Skip to main content

density-driven-multi-agent-control

Stochastic Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC) for multi-agent systems. A rigorous Lagrangian framework for decentralized non-uniform area coverage using Wasserstein distance minimization. Use for: multi-agent coverage control, swarm robotics, distributed optimization, stochastic MPC, area coverage missions with spatial priority. Activation: D2OC, density-driven control, multi-agent coverage, swarm control, Wasserstein distance control.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
hiyenwong/ai_collection
최근 소스 활동
2026년 6월 4일 13:32
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
2
포크
0

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
density-driven-multi-agent-control
description
Stochastic Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC) for multi-agent systems. A rigorous Lagrangian framework for decentralized non-uniform area coverage using Wasserstein distance minimization. Use for: multi-agent coverage control, swarm robotics, distributed optimization, stochastic MPC, area coverage missions with spatial priority. Activation: D2OC, density-driven control, multi-agent coverage, swarm control, Wasserstein distance control.
# Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC) Stochastic Density-Driven Optimal Control methodology for decentralized non-uniform area coverage in multi-agent systems. ## Overview D²OC addresses the decentralized non-uniform area coverage problem for multi-agent systems, critical for missions with high spatial priority and resource constraints. Unlike existing density-based methods that rely on computationally heavy Eulerian PDE solvers or heuristic planning, D²OC provides a rigorous Lagrangian framework bridging individual agent dynamics and collective distribution matching. ## Core Concepts ### Problem Formulation - **Objective**: Drive time-averaged empirical distribution of agents to match a non-parametric target density - **Dynamics**: Stochastic Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) multi-agent systems - **Cost**: Wasserstein distance between current and target distributions - **Approach**: Stochastic MPC-like formulation with formal convergence guarantees ### Key Innovations 1. **Lagrangian Framework**: Bridges individual agent dynamics with collective behavior 2. **Wasserstein Distance**: Used as running cost for distribution matching 3. **Convergence Guarantees**: Formal proof via reachability analysis 4. **Robustness**: Bounded tracking error under process and measurement noise ## Methodology ### Mathematical Framework ``` Given: - N agents with stochastic LTI dynamics: x_i(t+1) = A x_i(t) + B u_i(t) + w_i(t) - Target density ρ_target(x) (non-parametric) - Current empirical distribution: ρ_emp(x,t) = (1/N) Σ δ(x - x_i(t)) Objective: Minimize Wasserstein distance W(ρ_emp, ρ_target) over time horizon ``` ### Algorithm Steps 1. **State Measurement**: Collect current agent positions/states 2. **Distribution Estimation**: Compute empirical distribution from agent states 3. **Wasserstein Calculation**: Compute distance to target density 4. **MPC Optimization**: Solve stochastic MPC problem minimizing Wasserstein cost 5. **Control Application**: Apply optimal controls to each agent 6. **Iterate**: Repeat at next time step ### Convergence Properties - **Formal Guarantee**: Time-averaged empirical distribution converges to target density - **Error Bound**: Bounded tracking error under noise - **Decentralized**: Each agent computes control based on local information and density field ## Applications ### Use Cases - **Environmental Monitoring**: Coverage of regions with varying importance - **Search and Rescue**: Prioritized search based on probability maps - **Agricultural Robotics**: Variable-rate application in precision farming - **Surveillance**: Patrolling with non-uniform attention requirements - **Warehouse Robotics**: Spatially-varying task density handling ### Advantages Over Existing Methods | Method | Computational Cost | Convergence Guarantee | Noise Robustness | |--------|-------------------|----------------------|------------------| | Eulerian PDE | High (grid-based) | Limited | Poor | | Heuristic Planning | Medium | None | Variable | | **D²OC** | **Low (Lagrangian)** | **Yes (formal)** | **Strong** | ## Implementation Guidelines ### Prerequisites - Multi-agent system with stochastic LTI dynamics - Target density specification (can be non-parametric) - Wasserstein distance computation capability - MPC solver (can use existing QP solvers) ### Parameter Selection - **Horizon Length**: Trade-off between optimality and computational cost - **Agent Count**: More agents → better density approximation - **Noise Covariance**: Must be accounted for in reachability analysis - **Target Density**: Can be learned from data or specified analytically ### Code Structure ```python class D2OCController: def __init__(self, agents, target_density, horizon): self.agents = agents self.target = target_density self.horizon = horizon def compute_control(self, current_states): # 1. Estimate current empirical distribution rho_emp = self.empirical_distribution(current_states) # 2. Solve MPC minimizing Wasserstein distance controls = self.solve_wasserstein_mpc(rho_emp, self.target) return controls def empirical_distribution(self, states): # Kernel density estimation or particle representation pass def solve_wasserstein_mpc(self, rho_current, rho_target): # QP formulation with Wasserstein as cost pass ``` ## Theoretical Foundations ### Reachability Analysis The convergence guarantee is established through: - **Reachability Set**: Characterize states reachable under stochastic dynamics - **Invariant Sets**: Find density-invariant sets under control - **Contraction**: Show Wasserstein distance contracts over time ### Wasserstein Distance in Control Why Wasserstein distance: - **Metric Properties**: Proper distance metric on probability space - **Interpretability**: Earth-mover's intuition for distribution matching - **Computational Tractability**: Can be computed via linear programming - **Robustness**: Handles non-parametric distributions naturally ## References - **Paper**: "Density-Driven Optimal Control: Convergence Guarantees for Stochastic LTI Multi-Agent Systems" by Kooktae Lee (arXiv:2604.08495v1, 2026) - **Category**: math.OC, cs.MA, cs.RO, eess.SY ## Related Skills - **discounted-mpc-robust-control**: For MPC under model mismatch - **bandwidth-reduction-packetized-mpc**: For networked multi-agent control - **decentralized-stochastic-momentum-admm**: For distributed optimization ## Activation Keywords - density-driven control - D2OC - multi-agent coverage - swarm control - Wasserstein distance control - decentralized coverage - non-uniform area coverage - density-based control
GitHub에서 보기