| name | desloppify |
| description | Codebase health scanner and technical debt tracker. Use when the user asks about code quality, technical debt, dead code, large files, god classes, duplicate functions, code smells, naming issues, import cycles, or coupling problems. Also use when asked for a health score, what to fix next, or to create a cleanup plan. Supports 29 languages.
|
| allowed-tools | Bash(desloppify *) |
Desloppify
1. Your Job
Maximise the strict score honestly. Your main cycle: scan → plan → execute → rescan. Follow the scan output's INSTRUCTIONS FOR AGENTS — don't substitute your own analysis.
Don't be lazy. Do large refactors and small detailed fixes with equal energy. If it takes touching 20 files, touch 20 files. If it's a one-line change, make it. No task is too big or too small — fix things properly, not minimally.
2. The Workflow
Three phases, repeated as a cycle.
Phase 1: Scan and review — understand the codebase
desloppify scan --path .
desloppify status
The scan will tell you if subjective dimensions need review. Follow its instructions. To trigger a review manually:
desloppify review --prepare
Phase 2: Plan — decide what to work on
After reviews, triage stages and plan creation appear in the execution queue surfaced by next. Complete them in order — next tells you what each stage expects in the --report:
desloppify next
desloppify plan triage --stage observe --report "themes and root causes..."
desloppify plan triage --stage reflect --report "comparison against completed work..."
desloppify plan triage --stage organize --report "summary of priorities..."
desloppify plan triage --complete --strategy "execution plan..."
For automated triage: desloppify plan triage --run-stages --runner codex (Codex) or --runner claude (Claude). Options: --only-stages, --dry-run, --stage-timeout-seconds.
Then shape the queue. The plan shapes everything next gives you — next is the execution queue, not the full backlog. Don't skip this step.
desloppify plan
desloppify plan queue
desloppify plan reorder <pat> top
desloppify plan cluster create <name>
desloppify plan focus <cluster>
desloppify plan skip <pat>
Phase 3: Execute — grind the queue to completion
Trust the plan and execute. Don't rescan mid-queue — finish the queue first.
Branch first. Create a dedicated branch — never commit health work directly to main:
git checkout -b desloppify/code-health
desloppify config set commit_pr 42
The loop:
desloppify next
git add <files> && git commit -m "desloppify: fix 3 deferred_import findings"
desloppify plan commit-log record
git push -u origin desloppify/code-health
Score may temporarily drop after fixes — cascade effects are normal, keep going.
If next suggests an auto-fixer, run desloppify autofix <fixer> --dry-run to preview, then apply.
When the queue is clear, go back to Phase 1. New issues will surface, cascades will have resolved, priorities will have shifted. This is the cycle.
3. Reference
Key concepts
- Tiers: T1 auto-fix → T2 quick manual → T3 judgment call → T4 major refactor.
- Auto-clusters: related findings are auto-grouped in
next. Drill in with next --cluster <name>.
- Zones: production/script (scored), test/config/generated/vendor (not scored). Fix with
zone set.
- Wontfix cost: widens the lenient↔strict gap. Challenge past decisions when the gap grows.
Scoring
Overall score = 25% mechanical + 75% subjective.
- Mechanical (25%): auto-detected issues — duplication, dead code, smells, unused imports, security. Fixed by changing code and rescanning.
- Subjective (75%): design quality review — naming, error handling, abstractions, clarity. Starts at 0% until reviewed. The scan will prompt you when a review is needed.
- Strict score is the north star: wontfix items count as open. The gap between overall and strict is your wontfix debt.
- Score types: overall (lenient), strict (wontfix counts), objective (mechanical only), verified (confirmed fixes only).
Reviews
Four paths to get subjective scores:
-
Local runner (Codex): desloppify review --run-batches --runner codex --parallel --scan-after-import — automated end-to-end.
-
Local runner (Claude): desloppify review --prepare → launch parallel subagents → desloppify review --import merged.json — see skill doc overlay for details.
-
Cloud/external: desloppify review --external-start --external-runner claude → follow session template → --external-submit.
-
Manual path: desloppify review --prepare → review per dimension → desloppify review --import file.json.
-
Import first, fix after — import creates tracked state entries for correlation.
-
Target-matching scores trigger auto-reset to prevent gaming. Use the blind-review workflow described in your agent overlay doc (e.g. docs/CLAUDE.md, docs/HERMES.md).
-
Even moderate scores (60-80) dramatically improve overall health.
-
Stale dimensions auto-surface in next — just follow the queue.
Integrity rules: Score from evidence only — no prior chat context, score history, or target-threshold anchoring. When evidence is mixed, score lower and explain uncertainty. Assess every requested dimension; never drop one.
