continuity-ledger

name	continuity-ledger
model	sonnet
description	Maintains a running decision log and context state across agent sessions, preventing context loss between clears and session boundaries. Use when: 'starting a new session on an ongoing project', 'context is getting heavy', 'preserve state before clearing', 'create a handoff document', 'pick up where I left off'.
category	wisdom-garden
triggers	["starting a new session on an ongoing project","context is getting heavy","preserve state before clearing","create a handoff document","pick up where I left off"]
tier	1
agents	["primary"]
tool_dependencies	["file_system"]
inputs	[{"name":"session_context","type":"string","description":"Description of the current session's work, decisions made, and state to preserve","required":true},{"name":"prior_ledger","type":"ref","format":"cas-ref","description":"Reference to a previous ledger entry to build upon (for multi-session chains)","required":false}]
outputs	[{"name":"ledger","type":"ref","format":"cas-ref","description":"YAML handoff document capturing session state, decisions, findings, and next steps"}]

Continuity Ledger

Purpose: Create structured YAML handoff documents that preserve session state -- decisions made, files modified, findings discovered, approaches tried, and concrete next steps -- so that a fresh session can resume work without context loss. Each clear/restart gets a clean context with full signal instead of degraded compacted context.

---

I. When to Use

• Before running /clear when context usage is approaching 70%+
• At the end of a multi-day implementation session
• During complex refactors you expect to pick up and put down
• Any session expected to hit 85%+ context utilization
• When switching between projects and need to freeze state for later

When NOT to Use

• Quick tasks under 30 minutes
• Simple single-file bug fixes
• Sessions that will complete without approaching context limits

---

II. Why Clear + Ledger Instead of Compact

Each compaction is lossy compression. After several compactions, you are working with degraded context -- key decisions and file paths silently disappear. Clearing and loading the ledger gives a fresh context with full signal from the structured handoff document.

---

III. Workflow

Step 1: Determine Ledger Location

Check for existing handoff folders to maintain session continuity:

ls -td thoughts/shared/handoffs/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename

• If a handoff folder exists, use that session name
• If none exist, use general as the folder name
• File path: thoughts/shared/handoffs/{session-name}/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM_description.yaml

Step 2: Capture Session State

Gather the following from the current session:

1. Goal -- what this session set out to accomplish (one line, shown in statusline)
2. Now -- what the next session should do first (one line, shown in statusline)
3. Test command -- a single command to verify the work (go test ./..., npm test, etc.)
4. Done this session -- completed tasks with file references
5. Decisions -- choices made and their rationale
6. Findings -- key learnings and discoveries
7. Worked/Failed -- approaches to repeat vs. avoid
8. Next steps -- concrete action items for the next session
9. Files -- created and modified file lists

Step 3: Write YAML Handoff

Write the ledger using this exact format (field names are parsed by the statusline -- do not rename them):

---
session: {session-name}
date: YYYY-MM-DD
status: complete|partial|blocked
outcome: SUCCEEDED|PARTIAL_PLUS|PARTIAL_MINUS|FAILED
---

goal: {What this session accomplished}
now: {What next session should do first}
test: {Verification command}

done_this_session:
  - task: {Completed task description}
    files: [file1.py, file2.py]

blockers: [{any blocking issues}]

questions: [{unresolved questions for next session}]

decisions:
  - {decision_name}: {rationale}

findings:
  - {key_finding}: {details}

worked: [{approaches that worked}]
failed: [{approaches that failed and why}]

next:
  - {First next step}
  - {Second next step}

files:
  created: [{new files}]
  modified: [{changed files}]

Step 4: Confirm and Mark Outcome

Ask the user for their assessment of the session outcome:

• SUCCEEDED -- task completed successfully
• PARTIAL_PLUS -- mostly done, minor issues remain
• PARTIAL_MINUS -- some progress, major issues remain
• FAILED -- task abandoned or blocked

Record the outcome in the YAML frontmatter.

---

IV. Resuming from a Ledger

To resume in a new session:

1. Load the most recent handoff YAML
2. Read the goal: and now: fields for immediate orientation
3. Run the test: command to verify the baseline still holds
4. Review decisions: and findings: to restore context
5. Start executing from next: list

---

V. Output

• A YAML handoff document at thoughts/shared/handoffs/{session-name}/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM_description.yaml
• Fields: session metadata, goal, now, test command, completed tasks with file refs, decisions with rationale, findings, worked/failed approaches, next steps, file manifest
• Target size: ~400 tokens (compact enough to load without significant context cost)

---

VI. Examples

Scenario 1: 3-hour refactor session approaching 75% context --> Ledger captures: goal="Migrate event system from callbacks to channels", now="Wire remaining 3 handlers in server/events.go", 5 completed tasks with 12 files, 2 architectural decisions (chose channels over callbacks because of backpressure support), 1 blocker (circular import in pkg/bus), 4 next steps.

Scenario 2: Multi-day feature across sessions --> First ledger: goal="Add WebSocket hub to gateway", now="Implement broadcast logic", outcome=PARTIAL_PLUS. Second session loads ledger, completes broadcast, writes new ledger: goal="WebSocket hub broadcast complete", now="Add integration tests for hub reconnection", outcome=SUCCEEDED.

Scenario 3: Session hit a dead end --> Ledger captures: outcome=PARTIAL_MINUS, failed=["Attempted to use SSE for bidirectional communication -- protocol is server-to-client only"], decisions=["Switch to WebSocket for bidirectional requirement"], now="Start fresh with WebSocket approach using the ws package".

---

VII. Edge Cases

• No prior handoffs exist: create the thoughts/shared/handoffs/general/ directory and start the first ledger
• Session was purely exploratory with no code changes: still write the ledger capturing findings and decisions; set status to complete with outcome SUCCEEDED and files sections empty
• Multiple active session chains: use distinct session-name folders to keep ledgers separated by workstream
• Prior ledger referenced but file is missing: note the gap in the new ledger's findings and reconstruct what is known from git log and current file state

---

VIII. Anti-Patterns

• Writing the ledger after context is already degraded from multiple compactions -- write it early, at 70% context, not after the damage is done
• Using alternative field names (session_goal, objective, focus, current) -- the statusline parser expects exactly goal: and now:
• Putting implementation details in the ledger instead of references -- the ledger points to files, it does not duplicate their contents
• Skipping the outcome marking step -- the outcome field drives session analytics and helps identify patterns in what causes partial/failed sessions