| name | outcome-drift-audit |
| description | Audit Miadi work against explicit STCKin and context-layer outcomes so plausible scaffolds do not pass as successful delivery. |
Outcome Drift Audit
Use this skill when a draft sounds coherent but you need to know whether it actually satisfies the intended outcomes named in the corpus.
Outcome anchors to check
- STCKin remains part of the STC bot family.
- STCKin keeps its WEST / integration-reflection position.
- Context-layer language preserves Miadi's downstream consumption relationship to AvaLangStack.
- Promotion decisions respect
provenance -> spec -> wiki.
- Retrieval/context-layer concerns stay distinct from wiki explanation.
- Outputs are durable enough to support later RISE and wiki drafting waves.
Audit steps
- Collect the explicit outcome statements from prompts, reports, rispecs, or wiki pages.
- Gather the current evidence for each outcome.
- Mark whether the outcome is:
- met
- partial
- asserted-only
- contradicted
- Explain the drift or missing proof.
- State the consequence for revision and promotion.
Output format
Produce a table:
| Outcome | Intended source | Evidence found | Status | Drift or gap | Required action |
|---|
Then add a short summary:
- strongest drift found
- most important correction
- whether promotion should be blocked