Skip to main content

langchain4j-mcp-server-patterns

Provides LangChain4j patterns for implementing MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, creating Java AI tools, exposing tool calling capabilities, and integrating MCP clients with AI services. Use when building a Java MCP server, implementing tool calling in Java, connecting LangChain4j to external MCP servers, or securing tool exposure for agent workflows.

소스 정보

저장소
giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit
최근 소스 활동
2026년 3월 24일 08:27
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
355
포크
41

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
4 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
langchain4j-mcp-server-patterns
description
Provides LangChain4j patterns for implementing MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, creating Java AI tools, exposing tool calling capabilities, and integrating MCP clients with AI services. Use when building a Java MCP server, implementing tool calling in Java, connecting LangChain4j to external MCP servers, or securing tool exposure for agent workflows.
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, WebFetch
# LangChain4j MCP Server Implementation Patterns ## Overview Use this skill to design and implement Model Context Protocol (MCP) integrations with LangChain4j. The main concerns are: - defining a clean tool, resource, and prompt surface - choosing the right transport and bootstrap model - filtering unsafe capabilities before exposing them to agents or applications Keep `SKILL.md` focused on the implementation flow. Use the bundled references for expanded examples and API-level detail. ## When to Use Use this skill when: - building a Java MCP server that exposes tools, resources, or prompts - integrating LangChain4j with one or more external MCP servers - wiring MCP support into a Spring Boot application - filtering available tools by tenant, user role, or runtime context - adding observability, resilience, and safe failure handling around MCP interactions - reviewing an MCP integration for prompt-injection and side-effect risks Typical trigger phrases include `langchain4j mcp`, `java mcp server`, `mcp tool provider`, `spring boot mcp`, and `connect langchain4j to mcp`. ## Instructions ### 1. Design the MCP surface before writing code Decide what the server should expose: - tools for actions with clear inputs and side effects - resources for read-only or structured data access - prompts only when a reusable template adds real value Keep names stable, descriptions concrete, and schemas small enough for a client or model to understand quickly. ### 2. Implement providers with narrow responsibilities Use separate classes for each concern: - tool provider for executable functions - resource provider for discoverable and readable data - prompt provider for reusable prompt templates Validate arguments before execution and return clear error messages for invalid input or unavailable dependencies. ### 3. Choose the transport intentionally Use: - stdio for local integrations, CLI tools, and sidecar processes - HTTP or SSE for remote or shared services Pin external server versions and document how the process is started, authenticated, and monitored. ### 4. Bridge MCP into LangChain4j carefully When consuming MCP servers from LangChain4j: - initialize clients during application startup - cache tool lists only when stale metadata is acceptable - filter tools by trust level, environment, or user permissions - fail closed for dangerous tools rather than exposing everything by default ### 5. Add resilience and security controls At minimum: - bound execution time for external calls - log server and tool identity for each failure - sanitize content returned by external resources before using it downstream - isolate privileged tools behind allowlists, qualifiers, or role checks ### 6. Validate the full workflow Before shipping: - verify tool discovery and invocation with a real MCP client - test disconnected or slow server behavior - confirm that tool filtering matches the intended authorization model - check that prompts and resources do not leak secrets or unsafe instructions ## Examples ### Example 1: Minimal tool provider and stdio server bootstrap ```java class WeatherToolProvider implements ToolProvider { @Override public List<ToolSpecification> listTools() { return List.of( ToolSpecification.builder() .name("get_weather") .description("Return the current weather for a city") .inputSchema(Map.of( "type", "object", "properties", Map.of( "city", Map.of("type", "string") ), "required", List.of("city") )) .build() ); } @Override public String executeTool(String name, String arguments) { return weatherService.lookup(arguments); } } MCPServer server = MCPServer.builder() .server(new StdioServer.Builder()) .addToolProvider(new WeatherToolProvider()) .build(); server.start(); ``` Use this pattern for local tool execution or a sidecar process started by another application. ### Example 2: Expose MCP tools to a LangChain4j AI service with filtering ```java McpToolProvider toolProvider = McpToolProvider.builder() .mcpClients(mcpClients) .failIfOneServerFails(false) .filter((client, tool) -> !tool.name().startsWith("admin_")) .build(); Assistant assistant = AiServices.builder(Assistant.class) .chatModel(chatModel) .toolProvider(toolProvider) .build(); ``` Use this pattern when you want LangChain4j to consume external MCP servers while still enforcing trust boundaries. ## Best Practices - Keep each tool focused, deterministic, and well-described. - Prefer explicit schemas over free-form string arguments. - Separate read-only resources from tools with side effects. - Filter or disable privileged tools by default. - Pin external MCP server packages or container versions. - Capture metrics for connection failures, invocation latency, and tool error rates. - Store longer protocol details and framework-specific wiring in `references/` instead of expanding `SKILL.md` indefinitely. ## Constraints and Warnings - External MCP servers are untrusted integration boundaries and may expose malicious or misleading content. - Do not forward raw resource content directly into autonomous tool execution without validation. - Some LangChain4j and MCP APIs evolve quickly; adapt class names and builders to the versions already used in the project. - Long-running or stateful tools need explicit timeout, cancellation, and cleanup behavior. - Stdio-based servers require process lifecycle management and robust logging. ## References - `references/examples.md` - `references/api-reference.md` ## Related Skills - `prompt-engineering` - `spring-ai` - `clean-architecture`
GitHub에서 보기