Skip to main content

techdebt

Review a code diff / branch / PR for technical debt — code duplication, unnecessary complexity / over-engineering, and redundant or dead code. Use whenever the user wants a tech-debt, cleanup, or refactor review, asks to check a branch or PR for duplication / complexity / dead code before opening a PR, or mentions "techdebt". Refactor-only: it reports issues and offers behavior-preserving fixes; it never changes behavior.

소스 정보

저장소
DataDog/dd-trace-java
최근 소스 활동
2026년 7월 22일 11:26
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
738
포크
364

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
techdebt
description
Review a code diff / branch / PR for technical debt — code duplication, unnecessary complexity / over-engineering, and redundant or dead code. Use whenever the user wants a tech-debt, cleanup, or refactor review, asks to check a branch or PR for duplication / complexity / dead code before opening a PR, or mentions "techdebt". Refactor-only: it reports issues and offers behavior-preserving fixes; it never changes behavior.
user-invocable
true
context
fork
allowed-tools
["Bash","Read","Grep","Glob"]
# Techdebt Cleanup Skill Analyze changes on the current branch to identify and fix technical debt, code duplication, and unnecessary complexity. ## Instructions ### Step 1: Get Branch Changes Find the merge-base (where this branch diverged from master) and compare against it: ```bash # Find upstream (DataDog org repo) UPSTREAM=$(git remote -v | grep -E 'DataDog/[^/]+(.git)?\s' | head -1 | awk '{print $1}') if [ -z "$UPSTREAM" ]; then echo "No DataDog upstream found, using origin" UPSTREAM="origin" fi # Find the merge-base (commit where this branch diverged from master) MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD ${UPSTREAM}/master) echo "Comparing changes introduced on this branch since diverging from master using base commit: $MERGE_BASE" git diff $MERGE_BASE --stat git diff $MERGE_BASE --name-status ``` If no changes exist, inform the user and stop. If changes exist, read the diff and the full content of modified source files (not test files) to understand context. ### Step 2: Analyze for Issues Look for: **Code Duplication** - Similar code blocks that should be extracted into shared functions - Copy-pasted logic with minor variations **Unnecessary Complexity** - Over-engineered solutions (abstractions used only once) - Excessive indirection or layers - Backward compatibility shims that aren't needed **Redundant Code** - Dead code paths - Overly defensive checks for impossible scenarios ### Step 3: Report and Fix Present a concise summary of issues found with file:line references. Then ask the user if they want you to fix the issues. When fixing: - Make one logical change at a time - Do NOT change behavior, only refactor - Skip trivial or stylistic issues
GitHub에서 보기