메뉴
이 저장소의 skills
SkillsMP는 brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills에서 3,969개의 skill을 수집했습니다. skill을 열어 소스와 세부 정보를 확인하세요.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills수집된 skill 3,969개 중 40개를 표시합니다.
Use when building exhibits for a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) manuscript — event-study and DiD displays, condition-contrast tables, subgroup forest plots, and stimuli exhibits that a policy reader can act on. Builds the exhibits; it does not…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when building the conceptual backbone of a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) manuscript — theorizing why a policy lever changes marketplace behavior, for whom, and with what unintended effects. Builds the theory of the lever; it does not design…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when testing whether a research question is policy-first enough for the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M), and which of its domains and paper shapes it fits, before design and data are locked. Settles fit and outlet; it does not build the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding which jppm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) submission. Routes to the specialized skills — it does not do their work.
원문 언어: 영어
Use when drafting or revising the prose of a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) manuscript — the policy-problem-led introduction, the 200-word abstract, dual-audience clarity, and the evidence-not-advocacy voice. Polishes the writing; it does not…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing the accountability artifacts that accompany an ACM FAccT paper — datasheets for datasets, model cards, data statements, audit and impact-assessment documentation, and released code/data — since FAccT's culture centers documentation and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing an accepted ACM FAccT paper for camera-ready — de-anonymizing and adding the withheld Positionality/Acknowledgements statements, switching to the acmart sigconf proceedings format, ACM metadata (DOI, ORCID, CCS concepts, rights), the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when designing or auditing ACM FAccT empirical work — quantitative fairness audits with disaggregated metrics and fair baselines, qualitative and participatory studies with coding and reflexivity, mixed-methods designs, sound handling of protected…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when positioning an ACM FAccT submission across its many disciplinary lanes — algorithmic fairness/ML, HCI, law and policy, STS and critical theory, and prior FAccT/FAT* proceedings — writing delta-first contrast that a mixed reviewer pool will accept,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when strengthening ACM FAccT transparency and reproducibility — releasing code, data, and analysis for quantitative audits; documenting datasets and models with datasheets, model cards, and data statements; making qualitative and participatory work…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when reasoning about how an ACM FAccT submission is evaluated — mutually-anonymous review by a mixed CS+law+social-science pool matched via author-selected focus areas, Area Chairs, the short factual-correction rebuttal, the new Accept/Revise/Reject…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when auditing an ACM FAccT submission for OpenReview readiness — the mandatory abstract-registration gate with focus-area selection, the acmart anonymous/review PDF, the 14-page (+1 endmatter) budget, mutual anonymity, the required Generative AI Usage…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM FAccT paper body versus its endmatter statements, appendices, and supplementary material — the 14-page acmart budget, the extra endmatter page for ethics/adverse-impacts statements, the rule that decision-critical…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding whether a responsible-AI project belongs at ACM FAccT or should route to a pure-ML venue (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR), an HCI venue (CHI/CSCW), a law/policy venue, or an AI-ethics venue (AIES), by testing whether fairness, accountability, or…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when planning an ACM FAccT project timeline from venue fit through abstract registration, OpenReview submission, the rebuttal window, the new Accept/Revise/Reject revise-and-resubmit round, two-round camera-ready, and in-person presentation, with…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when revising an ACM FAccT paper so that a fairness/accountability/transparency contribution is legible on the first page to a mixed CS+law+social-science reviewer pool, claims are scoped to who is affected, limitations and harms are argued rather than…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing the "artifact" of an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) paper, which at a pure-theory venue is the complete-proofs full version rather than a code package — covering why ICDT has no ACM-style artifact-badging or…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when responding to ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) referees — principally the first-cycle Revise-and-resubmit round, where you return a corrected paper that closes each identified proof gap, plus any short author-comment phase, keeping…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when preparing the final LIPIcs camera-ready for an accepted ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) paper — the lipics-v2021 final document, mandatory ACM CCS concepts and keywords, author ORCIDs, de-anonymization, complete proofs and the…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations, and, only for papers with…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when positioning an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) paper against the database-theory literature — covering the ICDT/PODS lineage, finite model theory and complexity, delta-first positioning against the nearest prior theorem, honest…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when strengthening the verifiability of an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) paper — the theory-venue analogue of reproducibility — covering complete and self-contained proofs, exact models and assumptions, claim-to-proof mapping,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when reasoning about how an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) submission is evaluated, covering the two-submission-cycle model, the first-cycle revision (Accept / Revise / Reject) decision, anonymous review since 2024, the cross-cycle…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when auditing an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) regular-paper submission for Microsoft CMT readiness, covering the two-step abstract-then-paper deadline in the correct submission cycle, the lipics-v2021 15-page limit excluding…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding how to split an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) paper between the 15-page lipics-v2021 body and the clearly-marked appendix that referees read at their discretion, given that online/external appendices are not allowed and…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when deciding whether a database-theory project belongs at ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) or should be routed to PODS, the co-located EDBT systems track, a pure-TCS venue (LICS, ICALP, STACS), or a journal (ACM TODS, LMCS, TheoretiCS),…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when planning an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) campaign end to end, running the two-submission-cycle calendar backward from a chosen cycle deadline through abstract registration, the first-cycle revision round, LIPIcs camera-ready,…
원문 언어: 영어
Use when shaping the prose of an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) paper — the theorem-proof structure, stating the data model and computation model precisely, leading with the result and its data-management consequence,…
원문 언어: 영어
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 稿件准备代码与数据可用性材料、判断本刊是否设有独立制品评审(artifact evaluation)徽章制度时调用。讲清本刊现状(以同行评议为主、无独立徽章制度的现况为待核实)、如何主动提供匿名可复现的代码/数据以增强说服力、控制仿真与实物实验制品的组织，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿在 Acta Automatica Sinica 外审中用可用制品提升可信度。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在收到《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的外审意见、需要撰写退修说明与逐条答复信时调用。给出逐条对应审稿意见的答复结构、修改对照(改前→改后)、大修/小修的不同策略、对分歧意见的礼貌据理回应、保持双盲的匿名口径、以及按编辑部期限组织修改稿，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的多轮退修与重新送审中最大化被录用的机会。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在稿件被《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 录用后、需要完成定稿、清样校对、补齐署名与基金、按本刊体例排版并处理稿酬与出版排期时调用。覆盖录用后从匿名稿恢复作者信息、套用本刊定稿模板、中英文摘要与参考文献终校、校样(清样)逐处核对、样刊与稿酬安排，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 见刊前把清样打磨到零差错并理解稿酬与出版流程。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 设计与呈现实验、仿真或实物验证时调用。覆盖研究问题(RQ)驱动的实验设计、公平基线与对照、控制类的稳定性/收敛性/鲁棒性分析、模式识别类的指标与统计显著性、消融实验、仿真与实物平台的报告要素，帮助为控制理论、机器人、智能系统方向的中文稿搭建经得起 Acta Automatica Sinica 双盲外审的实证与理论证据链。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 撰写相关工作、文献综述或确立创新性(delta)时调用。给出以差异为先的文献组织法、控制/自动化/模式识别方向代表作的覆盖策略、与最接近工作的对比表、避免"重复前人/无新意"初审退稿的自检，以及综述栏目所需的分类框架与批判性评价方法，帮助在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的中英文双语与综述长文传统下清晰界定本文相对已有研究的增量。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 提升实验可复现性、组织复现包、防范数据污染时调用。覆盖环境与依赖固定、随机种子与多次运行、数据划分与防泄露、控制仿真的求解器/步长/系统参数记录、超参数与调参协议披露、以及配合双盲的匿名化复现材料，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿在 Acta Automatica Sinica 外审中经得起"结果能否复现"的追问。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在需要理解《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的双盲三审制审稿流程、各环节时间进度与作者可施加的杠杆时调用。建模编辑初审→双盲外审→退修/复审(多轮)→主编终审的完整链路，说明作者承诺前置、双盲对作者的约束、退修期限与重新送审、状态查询，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的评审各节点做出正确动作、管理预期并避免流程性失误。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在向《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 aas.net.cn 的 ScholarOne 投审稿系统(aas-cn)、双盲匿名化(删除页眉页脚/标题下方/尾注/文件名中的作者单位基金号)、全部作者签名加盖第一作者单位公章的《作者承诺》前置提交、只收原创非翻译稿与不接收 AI 署名、学术不端查重、栏目(综述/论文/短文)归属与退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿打磨到符合本刊双盲三审制门槛的场景。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 组织正文与附录/补充材料、决定哪些内容进正文哪些进附录时调用。给出按"决定性"划分正文与附录的原则、冗长证明与额外仿真的安置、补充材料/多媒体附件的组织与命名、以及配合双盲的匿名化，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文长文在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的篇幅与体例约束下保持正文紧凑而证据完整。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 确定选题、判断稿件是否契合本刊控制与自动化学科定位、以及在综述/论文/短文三类栏目间定位时调用。帮助辨析本刊与兄弟中文刊(计算机学报/软件学报/电子学报/计算机研究与发展/计算机科学)的学科分工，评估创新性与贡献可数性，避免"主题超范围""无新意""重复前人"等初审退稿理由，并把选题打磨到匹配 Acta Automatica Sinica 的控制/模式识别/机器人/智能系统侧重与中英文双语综述长文传统。
원문 언어: 중국어
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 规划一次完整投稿的时间线、把 12 个技能编排成从选题到见刊的流水线时调用。给出选题定位→写作→实验→匿名投稿→双盲三审→多轮退修→录用定稿的阶段划分、每阶段的准入准出、里程碑与常见延误点，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的双盲三审制与中英文双语综述长文传统下合理排期，避免作者承诺漏交、双盲泄露、退修超期等踩坑，并在每个节点指明应调用哪个 aas- 技能。
원문 언어: 중국어