Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/CodySwannGT/lisa --skill lisa-nightly-lower-code-complexity명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
This skill should be used for any non-trivial request — features, bugs, stories, epics, spikes, or multi-step tasks. It accepts a ticket URL (Jira, Linear, GitHub), a file path containing a spec, or a plain-text prompt. It assembles an agent team, breaks the work into structured tasks, and manages the full lifecycle from research through implementation, code review, deploy, and empirical verification.
any non-trivial request —…
This skill should be used for any non-trivial request — features, bugs, stories, epics, spikes, or multi-step tasks. It accepts a ticket URL (Jira, Linear, GitHub), a file path containing a spec, or a plain-text prompt. It assembles an agent team, breaks the work into structured tasks, and manages the full lifecycle from research through implementation, code review, deploy, and empirical verification.
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | lisa-nightly-lower-code-complexity |
| description | Nightly direct-execution skill… |
| allowed-tools | ["Edit","MultiEdit","Write","Read","Glob","Grep","Bash"] |
The caller provides pre-computed context:
npm, yarn, or bun)Update eslint.thresholds.json with the proposed new threshold values (do NOT change the maxLines threshold)
Run the project's lint script with the provided package manager (e.g., npm run lint, yarn lint, or bun run lint) to find functions that violate the new stricter thresholds
Before editing, check each violating file's total line count (wc -l). If a file is within 20 lines of its max-lines ESLint limit (typically 300), extract helpers into a separate companion file (e.g., fooHelpers.ts) instead of adding them to the same file. Extracting functions into the same file adds net lines and can create new max-lines violations.
Fix violations one file at a time. Read only the specific function that violates — do not pre-read all files upfront. Fix it, then move to the next.
For cognitive complexity violations: use early returns, extract helper functions, replace conditionals with lookup tables
For max-lines-per-function violations: split large functions, extract helper functions, separate concerns
After each file edit, run the project's formatter with the provided package manager (e.g., npm run format, yarn format, or bun run format) to ensure line counts reflect the final formatted state before moving on. Do not reach for a bare npx prettier: when the binary is absent npx silently installs and executes whatever the registry currently publishes under that name, which is an unpinned dependency introduced by a formatting step. If the project has no format script, run the lockfile-pinned binary directly (./node_modules/.bin/prettier --write <file>)
Re-run the lint script with the provided package manager to verify all violations are resolved (both the target metric AND max-lines)
Run the project's typecheck script with the provided package manager to catch type errors early — same reasoning as step 7, so npm run typecheck / yarn typecheck / bun run typecheck, falling back to ./node_modules/.bin/tsc --noEmit rather than npx tsc:
case "$PACKAGE_MANAGER" in
npm) runner=(npm run) ;;
yarn) runner=(yarn) ;;
bun) runner=(bun run) ;;
*) echo "unsupported package manager: $PACKAGE_MANAGER" >&2; exit 2 ;;
esac
status=0
"${runner[@]}" typecheck >tsc.log 2>&1 || status=$?
head -n 30 tsc.log; echo "exit=$status"
Capture the status before the pipe — a pipeline reports its LAST stage's exit code, and head always succeeds, so tsc --noEmit | head -30 reads as clean however many errors it printed (falsifiable-checks, pager-shadowed status). || status=$? rather than ; status=$?: under set -e the ; form exits before the assignment, so the failure is never reported at all. If there are type errors, fix them now — do NOT wait until the commit step. Pre-commit hooks run type checking, and discovering errors at commit time wastes turns.
Run the project's test script with the provided package manager (e.g., npm run test, yarn test, or bun run test) to verify no tests are broken by the refactoring
Commit all changes (refactored code + updated eslint.thresholds.json) with conventional commit messages
Create a PR with gh pr create with a title like "refactor: reduce code complexity: [metrics being reduced]" summarizing the changes