소스 정보
- 저장소
- CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 4월 13일 11:05
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 1,653
- 포크
- 254
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill cis-azure-database-2-4명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
macOS post-exploitation for credential harvesting, DTrace monitoring, TCC bypass, and stealth operations via native tools
Windows userland post-exploitation for credential harvesting, monitoring, AMSI/ETW bypass, and stealth operations
Kubernetes post-exploitation for container escape, secret extraction, RBAC abuse, and cluster persistence
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | cis-azure-database-2.4 |
| description | Ensure that 'Access Policies' are Implemented and Reviewed Periodically |
| category | cis-azure-database |
| version | 2.0.0 |
| author | cyberstrike-official |
| tags | ["cis","azure","redis","cache"] |
| cis_id | 2.4 |
| cis_benchmark | CIS Microsoft Azure Database Services Benchmark v2.0.0 |
| tech_stack | ["azure"] |
| cwe_ids | [] |
| chains_with | [] |
| prerequisites | [] |
| severity_boost | {} |
Access Policies provide an Access Control List (ACL) functionality allowing administrators to define which identities or identity groups have access to what data and commands. This is an implementation of the Role Based Access Control (RBAC) concept and will require careful consideration to deploy and maintain.
Role Based Access Control (RBAC) using Access Control Lists (ACLs) is a method of implementing the principle of least privilege by ensuring that users and user groups with differing needs are presented with the privilege that fulfills their needs and any unnecessary access or functionality is prevented.
Implementing RBAC for any system requires a careful analysis of 'who' needs access to the system, and 'what' privileges or functionality they need to perform. The time required to implement RBAC will increase based on the complexity and size of an environment.
If RBAC is deployed without careful analysis, it may prevent users from accessing data or functionality that they require from the system. Conversely, it may present privilege which is unnecessary and introduce vulnerability to a system.
Once RBAC has been deployed, there should be periodically scheduled access review. During the access review, all entries in the Access Control List and all identities are reviewed for fitness and necessity.
Azure Cache for Redis serviceAccess Policies and review the access policies for fitness and necessity.Please note: No more specific definition can be presented here because the definitions of fitness and necessity are judgments that must be made by the administrators and security personnel with knowledge of the identities and functionality required of the system being evaluated.
Access Policies should be configured with appropriate least-privilege permissions and reviewed periodically for fitness and necessity.
No prescriptive remediation is available due to the specific and unique nature of implementing RBAC for any given system. Implementing RBAC for any system requires a careful analysis of 'who' needs access to the system, and 'what' privileges or functionality they require. The time required to implement RBAC will increase based on the complexity and size of an environment.
By default, no Access Policies exist.
| Controls Version | Control | IG 1 | IG 2 | IG 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v8 | 6.8 Define and Maintain Role-Based Access Control | X | ||
| v7 | 14.7 Enforce Access Control to Data through Automated Tools | X |