hollandkevint

3 diagnostic questions for evaluating data product markets through the arbitrage gap lens. Identifies whether your data product sits on a durable or closing advantage. Use when assessing data product positioning, evaluating market risk, or when someone asks "is AI going to replace this?" or "what's our moat?"

Convert dashboard requests into decision specifications. The missing layer between "build me a dashboard" and "help me decide." Use when receiving dashboard requests, reviewing analytics backlogs, prioritizing data team work, or when someone asks "what dashboard do you need?" Apply this BEFORE building anything.

Decision tree exploration for data product plans. Interview relentlessly about schema decisions, consumer contracts, quality SLAs, and delivery choices. Use when planning a data product, designing a schema, choosing a delivery method, or when someone asks "grill me on this data product" or "what am I missing in this design?"

Discover what internal data consumers actually need. Adapted Mom Test and JTBD for data teams. Use when conducting user research, interviewing stakeholders, gathering consumer requirements, running discovery sessions, or when someone asks "what do they need?" or "how do I figure out what to build?"

First-principles reasoning for data product decisions. Frames problems as data products, not dashboards or pipelines. Use when evaluating data product strategy, making build-vs-buy decisions, scoping data product features, assessing product-market fit for data offerings, or when someone asks "should we build this data product?"

Score whether a data product idea is worth building before committing resources. Validation scorecard, experiment design, and go/kill decisions. Use when evaluating feasibility, making go/no-go decisions, validating demand, sizing bets, or when someone asks "is this worth building?" or "should we invest in this?"

Position data teams as strategic partners, not order-takers. The organizational "why" behind doing discovery work. Use when discussing team positioning, value exchange, demand shaping, escaping the order-taker trap, or when someone asks "how do we stop being order-takers?" or "how does the data team become strategic?"

Convert raw discovery notes into structured insights using atomic research methods adapted for data products. Use when synthesizing findings, reviewing evidence, summarizing research, writing problem briefs, or when someone asks "what did we learn?" or "what does the evidence say?"

Capture a just-made decision into one durable record so the reasoning survives the session. Writes a single markdown file to the project's decisions/ folder: the call, the reasoning, the weakest assumption, what would change the verdict, and when to reuse the pattern. Checks for an existing record on the same decision and updates it instead of creating a near-duplicate. Activates on "codify this decision", "record this decision", "save the decision record", "make this decision durable", or right after a kill-go verdict, decision-brief, or /decide session.

7-move decision gate for AI deployment. Prevents early promise from becoming unquestioned infrastructure. Based on Stuart Winter-Tear's AI Graduation Path. Activates on "AI deployment", "graduation", "should we scale this AI", "pilot to production", "AI governance", "prove this works", or "when is this ready?"

3 diagnostic questions for evaluating any industry, market, or business model through the lens of arbitrage gaps. Identifies durable advantages vs. closing ones. Based on Nate Jones' Arbitrage Gap Framework. Activates on "arbitrage", "competitive advantage", "moat", "durable advantage", "market gap", "industry analysis", or "what gap am I exploiting?"

Extract and rank assumptions from any plan, idea, or strategy. Identifies what to test first. Anti-sycophancy tool — surfaces beliefs the user treats as facts. Activates on "what am I assuming", "assumptions", "what could go wrong", "blind spots", "stress test my thinking", or "what haven't I considered?"

A 20-minute pressure test for B2B ideas, positioning angles, offers, content theses, product bets, and client recommendations. Built for PMMs, product managers, founders, consultants, writers, and editors who need a strong sounding board before committing. Activates on "vet this idea", "pressure-test this angle", "should I pursue this", "is this positioning any good", "validate this offer", or "help me decide if this is worth it."

One-page decision brief that passes the Simple/Surprising/Easy test. Turns a messy decision into a constraint that generates action. Based on Alex MH Smith's creative brief framework. Activates on "write a brief", "decision brief", "one-pager", "clarify the direction", "what's the constraint", or "make this simple."

7-step human-centered design process. Context, empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test, iterate. Lightweight version of full design thinking for strategic decisions. Adapted from BMAD Creative Intelligence Suite (Maya). Activates on "design thinking", "user-centered", "empathy mapping", "how would users feel", "design this experience", or "human-centered."

Decision tree exploration through relentless interviewing. Forces shared understanding before action. Use when planning features, evaluating strategies, making hiring decisions, designing products, or any time you need exhaustive clarity before committing. Activates on "grill me", "interview me", "challenge this plan", "walk me through", "pressure test", "poke holes", or "what am I missing?"

Work a build idea or design decision through with the agent, grounded in the live repo. Walks the decision tree one branch at a time (recommended answer first), reads CLAUDE.md / docs/solutions/ / actual source to ground and cross-check claims, and captures resolved decisions into docs/solutions/ as it goes. Use when shaping a feature, schema change, or architecture call before writing code, or when you want shared understanding plus a durable record. Triggers on "grill with docs", "grill this against the codebase", "work this idea through", "let's design X", or "pressure-test this against the repo".

UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 9 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient. Integrations: shadcn/ui MCP for component search and examples.

Unified testing commands and patterns across frontend and backend.