Skip to main content

review-pr-thread-verify

Called by review-pr for each unresolved review thread it authored: judges from the thread, the author's replies, and the current code whether the original concern is addressed, stale, or still standing, and returns exactly one disposition with a drafted reply where one is needed. Not for direct use.

소스 정보

저장소
doodledood/manifest-dev
최근 소스 활동
2026년 9월 3일 13:23
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
73
포크
10

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
review-pr-thread-verify
description
Called by review-pr for each unresolved review thread it authored: judges from the thread, the author's replies, and the current code whether the original concern is addressed, stale, or still standing, and returns exactly one disposition with a drafted reply where one is needed. Not for direct use.
user-invocable
false
# review-pr-thread-verify Decide what has happened to one review finding since we posted it. The caller hands over everything; this skill judges and returns, and never posts, resolves, or edits anything itself. **Receives.** The original finding (its anchor, body, the commit or head SHA it was reviewed at, and the concrete concern it raised); every author reply on the thread since our last message, plus every prior reply we posted there; the current code at the anchor with nearby context, and any commits since the original review that touched the relevant range; the full PR history (all comments, review threads, commit messages, the current PR description, our prior review and comment bodies); bundle context for each linked PR (diff, description, top-level conversation); and the caller's voice profile — its rules for how a posted comment reads — to apply to any reply drafted here. **Judges.** Read the concrete concern first and hold it fixed: the question is whether *that* failure mode is gone, conceded, disproven, or still live — not whether the thread has been discussed. A code change counts only when it touches the relevant range and removes the failure mode; a reply counts only when a fair-minded human reviewer would concede it. Push back only on new signal — a new author reply or a code change — and stay on the specific point under contention; never repeat an argument already made on the thread. **Returns exactly one disposition:** - `addressed-by-fix` — A commit after our review modified the relevant code and removes the concrete failure mode. Straightforward code fixes need no reply unless there was active discussion to answer; draft one only then. - `addressed-by-valid-reply` — The author replied on this or another thread with an argument a fair-minded human reviewer would concede: correct factual context, a deliberate owner trade-off, a valid out-of-scope boundary, or code elsewhere already covering the concern. Draft a short concession or acknowledgment. - `false-positive-or-stale` — Our comment was wrong, stale, or is disproven by current PR history. Draft a brief correction that owns the miss. - `needs-our-pushback` — The author replied or changed code, but the concrete concern remains. Draft a short reply for the existing thread on that specific point. - `still-pending` — No relevant new author reply and no relevant code change since our last look. Draft nothing. **Return shape.** The disposition name, one short reason (the evidence: the commit, the reply, or the absence of either), and the drafted reply text when the disposition calls for one, written in the supplied voice profile.
GitHub에서 보기