소스 정보
- 저장소
- diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 3월 1일 06:21
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 50
- 포크
- 19
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill apex-evolve명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Token-efficient tracking for AI orchestration. CLI-first for status updates (~50 tokens), agent fallback for complex ops (~1KB). Use when: updating task status, querying blockers, creating progress files, validating phases.
AshAi extension guidelines for integrating AI capabilities with Ash Framework. Use when implementing vectorization/embeddings, exposing Ash actions as LLM tools, creating prompt-backed actions, or setting up MCP servers. Covers semantic search, LangChain integration, and structured outputs.
This skill should be used when solving hard questions, complex architectural problems, or debugging issues that benefit from GPT-5 Pro or GPT-5.1 thinking models with large file context. Use when standard Claude analysis needs deeper reasoning or extended context windows.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | apex-evolve |
| description | Build and maintain apex articles—human-readable synthesis pieces. |
Build and maintain apex articles through creation, evolution, and length management.
/apex-evolve create "Article Title"
/apex-evolve evolve [article-slug]
/apex-evolve check
createGenerate a new apex article from scratch.
Input: Article title from the approved list in obsidian/apex/apex-articles.md
Process:
obsidian/project/writing-style.md for apex article guidelinesOutput: New apex article at obsidian/apex/[slug].md
evolveUpdate an existing apex article when sources have changed.
Input: Specific article slug, or omit to auto-select stalest
Process: See 10-step evolution process below
Output: Improved article + review archive
checkReport which apex articles need evolution.
Process:
apex_sources frontmattermodified date against the apex article's apex_last_synthesisOutput: List of articles needing attention with staleness scores
Apex articles use standard frontmatter plus apex-specific fields:
---
title: "Article Title"
created: 2026-01-24
modified: 2026-01-24
human_modified: null
ai_modified: 2026-01-24T00:00:00+00:00
draft: false
topics: []
concepts: []
related_articles: []
ai_contribution: 100
author: null
ai_system: claude-opus-4-5-20251101
ai_generated_date: 2026-01-24
last_curated: null
# Apex-specific fields
apex_sources:
- topics/free-will
- topics/agent-causation
- concepts/mental-causation
apex_last_synthesis: 2026-01-24T00:00:00+00:00
apex_thesis: "One-sentence thesis statement"
---
If article specified, use it. Otherwise, auto-select:
obsidian/apex/apex_last_synthesisCompare each source's modified date to apex_last_synthesis. List all changed sources.
Read the full content of each changed source to understand new material.
Apply three critical personas:
Clarity Critic: Where is the prose unclear, jargon-heavy, or hard to follow? Where does the narrative lose the reader?
Redundancy Hunter: What passages repeat information? Where does the article say the same thing twice? What can be cut without losing meaning?
Narrative Flow Analyst: Where does the argument structure break down? Are transitions smooth? Does the piece build to its conclusion?
Apply three supportive personas:
Connection Finder: What new connections from changed sources should be woven in? What synthesis opportunities exist?
Synthesis Strengthener: Where can the article better show how pieces fit together? Where is the "so what" unclear?
Human Reader Advocate: What would make this more engaging to read? Where does it feel like a reference rather than a narrative?
Always do:
If over 4000 words (condensation required):
If under 2500 words (expansion needed):
ai_modified: [current UTC timestamp]
apex_last_synthesis: [current UTC timestamp]
Adjust ai_contribution if human edits were preserved.
Create obsidian/reviews/apex-evolve-[date]-[slug].md containing:
Log to obsidian/workflow/changelog.md:
## [timestamp] apex-evolve
- **Status**: Complete
- **Article**: [title]
- **Changed sources**: [count]
- **Word count**: [before] → [after]
- **Review**: reviews/apex-evolve-[date]-[slug].md
Create git commit:
feat(apex): Evolve [article-title]
- Integrated changes from [N] updated sources
- [Brief summary of improvements]
Apex articles follow this structure:
# [Title]
[Opening paragraph stating the integrated thesis - what this synthesis argues]
## [Narrative Section 1]
[Build the argument, drawing from multiple sources]
[Link to sources: "As explored in [[source-article]]..."]
## [Narrative Section 2]
[Continue building, showing connections between ideas]
## [Additional sections as needed]
## Synthesis
[Show how the pieces fit together in a way individual articles don't]
[This is the unique value of the apex article]
## Relation to Site Perspective
[Connect to tenets - required for all articles]
## Source Articles
This apex article synthesizes:
- [[source-1|Source 1 Title]]
- [[source-2|Source 2 Title]]
- ...
Target: 2500-4000 words
Why this range:
Condensation techniques:
Expansion techniques:
When other skills create or modify content that's an apex source:
/expand-topic or /research-topic completesapex_sourcesobsidian/workflow/todo.md:
- [ ] P2 apex-evolve: [apex-article-slug] — source [modified-article] updated
This ensures apex articles stay current without manual tracking.
obsidian/apex/apex-articles.md