data-scientist

name	data-scientist
description	Expert data science covering machine learning, statistical modeling, experimentation, predictive analytics, and advanced analytics. Use when selecting ML algorithms, engineering features, designing A/B tests, evaluating model performance, or building predictive pipelines.
license	MIT + Commons Clause
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0","author":"borghei","category":"data-analytics","updated":"2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z","tags":["data-science","machine-learning","statistics","modeling","analytics"]}

Data Scientist

The agent operates as a senior data scientist, selecting algorithms, engineering features, designing experiments, evaluating models, and translating predictions into business impact.

Workflow

1. Define the problem -- Restate the business objective as an ML task (classification, regression, ranking, clustering). Define the primary evaluation metric (e.g., F1 for imbalanced classification, RMSE for regression). Document constraints (latency, interpretability, data volume).
2. Collect and profile data -- Identify sources, check row counts, null rates, class balance, and feature distributions. Flag data-quality issues before modeling.
3. Engineer features -- Create numerical transforms (log, binning), encode categoricals (one-hot, target, frequency), extract time components (hour, day-of-week, cyclical sin/cos). Select top features via importance, mutual information, or RFE.
4. Select and train models -- Use the algorithm selection matrix below. Start simple (logistic/linear regression), then add complexity (Random Forest, XGBoost, neural nets) only if needed. Use cross-validation.
5. Evaluate rigorously -- Report classification metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1, AUC-ROC) or regression metrics (MAE, RMSE, R-squared, MAPE). Compare against a baseline. Check for overfitting (train vs. test gap).
6. Communicate results -- Present business impact (e.g., "model reduces false positives by 30%, saving $500K/yr"). Recommend deployment path or next experiment.

Algorithm Selection Matrix

Scenario	Recommended	When to upgrade
Need interpretability	Logistic / Linear Regression	Always start here for stakeholder-facing models
Small data (< 10K rows)	Random Forest	Move to XGBoost if accuracy insufficient
Medium data, high accuracy needed	XGBoost / LightGBM	Default workhorse for tabular data
Large data, complex patterns	Neural Network	Only when tree methods plateau
Unsupervised grouping	K-Means / DBSCAN	Use silhouette score to validate k

Feature Engineering Examples

Numerical transforms:

import numpy as np, pandas as pd

def engineer_numerical(df: pd.DataFrame, col: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    return pd.DataFrame({
        f'{col}_log':     np.log1p(df[col]),
        f'{col}_sqrt':    np.sqrt(df[col].clip(lower=0)),
        f'{col}_squared': df[col] ** 2,
        f'{col}_binned':  pd.cut(df[col], bins=5, labels=False),
    })

Time-based features with cyclical encoding:

def engineer_time(df: pd.DataFrame, col: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    dt = pd.to_datetime(df[col])
    return pd.DataFrame({
        f'{col}_hour':      dt.dt.hour,
        f'{col}_dayofweek': dt.dt.dayofweek,
        f'{col}_month':     dt.dt.month,
        f'{col}_is_weekend': dt.dt.dayofweek.isin([5, 6]).astype(int),
        f'{col}_hour_sin':  np.sin(2 * np.pi * dt.dt.hour / 24),
        f'{col}_hour_cos':  np.cos(2 * np.pi * dt.dt.hour / 24),
    })

Feature selection (importance-based):

from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

def select_top_features(X, y, n=20):
    rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
    rf.fit(X, y)
    importance = pd.Series(rf.feature_importances_, index=X.columns)
    return importance.nlargest(n).index.tolist()

Model Evaluation

Classification:

from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, precision_score, recall_score, f1_score, roc_auc_score

def evaluate_classifier(y_true, y_pred, y_proba=None) -> dict:
    m = {
        "accuracy":  accuracy_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "precision": precision_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "recall":    recall_score(y_true, y_pred),
        "f1":        f1_score(y_true, y_pred),
    }
    if y_proba is not None:
        m["auc_roc"] = roc_auc_score(y_true, y_proba)
    return m

Regression:

from sklearn.metrics import mean_absolute_error, mean_squared_error, r2_score
import numpy as np

def evaluate_regressor(y_true, y_pred) -> dict:
    return {
        "mae":  mean_absolute_error(y_true, y_pred),
        "rmse": np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(y_true, y_pred)),
        "r2":   r2_score(y_true, y_pred),
    }

A/B Test Design and Analysis

Sample size calculation:

from scipy import stats
import numpy as np

def required_sample_size(baseline_rate: float, mde: float, alpha: float = 0.05, power: float = 0.8) -> int:
    """Return required N per variant. mde is relative (e.g., 0.10 = 10% lift)."""
    effect = baseline_rate * mde
    z_a = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
    z_b = stats.norm.ppf(power)
    p = baseline_rate
    return int(np.ceil(2 * p * (1 - p) * (z_a + z_b) ** 2 / effect ** 2))

# Example: baseline 5% conversion, detect 10% relative lift
# >>> required_sample_size(0.05, 0.10)  -> ~62,214 per variant

Result analysis:

def analyze_ab(control: np.ndarray, treatment: np.ndarray, alpha: float = 0.05) -> dict:
    """Analyze A/B test with proportions z-test."""
    n_c, n_t = len(control), len(treatment)
    p_c, p_t = control.mean(), treatment.mean()
    p_pool = (control.sum() + treatment.sum()) / (n_c + n_t)
    se = np.sqrt(p_pool * (1 - p_pool) * (1/n_c + 1/n_t))
    z = (p_t - p_c) / se
    p_val = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
    return {
        "control_rate": p_c, "treatment_rate": p_t,
        "lift": (p_t - p_c) / p_c,
        "p_value": p_val, "significant": p_val < alpha,
        "ci_95": ((p_t - p_c) - 1.96 * se, (p_t - p_c) + 1.96 * se),
    }

