원클릭으로 Manus에서 모든 스킬 실행

ha-review

스타88,938

포크38,068

업데이트2026년 7월 2일 19:46

Reviews Home Assistant code changes and provides constructive feedback. Should be used when a review is requested to provide a consistent review behavior and output format. This skill can be used for code reviews in general, not just for GitHub pull requests.

설치

Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.

Manus에서 실행

출처

home-assistant

home-assistant/core

GitHub 저장소 열기 Creator 저장소 보기

다운로드

Manus에서 실행

Review Code Changes

Analyze the code changes for:

Code quality and style consistency
Potential bugs or issues
Performance implications
Security concerns
Test coverage
Documentation updates if needed

Verification:

After the review, run parallel subagents for each finding to double-check it.
Spawn up to a maximum of 10 parallel subagents at a time.
Gather the results from the subagents and summarize them in the final review comments.

IMPORTANT:

Just review. DO NOT make any changes.
Be constructive and specific in your comments.
Suggest improvements where appropriate.
No need to run tests or linters, just review the code changes.
No need to highlight things that are already good.

Output format:

List specific comments for each file/line that needs attention.
In the end, summarize with an overall assessment (approve, request changes, or comment) and bullet point list of changes suggested, if any.
- Example output:
```
Overall assessment: request changes.
- [CRITICAL] sensor.py:143 - Memory leak
- [PROBLEM] data_processing.py:87 - Inefficient algorithm
- [SUGGESTION] test_init.py:45 - Improve x variable name
```
- Make sure to include the file and line number when possible in the bullet points.

이 저장소의 다른 Skills

같은 저장소

ha-pr-comment-audit

home-assistant/core

Audits the review comment threads on a Home Assistant GitHub pull request, flagging unaddressed comments and requests for clarification. Use when checking whether PR feedback has been handled, either standalone or as part of a full PR review.

2026-07-0788.9k

ha-pr-reviewer

home-assistant/core

Reviews Home Assistant GitHub pull requests and provides feedback comments. This is the top skill to use for reviewing Pull Requests from GitHub.

2026-07-0788.9k

bump-dependency

home-assistant/core

Bumps a Python package dependency across Home Assistant Core integrations, regenerates core requirement files, runs verification tests and prek lint, and prepares a pull request with proper release/compare links.

2026-06-2988.9k

ha-integration-knowledge

home-assistant/core

Everything you need to know to build, test and review Home Assistant Integrations. If you're looking at an integration, you must use this as your primary reference.

2026-05-2888.9k

name	ha-review
description	Reviews Home Assistant code changes and provides constructive feedback. Should be used when a review is requested to provide a consistent review behavior and output format. This skill can be used for code reviews in general, not just for GitHub pull requests.

Review Code Changes

Analyze the code changes for:

Code quality and style consistency
Potential bugs or issues
Performance implications
Security concerns
Test coverage
Documentation updates if needed

Verification:

After the review, run parallel subagents for each finding to double-check it.
Spawn up to a maximum of 10 parallel subagents at a time.
Gather the results from the subagents and summarize them in the final review comments.

IMPORTANT:

Just review. DO NOT make any changes.
Be constructive and specific in your comments.
Suggest improvements where appropriate.
No need to run tests or linters, just review the code changes.
No need to highlight things that are already good.

Output format:

List specific comments for each file/line that needs attention.
In the end, summarize with an overall assessment (approve, request changes, or comment) and bullet point list of changes suggested, if any.
- Example output:
```
Overall assessment: request changes.
- [CRITICAL] sensor.py:143 - Memory leak
- [PROBLEM] data_processing.py:87 - Inefficient algorithm
- [SUGGESTION] test_init.py:45 - Improve x variable name
```
- Make sure to include the file and line number when possible in the bullet points.