소스 정보
- 저장소
- franklee16/academic-research-skills
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 4월 26일 14:36
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 211
- 포크
- 28
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill beamer-presentation명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | beamer-presentation |
| description | Create academic presentations in Beamer with professional themes |
| workflow_stage | communication |
| compatibility | ["claude-code","cursor","codex","gemini-cli"] |
| author | Awesome Econ AI Community |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| tags | ["LaTeX","Beamer","presentations","slides"] |
This skill helps economists create professional academic presentations using LaTeX Beamer. It provides templates for conference talks, job market presentations, and seminar presentations with proper structure and clean aesthetics.
Ask the user:
| Duration | Structure |
|---|---|
| 15-20 min | Motivation (2) → Question (1) → Method (2) → Results (3-4) → Conclusion (1) |
| 45-60 min | Add literature review, more results detail, robustness |
| 90 min | Full seminar with theoretical framework, extensive empirics |
\pause or <+-> for complex slides\documentclass[aspectratio=169, 11pt]{beamer}
% ============================================
% THEME AND APPEARANCE
% ============================================
% Clean minimal theme
\usetheme{metropolis}
\usecolortheme{default}
% Or for a more traditional look:
% \usetheme{Madrid}
% \usecolortheme{whale}
% Custom colors
\definecolor{darkblue}{RGB}{0, 51, 102}
\definecolor{lightgray}{RGB}{245, 245, 245}
\setbeamercolor{frametitle}{bg=darkblue, fg=white}
\setbeamercolor{title}{fg=darkblue}
\setbeamercolor{structure}{fg=darkblue}
% Remove navigation symbols
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
% Frame numbers
\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]
% ============================================
% PACKAGES
% ============================================
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.17}
% ============================================
% TITLE PAGE
% ============================================
\title{The Effect of X on Y: \\Evidence from Z}
\subtitle{Short and Descriptive}
\author{Your Name}
\institute{Your University}
\date{Conference Name \\ Month Year}
\begin{document}
% Title slide
\begin{frame}[plain]
\titlepage
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% MOTIVATION (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Motivation: Why This Matters}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1-> \textbf{Big picture:} [One sentence on broad relevance]
\item<2-> \textbf{Specific puzzle:} [What we don't know]
\item<3-> \textbf{Stakes:} [Why should we care?]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\only<4>{
\begin{block}{Key Statistic}
\Large \textbf{X\%} of [outcome] can be explained by [factor]
\end{block}
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{What We Know (and Don't Know)}
\textbf{Previous literature:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Author et al. (2020): Finding 1
\item Other Author (2019): Finding 2
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Gap we fill:}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\textcolor{red}{?}] [Open question our paper addresses]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESEARCH QUESTION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{This Paper}
\begin{center}
\Large
\textbf{Research Question:} \\[1em]
Does [X] cause [Y]? \\[2em]
\end{center}
\textbf{Preview of findings:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Main result in plain language
\item Key magnitude: [Quantitative summary]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% EMPIRICAL STRATEGY (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Data}
\textbf{Sources:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Dataset 1: [Description, years, N]
\item Dataset 2: [Description, matching method]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Sample:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Unit of observation: [What is an observation?]
\item Final sample: [N] observations, [Time period]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Identification Strategy}
\textbf{Challenge:} [Endogeneity concern in one sentence]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Solution:} We exploit [natural experiment / instrument / RDD]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Key assumption:} [Identification assumption in plain language]
\begin{equation*}
Y_{it} = \alpha + \beta \cdot \text{Treatment}_{it} + \gamma X_{it} + \mu_i + \delta_t + \varepsilon_{it}
\end{equation*}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESULTS (3-5 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Main Result}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{figures/main_result.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.5em}
\textbf{Takeaway:} [One sentence interpretation]
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Main Result: Regression Table}
\begin{table}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\toprule
& (1) & (2) & (3) \\
& OLS & + Controls & + FE \\
\midrule
Treatment & 0.052*** & 0.048*** & 0.041** \\
& (0.012) & (0.011) & (0.015) \\
\midrule
Controls & No & Yes & Yes \\
Fixed Effects & No & No & Yes \\
N & 10,000 & 9,850 & 9,850 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\textbf{Economic magnitude:} 1 SD increase in X $\rightarrow$ Y\% increase in outcome
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Robustness Checks}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\checkmark] Alternative specifications
\item[\checkmark] Placebo tests
\item[\checkmark] Different sample cuts
\item[\checkmark] [Other relevant checks]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
$\rightarrow$ Results robust across specifications
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% CONCLUSION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Takeaways}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Finding 1:} [Main result]
\item \textbf{Finding 2:} [Secondary result]
\item \textbf{Implication:} [Policy/theory takeaway]
\end{enumerate}
\vspace{2em}
\begin{center}
\Large Thank you! \\[0.5em]
\normalsize your.email@university.edu
\end{center}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% APPENDIX
% ============================================
\appendix
\begin{frame}[noframenumbering]{Appendix: Additional Results}
[Backup slides for Q\&A]
\end{frame}
\end{document}
| Audience | Theme | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Academic | metropolis | Clean, modern, minimal |
| Conference | Madrid | Traditional, professional |
| Job market | default with custom colors | Safe, customizable |
| Policy | CambridgeUS | Authoritative look |
\pause