메뉴
이 저장소의 skills
SkillsMP는 brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills에서 3,969개의 skill을 수집했습니다. skill을 열어 소스와 세부 정보를 확인하세요.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills수집된 skill 3,969개 중 40개를 표시합니다.
Use when responding to Cancer Cell (Cell Press) reviewer reports — planning new experiments, writing a point-by-point response, and calibrating claims for revision. It structures the rebuttal and revision; it does not run the experiments or design them from…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when assembling STAR Methods and the Key Resources Table for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript, and when ensuring rigor / reproducibility (cell-line authentication, mycoplasma, antibody validation, ARRIVE animal reporting, data/code deposition). It…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when polishing prose for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript — the Summary/Introduction/Results/Discussion craft, claim calibration, and Cell Press nomenclature/house style. It edits language and framing; it does not design experiments or build figures.
원문 언어: 영어
Use to convert references to Cell Press author–date style — in-text "(Smith et al., 2021)", an alphabetical reference list by first author with full author lists, journal names spelled out. This is the OPPOSITE of Science's numbered-by-appearance style.
원문 언어: 영어
Use to finalize Cell Press display items — column-width sizing, minimum fonts, RGB, show-the-data with defined error bars/n/replicate type, scale bars, colorblind-safe palettes, multi-panel discipline, stand-alone legends, and image integrity.
원문 언어: 영어
Use to produce the three signature Cell front-matter artifacts — Highlights (3–4 bullets, each ≤85 characters), the eTOC/In Brief blurb (~50 words, third-person), and the Graphical Abstract (single-panel visual summary). Late-stage polish.
원문 언어: 영어
Use as the final preflight before submitting to Cell — a complete checklist across significance, narrative, Highlights/eTOC/Graphical Abstract, Summary, figures, STAR Methods, data, references, and required files. Bundles the checklist and cover-letter…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to write Cell's Summary — a single unstructured paragraph of ≤ ~150 words that conveys the complete story, the mechanism, and the broad significance, quantified and readable by a general life-scientist. Late-stage polish.
원문 언어: 영어
Use when sharpening the conservation significance and actionable implications of a Conservation Biology manuscript. The journal requires results to have direct, transferable implications for conserving biological diversity and to bridge science and practice.…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to understand how Conservation Biology evaluates a manuscript — double-blind peer review (adopted 2014), editorial screening for scope/novelty/conservation relevance, the editorial-board structure, decision categories, and the Registered Reports route.…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Conservation Biology via Wiley's ScholarOne Manuscript Central — article-type selection, double-blind preparation, word/abstract caps, Style Guide formatting, data-availability statement, and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use as the entry point for any Conservation Biology manuscript. Routes to the right conbio sub-skill based on where you are in the science lifecycle and which article type (Contributed Paper, Research Note, Review, Essay, Conservation Practice and Policy,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when drafting or polishing a Conservation Biology manuscript so it reads accessibly for a broad conservation audience, follows the journal Style Guide, and fits the per-type word caps (e.g., Contributed Papers ~6,000–7,000; abstract <= 300 words).…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to forge the central argument of a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay into a genuine intervention. CI rewards a bold claim that reorients a conversation in criticism and theory, with stakes that cross disciplines — not a competent reading, a survey, or a method…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to format a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay's references and figures to journal standard — Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.) footnotes numbered consecutively, no works-cited list, with all bibliographical information carried in the notes (and counted toward…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to choose and read the objects a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay analyzes — texts, images, artworks, films, performances, events, or cases. In CI the "evidence" is not data but objects read closely through theory; this skill helps select objects that test and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding whether a project fits Critical Inquiry (CI) and which format to target. CI is the leading interdisciplinary journal of criticism and theory in the arts and humanities, associated with no single school and tied to no single discipline; the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use as the entry point for any Critical Inquiry (CI) essay. Routes to the right CI sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which format (Article, Critical Response, Review) fits. CI is an interdisciplinary journal of criticism and theory in the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when designing or writing the heterogeneity section of an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) manuscript — choosing which dimensions to cut, justifying each cut theoretically, presenting subsample results with coefficient-difference tests, and wiring at…
원문 언어: 중국어
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of an Economic-Research manuscript. Frames implications at the significance / institutional level rather than the actionable / ministry level used by Management-World.
