Skip to main content

resolve-contradictions

Scan the vault for semantic contradictions: status drift, misplaced completions, malformed projects, pool drift, and orphaned system references. Reports findings with evidence and resolution options. Use when the user says 'contradictions', 'consistency check', 'find inconsistencies', or 'vault contradictions'.

소스 정보

저장소
emcodeio/weave
최근 소스 활동
2026년 4월 12일 00:35
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
2
포크
1

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
resolve-contradictions
description
Scan the vault for semantic contradictions: status drift, misplaced completions, malformed projects, pool drift, and orphaned system references. Reports findings with evidence and resolution options. Use when the user says 'contradictions', 'consistency check', 'find inconsistencies', or 'vault contradictions'.
argument-hint
[optional: project name for targeted scan]
context
fork
agent
contradictions-resolver
# Contradiction Scan ## Current vault state ### Active projects !`obsidian search query="categories: Projects" vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}" format=json 2>/dev/null || echo "(Could not search vault — Obsidian may not be running. Use Glob to list Notes/*.md and filter by categories instead.)"` ### System rules inventory !`ls .claude/rules/` ### Skills inventory !`ls .claude/skills/` ### Agents inventory !`ls .claude/agents/` ## Your task Scan the vault for semantic contradictions and report findings with evidence and resolution options. **Mode**: - If `$ARGUMENTS` is provided → **targeted scan** on that project. Run detection types 1-4 on the named project, plus type 5 cross-reference against Action Pool and Someday Pool. Only run type 6 (orphaned system references) if the project relates to system design. - If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty → **full vault scan**. Run all 6 detection types across the entire vault. ## Quality standards - **Never auto-resolve** — report findings and offer options. The user decides. - **Evidence from both sides** — always quote the conflicting sources so the user can judge. - **Group related findings** — multiple issues in the same file should be presented together. - **Skip noise** — don't report things that are clearly fine. False positives waste attention. - **Severity matters** — lead with critical findings. Minor issues go at the end. ## Output Return a structured contradiction report with: - Summary counts by severity (critical / moderate / minor) - Each finding with type, evidence quotes, and resolution options - Detection types that found nothing explicitly noted (confirms they ran)
GitHub에서 보기