Project Template

# Data Science Project: [Name]
## Business Objective -- What problem are we solving?
## Success Metrics -- Primary: [metric]; Secondary: [metric]
## Data -- Sources, size (rows/features), time period
## Methodology -- Numbered steps
## Results
| Metric | Baseline | Model | Improvement |
|--------|----------|-------|-------------|
## Business Impact -- [Quantified impact]
## Recommendations -- [Next actions]
## Limitations -- [Known caveats]

Reference Materials

• references/ml_algorithms.md -- Algorithm deep dives
• references/feature_engineering.md -- Feature engineering patterns
• references/experimentation.md -- A/B testing guide
• references/statistics.md -- Statistical methods

Scripts

python scripts/experiment_tracker.py log --name "xgb_v2" --params '{"lr":0.1,"depth":6}' --metrics '{"f1":0.87,"auc":0.92}'
python scripts/experiment_tracker.py list --sort-by f1 --top 5
python scripts/experiment_tracker.py compare --ids 1 3 5 --json
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py ttest --file data.csv --col-a group_a --col-b group_b
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py proportion --successes-a 120 --trials-a 1000 --successes-b 145 --trials-b 1000
python scripts/hypothesis_tester.py chi-square --file contingency.csv --json
python scripts/feature_selector.py --file dataset.csv --target churn --top 10
python scripts/feature_selector.py --file dataset.csv --target revenue --method correlation --json

Tool Reference

Tool	Purpose	Key Flags
experiment_tracker.py	Log, list, and compare experiments with parameters, metrics, and tags in a local JSON file	log --name --params --metrics --tags, list --sort-by --top, compare --ids, --json
hypothesis_tester.py	Run statistical tests: Welch's t-test, paired t-test, proportion z-test, chi-square independence	ttest --file --col-a --col-b [--paired], proportion --successes-a --trials-a ..., chi-square --file, --json
feature_selector.py	Rank features by composite score (variance, correlation, mutual information, null rate) for a target column	--file <csv>, --target <col>, --top <n>, --method all/correlation/mutual_info, --json

Troubleshooting

Problem	Likely Cause	Resolution
Model overfits (large train-test gap in metrics)	Too many features, insufficient regularization, or data leakage	Reduce feature count with feature_selector.py, add regularization, and audit feature engineering for temporal leakage
A/B test shows significant result but tiny effect size	Large sample size makes small differences statistically significant	Always report effect size (Cohen's d) alongside p-value; use practical significance thresholds
hypothesis_tester.py p-value differs from scipy	The tool uses normal/t-distribution approximations (standard library only)	For publication-grade analysis, validate with scipy.stats; the tool is designed for fast directional estimates
Feature importance scores are near-zero for all features	Target variable has extremely low variance or the feature set lacks predictive signal	Check target distribution; consider feature engineering or collecting additional data sources
experiment_tracker.py shows experiment IDs out of order	Experiments were logged non-sequentially or the log file was manually edited	IDs are auto-incremented; use --sort-by on a metric for meaningful ordering
Chi-square test fails with "table must be at least 2x2"	CSV contingency table has fewer than 2 rows or 2 columns of numeric data	Ensure the CSV has a header row and at least 2x2 numeric cells; verify the format matches expectations
Class imbalance causes misleading accuracy	Accuracy inflated by majority class predictions	Use F1, precision-recall, or AUC-ROC instead; apply SMOTE or class weights during training

Success Criteria

• Every ML project follows the Define-Collect-Engineer-Train-Evaluate-Communicate workflow before deployment.
• Feature selection is documented: feature_selector.py output is saved with the experiment record.
• All experiments are tracked with experiment_tracker.py including parameters, metrics, and a descriptive name.
• Model evaluation reports include at least 3 metrics (e.g., F1, AUC-ROC, precision) and comparison against a baseline.
• A/B tests pre-register the hypothesis, sample size calculation, and primary metric before data collection begins.
• Statistical tests report effect size and confidence intervals, not just p-values.
• Business impact is quantified in dollar terms or user-metric terms (e.g., "reduces false positives by 30%, saving $500K/yr").

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Machine learning algorithm selection, feature engineering, model training and evaluation, A/B test design and analysis, statistical hypothesis testing, experiment tracking, and communicating results to stakeholders.

Out of scope: Model deployment to production (see ml-ops-engineer), data pipeline infrastructure, dashboard development, and real-time serving architecture.

Limitations: The Python tools use only the Python standard library. hypothesis_tester.py uses normal and t-distribution approximations that are accurate for moderate sample sizes but should be validated with scipy for edge cases (very small n, extreme skew). feature_selector.py computes approximate mutual information using binned discretization -- for high-precision feature selection, use sklearn's mutual_info_classif or permutation importance. All tools process local files and do not integrate with MLflow, W&B, or other tracking platforms.

Integration Points

• MLOps Engineer (data-analytics/ml-ops-engineer): Trained models are handed off for production deployment, monitoring, and registry management.
• Data Analyst (data-analytics/data-analyst): Complex analytical questions requiring predictive modeling are escalated from the analyst to the data scientist.
• Analytics Engineer (data-analytics/analytics-engineer): Feature engineering pipelines may depend on mart models as upstream data sources.
• Product Team (product-team/): Experiment results inform product decisions; A/B test designs are co-created with product managers.
• Engineering (engineering/senior-ml-engineer): Algorithm implementation details and model architecture decisions bridge data science and ML engineering.