Guidance for SPR and BLI binding characterization experiments. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.
설치
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
Guidance for SPR and BLI binding characterization experiments. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.
license
MIT
category
experimental
tags
["binding","spr","bli","validation"]
Binding Characterization: SPR and BLI
SPR vs BLI Decision Matrix
Factor
Choose SPR
Choose BLI
Sensitivity
Small molecules, fragments (<500 Da)
Large complexes, antibodies
Throughput
Low-medium (serial)
High (96-well parallel)
Sample purity
Required (clogs fluidics)
Tolerates crude lysates
Kinetic resolution
Higher (better for fast kinetics)
Lower
Mass transport
More sensitive (may distort kon)
Less sensitive
Maintenance
High (fluidics system)
Low (dip-and-read)
Sample consumption
Higher (continuous flow)
Lower
Cost per experiment
Lower chip cost, higher run cost
Higher tip cost, lower run cost
Key differences
SPR (Surface Plasmon Resonance)
Mechanism: Detects refractive index changes at gold surface
Surface: Gold chip with dextran matrix (CM5, CM7, etc.)
Flow: Continuous microfluidics
Best for: Small molecules, high-affinity, precise kon/koff