AAMAS, AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and JAAMAS, including arXiv and workshop versions, concurrent submissions, prior conference…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when strengthening AAMAS reproducibility evidence for interaction claims, including proofs and game definitions, opponent and population sets, self-play protocols, random seeds, compute, uncertainty on strategic outcomes, baselines, and consistency…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when auditing an AAMAS main-track submission for OpenReview readiness, the 8-page-plus-references limit, the full-paper versus 2-page extended-abstract choice, double-blind anonymity, the supplementary zip cap, track fit across the AAAI/JAAMAS/Blue Sky…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing AAMAS supplementary material - proofs, extended game and mechanism definitions, extra multiagent experiments, opponent-set details, and the anonymized artifact zip - under the size cap, anonymity, and reviewer-discretion limits, including…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAMAS fit, comparing AAMAS with AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and the JAAMAS journal, identifying whether the agents are truly the research object, naming the interaction primitive (solution concept,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when planning an AAMAS project timeline from venue fit through abstract, full-paper or extended-abstract upload, supplementary material, the double-blind rebuttal, decision, IFAAMAS camera-ready, registration, and presentation, with track-specific…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when revising an AAMAS paper so the interaction contribution leads the first page, the solution concept or incentive property is named, the game and agents are legible, claims are paired with proofs or multiagent experiments, the argument fits eight…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when packaging code, data, prompts, model outputs, and annotation materials for an EACL submission, first as an anonymized ACL Rolling Review supplement aligned with the Responsible NLP checklist, then as a public post-acceptance ACL Anthology release,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the meta-review, answer NLP objection patterns, run in-window experiments, flag deficient…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing an EACL or Findings-of-ACL-EACL camera-ready after commitment acceptance, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization, AI-assistance disclosure, satisfying the meta-review's required changes, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when positioning an EACL paper against fast-moving NLP literature, covering ACL-Anthology-first citation, correct Findings attribution, handling concurrent preprints fairly, freshness sweeps across recent *ACL rounds and European venues like LREC-COLING,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting, data-contamination stance, variance and significance reporting, multilingual coverage…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main versus Findings versus reject, ethics escalation, confidentiality, and when to…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when auditing an EACL submission before its single ACL Rolling Review cycle deadline, covering ACL-template compliance, the 8-page long / 4-page short content caps, the mandatory Limitations section, the Responsible NLP checklist, anonymization, preprint…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when organizing an EACL paper's body, mandatory Limitations section, appendices, and anonymized supplementary archive so that no decision-critical content hides where ACL Rolling Review reviewers are not obliged to read, and so the content-page budget…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding whether a project is EACL-shaped or better routed to ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, AACL, TACL, Computational Linguistics, LREC-COLING, COLM, or an ML venue, covering the long-versus-short choice, the accept-Findings calculus, and how EACL's single ARR…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when planning an EACL project timeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering the single viable ARR cycle with no fallback, backward planning from the one deadline, the rebuttal window, the commitment decision to EACL, notification, and camera-ready through…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when revising an EACL paper's prose for a task-first first page, a concrete page-one example, scoped LLM-era claims, quantified error analysis, an anonymity-safe voice, honest Limitations, and compression into the 8-page long or 4-page short content…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when packaging an ESEC/FSE artifact for the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme (Artifacts Available, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced), covering what SIGSOFT evaluators check first, DOI-issuing archives, evaluator-proof…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when drafting ESEC/FSE author responses, covering the initial-review rebuttal and — distinctively — the journal-style Major Revision response letter that must stay double-anonymous, map every reviewer request to a concrete tracked change, and survive…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing an accepted ESEC/FSE paper for its PACMSE camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the ACM Primary Article Template and PACMSE journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, CCS concepts), integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when designing or auditing ESEC/FSE empirical evaluations, covering real subject systems, fair baselines, SE-standard statistics and effect sizes, qualitative and mixed-methods rigor, contamination-aware LLM ablations, provenance for mining studies, and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when positioning an ESEC/FSE submission against the software-engineering literature across ICSE, FSE, ASE, ISSTA, MSR, and the SE journals (EMSE, TSE, TOSEM), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when strengthening ESEC/FSE reproducibility and open-science evidence, covering the Data Availability statement, anonymized-but-runnable artifacts, provenance pinning for mining and LLM studies, claim-to-evidence mapping, honest degrees of…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when reasoning about how an ESEC/FSE research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous "heavy" review, the at-least-three-reviewer PC model, the Accept / Major Revision / Reject decision categories, the journal-style revise-and-resubmit round of…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when auditing an ESEC/FSE research-track submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the mandatory paper-registration step, the ACM Primary Article Template page budget, double-anonymous "heavy" anonymity, the open-science Data Availability statement,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding whether a software-engineering project belongs at ESEC/FSE or should be routed to ICSE, ASE, ISSTA, MSR, ICSME, or an SE journal (EMSE/TSE/TOSEM), and when distinguishing FSE from its sibling general-SE flagship ICSE by contribution shape,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when planning an ESEC/FSE project timeline from venue fit through paper registration, submission, the journal-style Major Revision round, artifact evaluation, PACMSE camera-ready, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets for an empirical-SE paper…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when revising an ESEC/FSE paper for a practitioner-grounded software-engineering contribution on the first page, research-question contracts, a threats-to-validity section that argues rather than recites, evidence proportional to the claim,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when packaging an ISSTA tool, benchmark, and results for the artifact-evaluation track, covering the ACM badges (Artifacts Available via Zenodo, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced), the anonymous review-time copy, containerization, a…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window or planning a Major-Revision resubmission, covering evidence-anchored replies, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject outcome model, converting reviewer asks into a revision ledger, anonymity in the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing an accepted ISSTA paper for the ACM Digital Library camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the final ACM sigconf layout without the review/anonymous options, ACM rights forms and DOI, metadata and CCS concepts, the artifact DOI and badge…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when designing or auditing ISSTA experiments, covering real subject programs and benchmarks like Defects4J, fair tool-baseline configuration, bug-finding and coverage metrics, non-parametric comparison with effect sizes, equal-budget protocols, repeated…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when positioning an ISSTA submission against the testing and analysis literature, covering the sibling venues (ICSE, FSE, ASE, ICST, PLDI, CAV), delta-first framing against the nearest technique, double-anonymous self-citation, distinguishing the closest…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when strengthening ISSTA reproducibility and verifiability evidence, covering pinned subject programs and benchmark versions, random seeds and timeout budgets, non-determinism disclosure for fuzzing and analysis, claim-to-evidence traceability, tool…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when explaining or planning around ISSTA peer review, covering double-anonymous reviewing, at least three PC reviews, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject outcome model, the phase-two major-revision resubmission, the named evaluation criteria, how the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when auditing an ISSTA submission for HotCRP readiness, the 18-page (excluding references) limit, ACM sigconf plus review and anonymous formatting, double-anonymous integrity, the January deadline, artifact intent, track choice among…
원문 언어: 영어