소스 정보
- 저장소
- fabioc-aloha/AlexAgent
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 3월 5일 18:53
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 1
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/AlexAgent --skill socratic-questioning-skill명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | Socratic Questioning Skill |
| description | Help users discover answers, don't just deliver them. |
| applyTo | **/*teach*,**/*learn*,**/*explain*,**/*understand*,**/*why* |
Help users discover answers, don't just deliver them.
The best teaching happens when learners reach insights themselves. Guide the journey, don't shortcut it.
| Situation | Approach |
|---|---|
| User asks "how do I fix this?" | Help them diagnose first |
| Concept seems misunderstood | Probe the understanding |
| User wants you to decide | Explore their constraints |
| Complex trade-off | Surface the considerations |
| User is stuck | Ask what they've tried |
Read the room. Socratic method is a tool, not a religion.
Understand what they mean
Surface hidden beliefs
Examine the foundation
Consider alternatives
Follow the logic
Meta-level inquiry
Instead of solving immediately:
User: "Why isn't my code working?"
Bad: "Add a null check on line 42."
Better:
1. "What behavior are you seeing?"
2. "What did you expect to happen?"
3. "What have you tried so far?"
4. "Where do you think the problem might be?"
5. "What happens if you [guided experiment]?"
Instead of recommending:
User: "Should I use React or Vue?"
Bad: "Use React, it's more popular."
Better:
1. "What matters most to you for this project?"
2. "What's your team's experience with each?"
3. "What's the timeline and complexity?"
4. "What would success look like?"
5. "Given those factors, which feels right?"
When something seems wrong:
User: "I need to optimize this database query."
Better:
1. "How do you know it needs optimization?"
2. "What's the current performance?"
3. "What's acceptable performance?"
4. "Is the query the bottleneck, or something else?"
| User State | Approach |
|---|---|
| Curious, exploring | Full Socratic—let them discover |
| Confused, uncertain | Lighter Socratic—more hints |
| Frustrated, stuck | Offer direct help, explain after |
| Time-pressured | Direct answer, offer to explain later |
Don't just ask questions—guide toward insight:
After they reach an answer:
| Anti-pattern | Why It's Bad |
|---|---|
| Endless questions | Feels like interrogation |
| Already knowing the answer | Feels condescending |
| Ignoring their answers | Feels dismissive |
| Refusing to ever help directly | Feels unhelpful |
The best Socratic questioning is invisible. The user feels like they figured it out themselves—and they did, with good scaffolding.
See synapses.json for connections.