Skip to main content

workflow-multi-cli-plan

Multi-CLI collaborative planning with codebase context gathering, iterative cross-verification, and execution handoff.

소스 정보

저장소
catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
최근 소스 활동
2026년 5월 14일 15:44
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
2,131
포크
166

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
workflow-multi-cli-plan
description
Multi-CLI collaborative planning with codebase context gathering, iterative cross-verification, and execution handoff.
allowed-tools
Skill, Agent, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
# Multi-CLI Collaborative Planning ## Auto Mode When `workflowPreferences.autoYes` is true: Auto-approve plan, use recommended solution and execution method (Agent, Skip review). **Context Source**: ACE semantic search + Multi-CLI analysis **Output Directory**: `.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/` **Default Max Rounds**: 3 (convergence may complete earlier) **CLI Tools**: @cli-discuss-agent (analysis), @cli-lite-planning-agent (plan generation) **Execution**: Auto-hands off to workflow-lite-execute after plan approval ### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL) - **ONLY command** for multi-CLI collaborative planning - Manages: Session state, user decisions, agent delegation, phase transitions - Delegates: CLI execution to @cli-discuss-agent, plan generation to @cli-lite-planning-agent ### Execution Flow ``` Phase 1: Context Gathering └─ ACE semantic search, extract keywords, build context package Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion (Iterative, via @cli-discuss-agent) ├─ Round N: Agent executes Gemini + Codex + Claude ├─ Cross-verify findings, synthesize solutions ├─ Write synthesis.json to rounds/{N}/ └─ Loop until convergence or max rounds Phase 3: Present Options └─ Display solutions with trade-offs from agent output Phase 4: User Decision ├─ Select solution approach ├─ Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto) ├─ Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Codex/Agent) └─ Route: ├─ Approve → Phase 5 ├─ Need More Analysis → Return to Phase 2 └─ Cancel → Save session Phase 5: Plan Generation & Execution Handoff ├─ Generate plan.json + .task/*.json (via @cli-lite-planning-agent, two-layer output) ├─ Build executionContext with user selections and taskFiles └─ Execute via workflow-lite-execute ``` ### Agent Roles | Agent | Responsibility | |-------|---------------| | **Orchestrator** | Session management, ACE context, user decisions, phase transitions, executionContext assembly | | **@cli-discuss-agent** | Multi-CLI execution (Gemini/Codex/Claude), cross-verification, solution synthesis, synthesis.json output | | **@cli-lite-planning-agent** | Task decomposition, two-layer output: plan.json (overview with task_ids[]) + .task/*.json (task files) | ## Core Responsibilities ### Phase 1: Context Gathering **Session Initialization**: ```javascript const sessionId = `MCP-${taskSlug}-${date}` const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/${sessionId}` Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/rounds`) ``` **ACE Context Queries**: ```javascript const aceQueries = [ `Project architecture related to ${keywords}`, `Existing implementations of ${keywords[0]}`, `Code patterns for ${keywords} features`, `Integration points for ${keywords[0]}` ] // Execute via mcp__ace-tool__search_context ``` **Context Package** (passed to agent): - `relevant_files[]` - Files identified by ACE - `detected_patterns[]` - Code patterns found - `architecture_insights` - Structure understanding ### Phase 2: Agent Delegation **Core Principle**: Orchestrator only delegates and reads output — NO direct CLI execution. CLI calls MUST use `Bash` with `run_in_background: true`, wait for hook callback, do NOT use `TaskOutput` polling. **Agent Invocation**: ```javascript Agent({ subagent_type: "cli-discuss-agent", run_in_background: false, description: `Discussion round ${currentRound}`, prompt: ` ## Input Context - task_description: ${taskDescription} - round_number: ${currentRound} - session: { id: "${sessionId}", folder: "${sessionFolder}" } - ace_context: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage)} - previous_rounds: ${JSON.stringify(analysisResults)} - user_feedback: ${userFeedback || 'None'} - cli_config: { tools: ["gemini", "codex"], mode: "parallel", fallback_chain: ["gemini", "codex", "claude"] } ## Execution Process 1. Parse input context (handle JSON strings) 2. Check if ACE supplementary search needed 3. Build CLI prompts with context 4. Execute CLIs (parallel or serial per cli_config.mode) 5. Parse CLI outputs, handle failures with fallback 6. Perform cross-verification between CLI results 7. Synthesize solutions, calculate scores 8. Calculate convergence, generate clarification questions 9. Write synthesis.json ## Output Write: ${sessionFolder}/rounds/${currentRound}/synthesis.json ## Completion Checklist - [ ] All configured CLI tools executed (or fallback triggered) - [ ] Cross-verification completed with agreements/disagreements - [ ] 2-3 solutions generated with file:line references - [ ] Convergence score calculated (0.0-1.0) - [ ] synthesis.json written with all Primary Fields ` }) ``` **Read Agent Output**: ```javascript const synthesis = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/rounds/${round}/synthesis.json`)) // Access top-level fields: solutions, convergence, cross_verification, clarification_questions ``` **Convergence Decision**: ```javascript if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'converged') { // Proceed to Phase 3 } else if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'user_input_needed') { // Collect user feedback, return to Phase 2 } else { // Continue to next round if new_insights && round < maxRounds } ``` ### Phase 3: Present Options Display solutions from `synthesis.solutions[]` showing: name, source CLIs, effort/risk, pros/cons, affected files (`file:line`). Also show cross-verification agreements/disagreements count. ### Phase 4: User Decision ```javascript AskUserQuestion({ questions: [ { question: "Which solution approach?", header: "Solution", multiSelect: false, options: solutions.map((s, i) => ({ label: `Option ${i+1}: ${s.name}`, description: `${s.effort} effort, ${s.risk} risk` })).concat([ { label: "Need More Analysis", description: "Return to Phase 2" } ]) }, { question: "Execution method:", header: "Execution", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" }, { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" }, { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" } ] }, { question: "Code review after execution?", header: "Review", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Skip", description: "No review" }, { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" }, { label: "Codex Review", description: "Codex CLI: prompt-based code quality review (--mode analysis)" }, { label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" } ] } ] }) ``` **Routing**: - Approve + execution method → Phase 5 - Need More Analysis → Phase 2 with feedback - Cancel → Save session for resumption **TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 Decision)**: ```javascript const executionLabel = userSelection.execution_method // "Agent" / "Codex" / "Auto" TodoWrite({ todos: [ { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "completed", activeForm: "Gathering context" }, { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "completed", activeForm: "Running discussion" }, { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "completed", activeForm: "Presenting options" }, { content: `Phase 4: User Decision [${executionLabel}]`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Decision recorded" }, { content: `Phase 5: Plan Generation [${executionLabel}]`, status: "in_progress", activeForm: `Generating plan [${executionLabel}]` } ]}) ``` ### Phase 5: Plan Generation & Execution Handoff **Step 1: Build Context-Package** (Orchestrator responsibility): ```javascript const contextPackage = { solution: { name: selectedSolution.name, source_cli: selectedSolution.source_cli, feasibility: selectedSolution.feasibility, effort: selectedSolution.effort, risk: selectedSolution.risk, summary: selectedSolution.summary }, implementation_plan: selectedSolution.implementation_plan, dependencies: selectedSolution.dependencies || { internal: [], external: [] }, technical_concerns: selectedSolution.technical_concerns || [], consensus: { agreements: synthesis.cross_verification.agreements, resolved_conflicts: synthesis.cross_verification.resolution }, constraints: userConstraints || [], task_description: taskDescription, session_id: sessionId } Write(`${sessionFolder}/context-package.json`, JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2)) ``` **Step 2: Invoke Planning Agent**: ```javascript Agent({ subagent_type: "cli-lite-planning-agent", run_in_background: false, description: "Generate implementation plan", prompt: ` ## Schema Reference Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/task-schema.json ## Output Format: Two-Layer Structure - plan.json: Overview with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files (NO tasks[] array) - .task/TASK-*.json: Independent task files following task-schema.json plan.json required: summary, approach, task_ids, task_count, _metadata (with plan_type) Task files required: id, title, description, depends_on, convergence (with criteria[]) Task fields: files[].change (not modification_points), convergence.criteria (not acceptance), test (not verification) ## Context-Package (from orchestrator) ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2)} ## Execution Process 1. Read plan-overview-base-schema.json + task-schema.json for output structure 2. Read project-tech.json and specs/*.md 3. Parse context-package fields: - solution: name, feasibility, summary - implementation_plan: tasks[], execution_flow, milestones - dependencies: internal[], external[] - technical_concerns: risks/blockers - consensus: agreements, resolved_conflicts - constraints: user requirements 4. Use implementation_plan.tasks[] as task foundation 5. Preserve task dependencies (depends_on) and execution_flow 6. Expand tasks with convergence.criteria (testable completion conditions) 7. Create .task/ directory and write individual TASK-*.json files 8. Generate plan.json with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files ## Output - ${sessionFolder}/plan.json (overview with task_ids[]) - ${sessionFolder}/.task/TASK-*.json (independent task files) ## Completion Checklist - [ ] plan.json has task_ids[] and task_count (NO embedded tasks[]) - [ ] .task/*.json files preserve task dependencies from implementation_plan - [ ] Task execution order follows execution_flow - [ ] Key_points reflected in task descriptions - [ ] User constraints applied to implementation - [ ] convergence.criteria are testable - [ ] plan.json follows plan-overview-base-schema.json - [ ] Task files follow task-schema.json ` }) ``` **Step 3: Build executionContext**: ```javascript const plan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`)) const taskFiles = plan.task_ids.map(id => `${sessionFolder}/.task/${id}.json`) // Build executionContext (same structure as lite-plan) executionContext = { planObject: plan, taskFiles: taskFiles, // Paths to .task/*.json files (two-layer format) explorationsContext: null, // Multi-CLI doesn't use exploration files explorationAngles: [], explorationManifest: null, clarificationContext: null, // Store user feedback from Phase 2 if exists executionMethod: userSelection.execution_method, // From Phase 4 codeReviewTool: userSelection.code_review_tool, // From Phase 4 originalUserInput: taskDescription, executorAssignments: null, session: { id: sessionId, folder: sessionFolder, artifacts: { explorations: [], // No explorations in multi-CLI workflow explorations_manifest: null, plan: `${sessionFolder}/plan.json`, task_dir: plan.task_ids ? `${sessionFolder}/.task/` : null, synthesis_rounds: Array.from({length: currentRound}, (_, i) => `${sessionFolder}/rounds/${i+1}/synthesis.json` ), context_package: `${sessionFolder}/context-package.json` } } } ``` **Step 4: Hand off to Execution**: ```javascript Skill({ skill: "workflow-lite-execute", args: "--in-memory" }) // executionContext is passed via global variable to workflow-lite-execute (Mode 1: In-Memory Plan) ``` ## synthesis.json Schema ```json { "round": 1, "solutions": [{ "name": "Solution Name",
GitHub에서 보기
이 SKILL.md는 매우 커서 SkillsMP가 여기에는 첫 섹션만 미리 보여줍니다. GitHub에서 보기