Review output format
Return machine-readable JSON for review imports. For --external-submit, include session from the generated template:
{
"session": {
"id": "<session_id_from_template>",
"token": "<session_token_from_template>"
},
"assessments": {
"<dimension_from_query>": 0
},
"findings": [
{
"dimension": "<dimension_from_query>",
"identifier": "short_id",
"summary": "one-line defect summary",
"related_files": ["relative/path/to/file.py"],
"evidence": ["specific code observation"],
"suggestion": "concrete fix recommendation",
"confidence": "high|medium|low"
}
]
}
findings MUST match query.system_prompt exactly (including related_files, evidence, and suggestion). Use "findings": [] when no defects found. Import is fail-closed: invalid findings abort unless --allow-partial is passed. Assessment scores are auto-applied from trusted internal or cloud session imports. Legacy --attested-external remains supported.
Import paths
- Robust session flow (recommended):
desloppify review --external-start --external-runner claude → use generated prompt/template → run printed --external-submit command.
- Durable scored import (legacy):
desloppify review --import findings.json --attested-external --attest "I validated this review was completed without awareness of overall score and is unbiased."
- Findings-only fallback:
desloppify review --import findings.json
Reviewer agent prompt
Runners that support agent definitions (Cursor, Copilot, Gemini) can create a dedicated reviewer agent. Use this system prompt:
You are a code quality reviewer. You will be given a codebase path, a set of
dimensions to score, and what each dimension means. Read the code, score each
dimension 0-100 from evidence only, and return JSON in the required format.
Do not anchor to target thresholds. When evidence is mixed, score lower and
explain uncertainty.
See your editor's overlay section below for the agent config format.
Plan commands
desloppify plan reorder <cluster> top
desloppify plan reorder <a> <b> top
desloppify plan reorder <pat> before -t X
desloppify plan cluster reorder a,b top
desloppify plan resolve <pat>
desloppify plan reopen <pat>
desloppify backlog
Commit tracking
desloppify plan commit-log
desloppify plan commit-log record
desloppify plan commit-log record --note "why"
desloppify plan commit-log record --only "smells::*"
desloppify plan commit-log history
desloppify plan commit-log pr
desloppify config set commit_tracking_enabled false
After resolving findings as fixed, the tool shows uncommitted work, committed history, and a suggested commit message. After committing externally, run record to move findings from uncommitted to committed and auto-update the linked PR description.
Quick reference
desloppify next --count 5
desloppify next --cluster <name>
desloppify backlog --count 5
desloppify show <pattern>
desloppify show --status open
desloppify plan skip --permanent "<id>" --note "reason" --attest "..."
desloppify exclude <path>
desloppify config show
desloppify scan --path . --reset-subjective
4. Fix Tool Issues Upstream
When desloppify itself appears wrong or inconsistent — a bug, a bad detection, a crash, confusing output — fix it and open a PR. If you can't confidently fix it, file an issue instead.
Fix and PR (preferred)
Clone the tool repo to a temp directory, make the fix there, and verify it works against the project you're scanning before pushing.
git clone https://github.com/peteromallet/desloppify.git /tmp/desloppify-fix
cd /tmp/desloppify-fix
git checkout -b fix/<short-description>
Make your changes, then run the test suite and verify the fix against the original project:
python -m pytest desloppify/tests/ -q
python -m desloppify scan --path <project-root>
Once it looks good, push and open a PR:
git add <files> && git commit -m "fix: <what and why>"
git push -u origin fix/<short-description>
gh pr create --title "fix: <short description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Problem
<what went wrong — include the command and output>
## Fix
<what you changed and why>
EOF
)"
Clean up after: rm -rf /tmp/desloppify-fix
File an issue (fallback)
If the fix is unclear or the change needs discussion, open an issue at https://github.com/peteromallet/desloppify/issues with a minimal repro: command, path, expected output, actual output.
Prerequisite
command -v desloppify >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "desloppify: installed" || echo "NOT INSTALLED — run: pip install --upgrade git+https://github.com/peteromallet/desloppify.git"
Codex Overlay
This is the canonical Codex overlay used by the README install command.
- Prefer first-class batch runs:
desloppify review --run-batches --runner codex --parallel --scan-after-import.
- The command writes immutable packet snapshots under
.desloppify/review_packets/holistic_packet_*.json; use those for reproducible retries.
- Keep reviewer input scoped to the immutable packet and the source files named in each batch.
- If a batch fails, retry only that slice with
desloppify review --run-batches --packet <packet.json> --only-batches <idxs>.
- Manual override is safety-scoped: you cannot combine it with
--allow-partial, and provisional manual scores expire on the next scan unless replaced by trusted internal or attested-external imports.
Triage workflow
Prefer automated triage: desloppify plan triage --run-stages --runner codex
Options: --only-stages observe,reflect (subset), --dry-run (prompts only), --stage-timeout-seconds N (per-stage).
Run artifacts go to .desloppify/triage_runs/<timestamp>/ — each run gets its own directory with run.log (live timestamped events), run_summary.json, per-stage prompts/, output/, and logs/. Check run.log to diagnose stalls or failures. Re-running resumes from the last confirmed stage.
If automated triage stalls, check run.log for the last event, then use desloppify plan triage --stage-prompt <stage> to get the full prompt with gate rules.