원클릭으로
analyze-convergence
Interpret flash algorithm convergence metrics, identify patterns, and produce
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Interpret flash algorithm convergence metrics, identify patterns, and produce
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
NeqSim API patterns and code recipes. USE WHEN: writing Java or Python code that uses NeqSim for thermodynamic calculations, process simulation, or property retrieval. Covers EOS selection, fluid creation, flash calculations, property access, equipment patterns, and unit conventions.
Production platform process modeling patterns for NeqSim. USE WHEN: building full topside process models for oil & gas platforms (FPSO, fixed, semi-sub) from design documents, P&IDs, or operational data. Covers fluid creation with TBP fractions, multi-stage separation with recycles, recompression trains with compressor curves and anti-surge, export/injection compression, oil stabilization, scrubber liquid recovery, iteration strategies, and structured result extraction. Derived from 15+ production NCS platform models.
Power generation patterns for NeqSim. USE WHEN: modeling gas turbines, steam turbines, HRSG, combined cycle systems, waste heat recovery, or calculating fuel gas consumption and thermal efficiency. Covers GasTurbine, SteamTurbine, HRSG, CombinedCycleSystem classes and heat integration with PinchAnalysis.
Structured inventory of NeqSim's capabilities by engineering discipline. USE WHEN: checking what NeqSim can do, planning implementations, assessing gaps for engineering tasks, or routing work to the right agent. Covers thermodynamics, process equipment, PVT, standards, mechanical design, flow assurance, safety, and economics.
Jupyter notebook patterns for NeqSim. USE WHEN: creating or reviewing Jupyter notebooks that use NeqSim for process simulation, thermodynamics, or PVT analysis. Covers devtools workspace setup, class imports, notebook structure, visualization requirements, and results.json schema.
Extracts process simulation data from unstructured sources (text, tables, PFDs, data sheets, STID/E3D line lists) and converts it to NeqSim JSON builder format or PipingRouteBuilder route models. USE WHEN: a user provides a process description, PFD, operating data, line-list table, or design document and wants a running NeqSim simulation. Covers equipment mapping, stream wiring, route hydraulics, unit conversion, composition normalization, and confidence scoring.
| name | analyze_convergence |
| description | Interpret flash algorithm convergence metrics, identify patterns, and produce |
Interpret flash algorithm convergence metrics, identify patterns, and produce publication-quality analysis for the Results section.
import json
import pandas as pd
def load_results(results_dir, algorithm_name):
"""Load JSONL results into DataFrame."""
records = []
with open(f"{results_dir}/raw/{algorithm_name}_results.jsonl") as f:
for line in f:
records.append(json.loads(line))
return pd.DataFrame(records)
def convergence_by_family(df):
"""Calculate convergence rate per fluid family."""
return df.groupby("family").agg(
total=("converged", "count"),
converged=("converged", "sum"),
rate_pct=("converged", lambda x: round(100 * x.mean(), 2)),
median_time_ms=("cpu_time_ms", "median")
).reset_index()
Generate 2D convergence maps in (T, P) space:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
def plot_convergence_map(df, family_name, algorithm_name, save_path):
"""Plot convergence success/failure in TP space."""
fam = df[df["family"] == family_name]
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 6))
conv = fam[fam["converged"] == True]
fail = fam[fam["converged"] == False]
ax.scatter(conv["T_K"] - 273.15, conv["P_bara"],
c="green", alpha=0.3, s=10, label="Converged")
ax.scatter(fail["T_K"] - 273.15, fail["P_bara"],
c="red", alpha=0.8, s=20, marker="x", label="Failed")
ax.set_xlabel("Temperature (°C)")
ax.set_ylabel("Pressure (bara)")
ax.set_title(f"Convergence Map — {family_name} — {algorithm_name}")
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
ax.set_yscale("log")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()
def plot_iteration_comparison(df_base, df_cand, family_name, save_path):
"""Compare iteration counts between algorithms."""
