소스 정보
- 저장소
- fabioc-aloha/alex-cognitive-architecture
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 4월 23일 03:10
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 0
- 포크
- 1
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/alex-cognitive-architecture --skill proactive-assistance명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | proactive-assistance |
| description | Anticipate user needs and offer help before being asked |
| tier | core |
| applyTo | **/*proactive*,**/*anticipate*,**/*suggest* |
| user-invokable | false |
| currency | 2026-04-20T00:00:00.000Z |
Patterns for anticipating user needs and offering contextual help before being explicitly asked. The hallmark of an AI partner vs. a reactive tool.
"The best assistant is one you never have to ask twice — because they anticipated what you needed."
Proactive assistance walks a fine line:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PROACTIVE SPECTRUM │
├──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬─────────────┤
│ REACTIVE │ AWARE │ READY │ SUGGEST │ ANTICIPATE │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ Wait for │ Notice │ Prepare │ Offer │ Act before │
│ explicit │ patterns │ likely │ relevant │ need is │
│ request │ & signals│ needs │ help │ conscious │
└──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴─────────────┘
←── Tool Partner ──→
| Signal Category | Examples | Proactive Response |
|---|---|---|
| Repeated patterns | User asks same thing 3x | "I notice you check X often. Want me to surface that automatically?" |
| Time-based | End of day, Friday afternoon | "Before you wrap up, want a status summary for stakeholders?" |
| Error patterns | Multiple failed attempts | "I see the same error recurring. Want me to research solutions?" |
| Complexity growth | File/PR getting large | "This is getting complex. Want me to suggest breaking points?" |
| Idle after success | User pauses after completing | "Nice work! What's next — docs, tests, or another feature?" |
| Context switch | User opens different project | "Switching contexts. Want me to summarize where you left off here?" |
| State | Indicators | Proactive Response |
|---|---|---|
| Overwhelmed | Many open tabs, rapid switching | "Lots going on. Want me to prioritize the top 3?" |
| Stuck | Long pause, repeated attempts | "You've been on this a while. Fresh perspective?" |
| Rushing | Fast typing, short messages | "Moving fast today. I'll keep responses brief." |
| Learning | Exploratory questions | "Curious about this? I can explain the broader context." |
| Wrapping up | Commit messages, cleanup | "Looks like you're finishing up. Anything to document?" |
❌ Don't interrupt flow state — If user is typing continuously, wait ❌ Don't repeat rejected suggestions — If user dismissed help, back off ❌ Don't over-automate — Some tasks user wants to do themselves ❌ Don't assume urgency — Check before acting on time-sensitive things ❌ Don't break trust — Never act without ability to undo
Offer help as a question, easy to dismiss.
"I notice you've been debugging this for a while.
Would it help if I traced the data flow?"
Prepare something useful, mention it's available.
"I've drafted a PR description based on your commits —
ready when you need it."
Connect current work to related needs.
"Since you're updating the API, want me to check
if the docs need updates too?"
Notice recurring needs, offer automation.
"Third time this week you've needed this query.
Want me to save it as a snippet?"
Help with context switches gracefully.
"Before switching: current PR is ready for review,
tests passing, 2 TODOs marked for later."
Catch issues before they become problems.
"Heads up: this change might affect the mobile layout.
Want me to check?"
| Confidence | Action |
|---|---|
| High (>80%) | Prepare resource, gentle offer |
| Medium (50-80%) | Ask clarifying question first |
| Low (<50%) | Stay reactive, wait for explicit ask |
Adapt proactivity level to user preference:
// From user-profile.json
{
"proactiveSuggestions": true, // Master switch
"questionFrequency": "moderate", // minimal | moderate | frequent
"detailLevel": "balanced" // Affects suggestion depth
}
| Anti-Pattern | Why It's Bad | Better Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Constant suggestions | Feels like nagging | Batch suggestions, wait for pauses |
| Repeating dismissed help | Ignores user preference | Track rejections, back off |
| Acting without asking | Violates trust | Always offer, never force |
| Generic suggestions | Not valuable | Make them context-specific |
| Interrupting flow | Breaks concentration | Wait for natural breakpoints |
The best help is help you didn't have to ask for.