- name
- sampling-strategies
- description
- Use when selecting sampling strategies for qualitative research — purposeful, theoretical, snowball, criterion, maximum variation.
# Sampling Strategies in Qualitative Research
Qualitative sampling prioritizes **information-rich cases** and **analytic progression** over statistical representativeness. Your sampling chapter should explain logic, not pretend to randomize for generalization in a positivist sense.
## Purposeful sampling (Patton)
Purposeful sampling selects cases that illuminate the phenomenon intensely. Common variants:
- **Maximum variation:** Deliberately include diverse contexts to surface core patterns and boundaries.
- **Homogeneous:** Deepen understanding within a similar subset when noise reduction helps early theory.
- **Typical case:** Clarify the “usual” pattern when stakeholders misunderstand extremes.
- **Critical case:** A instance that can falsify or strongly test an emerging claim.
- **Criterion:** All participants meet explicit inclusion criteria tied to the research question.
- **Snowball/chain:** Referrals lead to new participants; efficient for hidden populations.
## Theoretical sampling (Glaser)
After initial coding, **theoretical sampling** seeks data to elaborate **properties, dimensions, conditions, and consequences** of emerging categories. You sample for **analytic gaps**, not demographic quotas (unless demographics are theoretically relevant). The question is: “What data do I need next to develop this category?”
## Snowball and chain referral sampling
Use when populations are hard to reach or trust is network-based. Mitigate bias from seed participants by using **multiple entry points** and monitoring whose voices dominate. Document referral chains in audit materials.
## Maximum variation vs typical case
Maximum variation guards against **provincial theory**; typical case helps communicate **mundane patterning**. In GT, these are tools in service of emergent categories—choose based on what the evolving theory demands.
## Convenience sampling (with caveats)
Convenience sampling is acceptable only when limitations are **transparent** and you take compensatory steps (prolonged engagement, triangulation, negative case search). Never dress convenience up as theoretical sampling without analytic justification.
## Sample size in qualitative research
“How many?” depends on **study scope, data richness, and saturation**. A focused GT project may achieve workable saturation with fewer cases if incidents are dense; a comparative multi-site study may need many more. Report **saturation reasoning** and **disconfirming efforts**, not a fake power analysis.
## Saturation-based sampling
Saturation means **no new properties/dimensions** are emerging for a category (in the Glaserian sense), not mere repetition of wordings. Track saturation **by category**, not only globally—some categories saturate early while others remain thin.
## Integration tip
In proposals, distinguish **initial purposeful sampling** (who can get you started) from **later theoretical sampling** (who/what you need next as categories form). This shows methodological maturity in GT.
## Checklist
- [ ] Sampling logic matches methodology (purposeful vs theoretical).
- [ ] Inclusion/exclusion criteria explicit and ethically justified.
- [ ] Referral/snowball bias considered and mitigated where possible.
- [ ] Saturation tracked with documented negative case searches.
- [ ] Limitations of non-probability sampling frankly acknowledged.
## References (starting points)
- Patton, M. Q. *Qualitative research and evaluation methods* — purposeful sampling typology.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. *The Discovery of Grounded Theory* — theoretical sampling origins.
- Emmel, N. *Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research*.
GitHub에서 보기