소스 정보
- 저장소
- DojoGenesis/plugins
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 4월 8일 04:22
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 1
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/DojoGenesis/plugins --skill research명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Run a bounded kata roll over the project's bring queue — start a session with an explicit target (reps or minutes), surface and stage exactly one bring per tick, log the outcome only on the human's word, then advance. Use when the user says "start a roll", "roll for N reps", "do a 25-minute roll", "tick", "next rep", "resolve this tick", "skip this tick", or "pause/resume/end the roll".
Set up the kata roll in a project that already runs (or is starting) the bring loop — confirm bring/ exists, explain where the roll's own ledger lives, walk through the opt-in timer, and make the two-plugin coexistence with bring-loop explicit. Use when the user says "set up kata-harness", "install the roll plugin", "add rolls on top of bring-loop", or asks how the timed roll relates to their daily bring.
Produces markdown memory artifacts (conversation summaries, seed files, philosophical reflections, doc updates) and a dated compression log by distilling a long conversation into its essential decisions and learnings. For the lighter, routine end-of-session wrap-up, use `session-compression` instead — this skill is for a long conversation that needs the fuller multi-artifact treatment. Use when: "compress this context", "distill this conversation", "create a memory artifact", "condense this history", "extract key wisdom before handoff".
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | research |
| description | Document codebase as-is with thoughts directory for historical context |
| model | claude-opus-4-5-20251101 |
| user-invocable | false |
You are tasked with conducting comprehensive research across the codebase to answer user questions by spawning parallel sub-agents and synthesizing their findings.
When this command is invoked, respond with:
I'm ready to research the codebase. Please provide your research question or area of interest, and I'll analyze it thoroughly by exploring relevant components and connections.
Then wait for the user's research query.
Read any directly mentioned files first:
Analyze and decompose the research question:
Spawn parallel sub-agent tasks for comprehensive research:
For codebase research:
IMPORTANT: All agents are documentarians, not critics. They will describe what exists without suggesting improvements or identifying issues.
For thoughts directory:
For web research (only if user explicitly asks):
For Linear tickets (if relevant):
The key is to use these agents intelligently:
Wait for all sub-agents to complete and synthesize findings:
Gather metadata for the research document:
hack/spec_metadata.sh script to generate all relevant metadatathoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-ENG-XXXX-description.md
YYYY-MM-DD-ENG-XXXX-description.md where:
2025-01-08-ENG-1478-parent-child-tracking.md2025-01-08-authentication-flow.mdGenerate research document:
mkdir -p thoughts/shared/research---
date: [Current date and time with timezone in ISO format]
researcher: [Researcher name from thoughts status]
git_commit: [Current commit hash]
branch: [Current branch name]
repository: [Repository name]
topic: "[User's Question/Topic]"
tags: [research, codebase, relevant-component-names]
status: complete
last_updated: [Current date in YYYY-MM-DD format]
last_updated_by: [Researcher name]
---
# Research: [User's Question/Topic]
**Date**: [Current date and time with timezone from step 4]
**Researcher**: [Researcher name from thoughts status]
**Git Commit**: [Current commit hash from step 4]
**Branch**: [Current branch name from step 4]
**Repository**: [Repository name]
## Research Question
[Original user query]
## Summary
[High-level documentation of what was found, answering the user's question by describing what exists]
## Detailed Findings
### [Component/Area 1]
- Description of what exists ([file.ext:line](link))
- How it connects to other components
- Current implementation details (without evaluation)
### [Component/Area 2]
...
## Code References
- `path/to/file.py:123` - Description of what's there
- `another/file.ts:45-67` - Description of the code block
## Architecture Documentation
[Current patterns, conventions, and design implementations found in the codebase]
## Historical Context (from thoughts/)
[Relevant insights from thoughts/ directory with references]
- `thoughts/shared/something.md` - Historical decision about X
- Past exploration of Y
Note: Paths exclude "searchable/" even if found there
[Links to other research documents in thoughts/shared/research/]
[Any areas that need further investigation]
Add GitHub permalinks (if applicable):
git branch --show-current and git statusgh repo view --json owner,namehttps://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/blob/{commit}/{file}#L{line}Present findings:
Handle follow-up questions:
last_updated and last_updated_by to reflect the updatelast_updated_note: "Added follow-up research for [brief description]" to frontmatter## Follow-up Research [timestamp]thoughts/searchable/allison/old_stuff/notes.md → thoughts/allison/old_stuff/notes.mdthoughts/searchable/shared/prs/123.md → thoughts/shared/prs/123.mdthoughts/searchable/global/shared/templates.md → thoughts/global/shared/templates.mdlast_updated, git_commit)