| name | managing-coderabbit |
| description | Use when working with Coderabbit — codeRabbit AI code review management
including automated review comments, auto-suggestions, review customization,
and learning from feedback. Use when configuring CodeRabbit for AI-assisted
code review, custom review rules, and automated suggestion workflows.
|
| connection_type | coderabbit |
| preload | false |
Managing CodeRabbit
Overview
Manage CodeRabbit AI-powered code review, including automated review comments, contextual suggestions, review customization, and feedback learning to improve review quality over time.
Key Capabilities
- Automatically review PRs with AI-generated comments and suggestions
- Configure review focus areas (security, performance, style, bugs)
- Customize review rules and coding standards
- Learn from reviewer feedback to reduce false positives
- Generate PR summaries and walkthrough comments
- Integrate with GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps
Workflow
1 — Review Configuration
REVIEW SETTINGS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[ ] Review scope:
[ ] All PRs automatically
[ ] PRs with @coderabbitai mention
[ ] PRs targeting specific branches: ___
[ ] Review focus areas:
[ ] Bug detection
[ ] Security vulnerabilities
[ ] Performance issues
[ ] Code style and best practices
[ ] Error handling
[ ] Documentation completeness
[ ] Review depth: superficial / standard / thorough
2 — Custom Instructions
CUSTOM REVIEW RULES (.coderabbit.yaml)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
reviews:
profile: assertive / chill
path_instructions:
- path: "src/api/**"
instructions: |
Review for REST API best practices.
Check error handling and status codes.
Verify input validation.
- path: "src/db/**"
instructions: |
Check for SQL injection risks.
Verify index usage for queries.
Review transaction handling.
auto_review:
enabled: true
ignore_title_keywords:
- "WIP"
- "DO NOT MERGE"
drafts: false
3 — Feedback Learning
FEEDBACK CONFIGURATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[ ] Learn from resolved/dismissed comments: YES / NO
[ ] Thumbs up/down feedback tracking: YES / NO
[ ] Suppress repeated false positives: YES / NO
[ ] Custom knowledge base: YES / NO
[ ] Team-specific review patterns: YES / NO
Common Operations
Review Analytics
Track AI review accuracy, accepted suggestions, and false positive rates.
Rule Tuning
Adjust custom instructions based on feedback patterns to improve review quality.
Incremental Reviews
Trigger re-review on updated PRs analyzing only the new changes.
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Cause | Fix |
|---|
| Too many comments | Review profile too assertive | Switch to "chill" profile or add path exclusions |
| Irrelevant suggestions | Missing context | Add path-specific instructions in .coderabbit.yaml |
| Review not triggered | Draft PR or WIP title | Remove WIP keyword or enable draft review |
| Slow review response | Large diff | Exclude generated files and vendor directories |
Output Format
Present results as a structured report:
Managing Coderabbit Report
══════════════════════════
Resources discovered: [count]
Resource Status Key Metric Issues
──────────────────────────────────────────────
[name] [ok/warn] [value] [findings]
Summary: [total] resources | [ok] healthy | [warn] warnings | [crit] critical
Action Items: [list of prioritized findings]
Target ≤50 lines of output. Use tables for multi-resource comparisons.
Anti-Hallucination Rules
- NEVER assume resource names — always discover via CLI/API in Phase 1 before referencing in Phase 2.
- NEVER fabricate metric names or dimensions — verify against the service documentation or
--help output.
- NEVER mix CLI commands between service versions — confirm which version/API you are targeting.
- ALWAYS use the discovery → verify → analyze chain — every resource referenced must have been discovered first.
- ALWAYS handle empty results gracefully — an empty response is valid data, not an error to retry.
Counter-Rationalizations
| Shortcut | Counter | Why |
|---|
| "I'll skip discovery and check known resources" | Always run Phase 1 discovery first | Resource names change, new resources appear — assumed names cause errors |
| "The user only asked for a quick check" | Follow the full discovery → analysis flow | Quick checks miss critical issues; structured analysis catches silent failures |
| "Default configuration is probably fine" | Audit configuration explicitly | Defaults often leave logging, security, and optimization features disabled |
| "Metrics aren't needed for this" | Always check relevant metrics when available | API/CLI responses show current state; metrics reveal trends and intermittent issues |
| "I don't have access to that" | Try the command and report the actual error | Assumed permission failures prevent useful investigation; actual errors are informative |