# Merge on case_id for paired comparison
merged = df_base.merge(df_cand, on="case_id", suffixes=("_base", "_cand"))
# Only cases where both converged
both = merged[(merged["converged_base"]) & (merged["converged_cand"])]
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(14, 6))
# Histogram comparison
ax = axes[0]
bins = np.arange(0, 50, 1)
ax.hist(both["iterations_base"], bins=bins, alpha=0.5,
label="Baseline", color="blue")
ax.hist(both["iterations_cand"], bins=bins, alpha=0.5,
label="Candidate", color="orange")
ax.set_xlabel("Iterations")
ax.set_ylabel("Count")
ax.set_title(f"Iteration Distribution — {family_name}")
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Parity plot
ax = axes[1]
ax.scatter(both["iterations_base"], both["iterations_cand"],
alpha=0.3, s=10)
max_iter = max(both["iterations_base"].max(), both["iterations_cand"].max())
ax.plot([0, max_iter], [0, max_iter], "k--", alpha=0.5, label="y = x")
ax.set_xlabel("Baseline Iterations")
ax.set_ylabel("Candidate Iterations")
ax.set_title(f"Iteration Parity — {family_name}")
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
ax.set_aspect("equal")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()
def plot_timing_comparison(df_base, df_cand, save_path):
"""Box plot of timing by family."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
families = sorted(df_base["family"].unique())
positions = np.arange(len(families))
width = 0.35
base_times = [df_base[df_base["family"] == f]["cpu_time_ms"].values
for f in families]
cand_times = [df_cand[df_cand["family"] == f]["cpu_time_ms"].values
for f in families]
bp1 = ax.boxplot(base_times, positions=positions - width/2,
widths=width, patch_artist=True,
boxprops=dict(facecolor="lightblue"))
bp2 = ax.boxplot(cand_times, positions=positions + width/2,
widths=width, patch_artist=True,
boxprops=dict(facecolor="lightsalmon"))
ax.set_xticks(positions)
ax.set_xticklabels(families, rotation=45, ha="right")
ax.set_ylabel("CPU Time (ms)")
ax.set_title("Flash Timing Comparison by Family")
ax.legend([bp1["boxes"][0], bp2["boxes"][0]], ["Baseline", "Candidate"])
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis="y")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()
def analyze_failures(df_base, df_cand):
"""Identify cases where algorithms disagree."""
merged = df_base.merge(df_cand, on="case_id", suffixes=("_base", "_cand"))
# Cases candidate fixes
fixed = merged[(~merged["converged_base"]) & (merged["converged_cand"])]
# Cases candidate breaks
broken = merged[(merged["converged_base"]) & (~merged["converged_cand"])]
# Cases both fail
both_fail = merged[(~merged["converged_base"]) & (~merged["converged_cand"])]
return {
"fixed_by_candidate": len(fixed),
"broken_by_candidate": len(broken),
"both_fail": len(both_fail),
"fixed_cases": fixed["case_id"].tolist(),
"broken_cases": broken["case_id"].tolist()
}
Generate a table suitable for the paper:
def generate_results_table(df_base, df_cand):
"""Generate the main comparison table."""
rows = []
for family in sorted(df_base["family"].unique()):
b = df_base[df_base["family"] == family]
c = df_cand[df_cand["family"] == family]
rows.append({
"Family": family,
"N": len(b),
"Conv_base_%": round(100 * b["converged"].mean(), 1),
"Conv_cand_%": round(100 * c["converged"].mean(), 1),
"Iter_base_med": b[b["converged"]]["iterations"].median(),
"Iter_cand_med": c[c["converged"]]["iterations"].median(),
"Time_base_ms": round(b[b["converged"]]["cpu_time_ms"].median(), 2),
"Time_cand_ms": round(c[c["converged"]]["cpu_time_ms"].median(), 2),
})
return pd.DataFrame(rows)
Every paper should include:
| Figure | Shows | Section |
|---|---|---|
| Convergence maps (per family) | Where in TP space algorithms succeed/fail | Results |
| Iteration histograms | Distribution comparison | Results |
| Iteration parity plot | Paired case comparison | Results |
| Timing box plots | Speed comparison by family | Results |
| Failure regions | Where failures cluster | Discussion |
| Improvement map | Where candidate improves over baseline | Results |
| Table | Shows | Section |
|---|---|---|
| Algorithm summary | Settings, description | Methods |
| Fluid family definitions | Components, ranges | Methods |
| Main results | Conv rate, iterations, timing by family | Results |
| Statistical tests | p-values, effect sizes | Results |
| Failure catalog excerpt | Notable failure cases | Discussion |