메뉴
Use when a task is ambiguous and needs deep multi-role planning with designer, inspiration, and reviewer perspectives before execution. Skip this for ordinary task plans.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use when turning an academic paper PDF/arXiv/OpenReview page/local LaTeX source into a single-file Chinese HTML deep-reading page, especially when the user wants a Cheat-Sheet style explanation, KaTeX formulas, figure/table evidence, validation, or a publishable research page.
Use when you explicitly want a second local or SSH remote Codex CLI session to prototype, debug, or review code, while your current session remains the primary owner of the final result.
Use when the user wants multi-agent division of labor for research-led work and the lead should stay on the critical path while 1-2 bounded sidecars handle low-coupling tasks. Do not use this for tiny tasks, fully sequential debugging, or overlapping refactors.
Use when the user asks to review a skill, analyze skill quality, update a skill version, or run a repeatable keep/disable/archive decision loop from real failures instead of abstract best practices.
Use when the user explicitly wants to upload a final or near-final PDF to paperreview.ai for an external second opinion. Skip this for local paper critique, which should go through `paper-review-pipeline` first.
学术论文写作助手，专门用于 LaTeX 论文编写、BibTeX 管理、格式化、学术写作规范检查。适用于 AI/ML 研究论文、会议投稿（NeurIPS、ICML、ICLR 等）
| name | all-plan |
| description | Use when a task is ambiguous and needs deep multi-role planning with designer, inspiration, and reviewer perspectives before execution. Skip this for ordinary task plans. |
| metadata | {"short-description":"designer plans + inspiration brainstorms + reviewer scores"} |
Collaborative planning using abstract roles mapped in your current multi-model setup.
Highlights:
inspiration brainstorming for creative/aesthetic ideasdesigner creates the full plan independentlyreviewer scores the plan using the review rubric in this workflow (must pass >= 7.0)For full instructions, see references/flow.md