claude-for-legal

# Claude for Legal 100+ skills across 13 practice-area plugins. Each plugin learns your playbook via cold-start interview and writes a practice profile every skill reads from. ## Source Repository - **GitHub:** [anthropics/claude-for-legal](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal) - **Install upstream:** `/plugin install commercial-legal@claude-for-legal` (Claude Code) or `npx skills add anthropics/claude-for-legal` Verified citations via CourtListener, Trellis, and Westlaw (via Thomson Reuters CoCounsel plugin). --- ## `/commercial-legal:review` Reviews vendor MSAs, NDAs, and SaaS agreements against your negotiation playbook. Tracks amendment history, flags renewal deadlines, routes escalations with draft asks. **Example prompts:** - Review this vendor MSA [paste] — we're the customer. Check liability cap (must be 2x fees), data processing, IP ownership, termination for convenience. Draft redlines for every deviation. - `/commercial-legal:renewal-tracker` — contracts with cancel-by deadlines in next 90 days. Current terms, last accepted deviations, recommended action: renew/renegotiate/terminate. - `/commercial-legal:amendment-history` — renegotiating with [vendor]. Full amendment history [paste base + amendments]: what changed at each step and what we gave up. --- ## `/privacy-legal:dpa-review` Reviews Data Processing Agreements as controller or processor. Checks GDPR Article 28 requirements, flags missing mandatory provisions, redlines deviations from standard DPA template. **Companion skills:** DPIA generation, DSAR drafting, regulation gap analysis. **Example prompts:** - Review this DPA [paste] — we are the controller. Check Article 28 mandatory clauses, flag missing provisions, redline liability/audit shifts away from us. - `/privacy-legal:dsar-response` — DSAR from [name] on [date]. Draft acknowledgment letter and fulfillment steps within GDPR 30-day window. - `/privacy-legal:reg-gap-analysis` — compare privacy policy [paste] against latest GDPR and CCPA. Gaps prioritised by regulatory risk with redraft recommendations. --- ## `/ai-governance-legal:vendor-ai-review` Reviews AI vendor contracts for governance risks — EU AI Act classification, data usage rights, model training opt-outs, liability for AI outputs, audit provisions. **Companion skills:** AI Impact Assessments, internal AI usage policy drafts. **Example prompts:** - CRM vendor updated terms with AI features [paste]. New AI provisions? Training on our data? Conflicts with AI governance policy? - `/ai-governance-legal:use-case-triage` — deploying AI for [use case]. EU AI Act classification: prohibited/high-risk/limited-risk/minimal-risk? Compliance steps before deployment? - `/ai-governance-legal:policy-starter` — draft internal AI usage policy for 200-person B2B SaaS. Cover approved tools, prohibited uses, data handling, employee obligations, review cadence. --- ## Practice Profile Setup On first use, run cold-start interview for the relevant practice area: 1. Organisation type and size 2. Standard templates and non-negotiables 3. Escalation paths and approvers 4. Jurisdiction and regulatory scope Save the profile for consistent future reviews. --- ## Guardrails - Decision support only — not legal advice. - Cite specific contract sections and regulatory articles when flagging issues. - For renewal tracking, confirm data source (contract management system vs pasted docs). - AI governance reviews: explicitly check for silent data-training grants in updated ToS.