원문 언어: 중국어
Use when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes, prioritizing 编委…
원문 언어: 중국어
Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of an 《经济研究》 manuscript — eliminating empty-significance phrases, fixing vague policy talk, replacing method-flexing with mechanism, and aligning tense / person / hedging with CSSCI house style.…
원문 언어: 중국어
Use when an Economic-Research manuscript is at the topic-selection stage and the theoretical grounding, marginal-contribution sentence, or venue match are unsettled. Produces the contribution-sentence template and the theoretical-grounding checklist.
원문 언어: 중국어
Use when deciding which er-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
원문 언어: 중국어
Use when the "what does this advance in game theory?" sentence is missing or muddy for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript. Forges the single-sentence contribution and the introduction's claim structure so the Editor in Charge sees the advance…
원문 언어: 영어
Use after a Games and Economic Behavior revise-and-resubmit to organize responses on theory novelty, equilibrium/proof details, experiments, simulations, Editor-in-Charge priorities, and Elsevier revision files.
원문 언어: 영어
Use when planning data and code sharing for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript. GEB encourages but does NOT mandate a replication archive — unlike AER/Econometrica/JAE — so this skill helps you share well voluntarily and avoid assuming…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when building exhibits for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript — payoff matrices, extensive-form game trees, equilibrium/result tables, and experimental plots. Makes strategic structure and results readable to a game-theory audience.
원문 언어: 영어
Use when polishing prose, abstract, and introduction for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript so the model and result land for a general game-theory reader. Enforces the 250-word abstract cap and elsarticle conventions. Polishes exposition; it does…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when stress-testing a Mind argument by raising the strongest objections and constructing replies. At a top analytic-philosophy journal, anticipating and answering the best objection is much of the contribution — referees are expert and will supply the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when responding to a Mind decision — a revise-and-resubmit, a reject-with-encouragement, or referee reports to address before resubmitting. The response must answer expert philosophical objections without weakening the thesis, while keeping the manuscript…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when organizing a Mind article so the argument unfolds in the clearest possible order within the ~8,000-word limit. The job is architecture, not prose polish — a roadmap, the right order of premises, signposting, and a conclusion that claims exactly what…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when building the central argument of a Mind article — stating a sharp thesis and constructing a valid, sound argument for it. This is the core of an analytic-philosophy paper: explicit premises, a valid inference to the conclusion, and defensible…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding whether a philosophy project fits Mind and which content type (article, discussion, book review, critical notice) to target. Mind takes quality as the sole criterion and excludes no area, style, or school, so the test is the significance and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to confirm clinical ethics and research-integrity requirements for an NEJM submission — IRB/ethics-committee approval and informed consent per the Declaration of Helsinki, ICMJE conflict-of-interest disclosures and authorship criteria, the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to build NEJM clinical display items correctly — Table 1 baseline characteristics by group (with standardized differences, not P values), Kaplan-Meier curves with numbers-at-risk, forest plots for subgroups and meta-analyses, and the CONSORT participant…
원문 언어: 영어
Use this first, before any writing, to stress-test whether a clinical study clears NEJM's bar — practice-changing clinical impact, methodological rigor, and generalizability. Decides NEJM vs Lancet/JAMA vs a specialty journal.
원문 언어: 영어
Use to select and enforce the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a clinical study headed to NEJM — CONSORT for RCTs (with the participant flow diagram), STROBE for observational, PRISMA for systematic reviews — and to build the required checklist and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to enforce NEJM's clinical statistical reporting — confidence intervals over bare P values, the pre-specified intention-to-treat primary analysis, multiplicity control for secondary endpoints, pre-specified subgroups with interaction tests, missing-data…
원문 언어: 영어
Use to structure and tighten an NEJM Original Article into terse IMRAD — short main text (~2700 words), limited references, claim-first results, and a sober discussion with explicit limitations and calibrated clinical implications. Enforces NEJM's plain,…
원문 언어: 영어