Skip to main content

align

Create or review ALIGN.md through a focused conversation about a user's project goals, priorities, preferences, constraints, and decision criteria. Use when the user asks to align expectations, establish project direction, revisit an agreement, or investigate drift from existing alignment. Do not start a new interview for routine work already covered by an agreement.

소스 정보

저장소
hmmhmmhm/align.md
최근 소스 활동
2026년 10월 12일 00:34
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
1
포크
0

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
3 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
align
description
Create or review ALIGN.md through a focused conversation about a user's project goals, priorities, preferences, constraints, and decision criteria. Use when the user asks to align expectations, establish project direction, revisit an agreement, or investigate drift from existing alignment. Do not start a new interview for routine work already covered by an agreement.
license
MIT
# Align Help the agent make decisions that reflect the user's judgment. Keep the current agreement in `ALIGN.md`, separate from task lists and general agent instructions. Support one user's alignment with their agents, in new or existing projects of any kind. ## Establish context - Identify the target project and its applicable instructions. Read existing `ALIGN.md`, relevant project documentation, and available conversation context. Treat implementation as evidence of what exists, not proof of what the user wants. Do not import preferences from this skill's source repository. - Check whether the target project is inside a Git work tree, for example with `git -C <project> rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree`. Distinguish no repository from Git being unavailable or access being denied. Do not initialize Git. - If alignment exists, review available changes since its last confirmed alignment, including relevant uncommitted work and decisions. Use Git history when available. Inspect only context that can affect the current judgment. A timestamp alone does not prove that every later change has been reviewed. - Without reliable history, state the limitation and ask only about gaps that matter to the current decision. Do not invent a baseline or create a separate history log. Missing history alone is not a reason to repeat the full interview. ## Choose the next useful action For a new project, clarify purpose, intended users, desired outcomes, and constraints before committing to implementation choices. For an existing project without alignment, summarize the current direction and clarify what the user wants to retain or change. For a project with alignment, apply the current criteria. Raise only meaningful inconsistencies or candidate new criteria, with evidence and a concrete proposed revision. If nothing needs clarification, say so briefly and continue the task. ## Have a focused conversation - Ask 1-3 related, consequential questions at a time. Reuse answers already available; do not ask the user to confirm an unambiguous instruction again. - Cover only relevant gaps: purpose, success criteria, scope and exclusions, priorities, constraints, preferences, things to avoid, and autonomy boundaries. - Turn abstract preferences into concrete choices, especially when time, cost, quality, or other values conflict. Explain a recommendation when helpful. - Label assumptions and unresolved matters. A preference inferred from code, repeated behavior, or an example is a candidate, not an agreement. - Once the essentials are clear, show a concise draft instead of continuing to fill categories. Refine it until the user considers it sufficient. The user may explicitly delegate drafting or storage decisions; honor that scope. ## Save the current agreement Create or update the project-root `ALIGN.md` after the user confirms the draft or clearly authorizes the particular lasting changes. Preserve unrelated content and existing formatting when practical. Use the user's language and the target project's conventions unless they specify otherwise. Keep the document short and usable for decisions. A useful outline is: - Purpose and desired outcomes - Success criteria - Scope and exclusions - Priorities and trade-offs - Constraints, preferences, and autonomy boundaries - Unresolved matters, only when relevant - Last full alignment timestamp Distinguish requirements from default preferences and give a brief reason for important criteria. Keep only current criteria. Use Git history for previous versions; do not embed a changelog or create a parallel alignment history file. Git availability does not itself authorize staging, committing, or publishing. Use the stable footer label `Last aligned:` even when the document body is translated. End with `Last aligned: YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm (time zone)` when the user has confirmed the full agreement. Use a known user time zone and an actual confirmation time. If the zone is unavailable, label UTC explicitly rather than guessing a location. Do not invent a date for an existing undated agreement. Reading, editing, and automatic review are not confirmation. For partial agreement, keep the full timestamp unchanged and annotate only affected criteria with their latest confirmation times. Replace superseded annotations instead of accumulating a log. A draft saved without full confirmation must say `Last aligned: Not yet confirmed.` A full reconfirmation may update the timestamp even when the criteria themselves remain unchanged. ## Connect the agreement to future work After saving an agreement, preserve existing `AGENTS.md` instructions and add a concise reference to `ALIGN.md` with the operating rules below; create `AGENTS.md` if it is absent. Avoid duplicate sections on later invocations. Record these instructions in `AGENTS.md`: 1. Read `ALIGN.md` at the start of work and apply it to scope, key decisions, and result review. Follow the applicable instruction hierarchy. 2. Check available changes and decisions since the last alignment for meaningful drift. Use Git history when available; disclose material gaps. Do not repeat resolved questions without new evidence. 3. Adjust autonomously within existing agreements. When a lasting change is unclear, show the evidence and proposed revision and ask only about the consequential uncertainty. Continue work independent of that decision. 4. Reflect explicit lasting changes without seeking approval again. Do not generalize a one-off exception into a permanent preference, or rewrite agreements to justify the agent's choices or results. 5. Keep current criteria in `ALIGN.md` and previous versions in Git. Update the final timestamp only on full user confirmation; record partial confirmations on affected criteria without advancing it. Do not initialize Git or create an alternative history file unless requested. Check the target agent's actual instruction entrypoint when known. Installing this skill does not guarantee every agent reads `AGENTS.md` or runs it on every task. If another entrypoint is required, connect it with a minimal reference when authorized, preserving its existing instructions. Otherwise state the manual invocation needed. Do not silently install hooks, change global agent settings, or claim automatic enforcement. Finish with the current agreement or changes, any material open question, and the saved paths when applicable. Do not ask for another approval after a clear confirmation just to close the workflow.
GitHub에서 보기