메뉴
Reproduce, isolate, patch, and verify defects with explicit expected-versus-observed behavior.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Analyze CSAT, NPS comments, reviews, and support feedback for sentiment, recurring themes, customer pain, and service improvement actions. Use for customer support and CX feedback reviews.
Create a concise daily briefing from calendar items, tasks, messages, and open decisions. Use at the start of a workday to identify priorities, risks, preparation needs, and follow-ups.
Turn business data, KPI movement, or experiment results into a clear narrative using the what-so what-now what structure, audience calibration, and action-oriented insight. Use when leaders need a data-backed brief, dashboard storyline, or metric interpretation. Do not use for raw statistical modeling with no communication deliverable.
Summarize document-heavy inputs such as memos, policies, PDFs, research notes, proposals, and multi-document packets. Use when users need key points, obligations, questions, and action implications from documents.
Draft clear, professional business emails from rough notes, context, or instructions. Handles cold outreach, internal updates, client responses, and escalation drafts. Use when the work is routine email writing with known context and audience. Do not use for sensitive legal notices, formal regulatory correspondence, or board-level communication without review.
Summarize meeting notes or transcripts into decisions, action items, owners, risks, and follow-up messages. Use after meetings when raw notes need a clean recap.
| name | codexkit-bug-hunt |
| description | Reproduce, isolate, patch, and verify defects with explicit expected-versus-observed behavior. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | verification |
Use this skill when a report says something is broken and you need disciplined debugging rather than guesswork.
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Are all pass/fail criteria applied against the correct standard or rule? |
| Completeness | Were all required dimensions or checklist items evaluated? |
| Context-fit | Does the verification scope match the actual risk level of the deliverable? |
| Consequence | If this passed verification but had a hidden flaw, what is the worst-case impact? |
