소스 정보
- 저장소
- jmagly/aiwg
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 5월 8일 17:47
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 178
- 포크
- 26
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg --skill soul-validate명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
WCAG accessibility analysis for color palettes including contrast ratios, compliance checking, and remediation suggestions. Use when user needs to verify colors meet accessibility standards.
Generate, analyze, compare, export, and suggest color palettes using color theory. Use when user asks about colors, palettes, color schemes, or needs help choosing colors for a project.
Research current color trends from Pantone, architecture, film, and design. Use when user asks about trending colors, popular palettes, or wants research-backed color inspiration.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| namespace | aiwg |
| name | soul-validate |
| platforms | ["all"] |
| description | Validate a SOUL.md file against community best practices and quality criteria |
Validate a SOUL.md file against community best practices and quality criteria.
Alternate expressions and non-obvious activations (primary phrases are matched automatically from the skill description):
When triggered, this skill performs a comprehensive quality assessment of a SOUL.md file, checking for completeness, specificity, and effectiveness.
./SOUL.md, ./.aiwg/SOUL.md, or path from user| Section | Required | Quality Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Who I Am | Yes | Specific background, not generic. Mentions concrete experience. |
| Worldview | Yes | Beliefs specific enough to be falsifiable. Not platitudes. |
| Opinions | Yes | Organized by domain. Each opinion could be disagreed with. |
| Standards | Recommended | Concrete bar for completion. Names dangling threads this persona never leaves and how complete-vs-fast tension resolves. Not "I value quality." |
| Vocabulary | Recommended | Actual terms with personal definitions, not categories. |
| Boundaries | Recommended | Concrete refusals, not vague ethical statements. |
| Current Focus | Optional | Active projects, current thinking. Dated or contextual. |
| Influences | Optional | Specific people/works with what was taken from each. |
| Tensions | Optional | Genuine contradictions — shows self-awareness. |
| Pet Peeves | Optional | Specific triggers, not generic annoyances. |
| Interests | Optional | Deep interests that inform cross-domain thinking. |
Backwards compatibility: Souls that predate the Standards section validate with a warning, not an error. Existing souls remain functional; /soul-enhance proposes Standards content. New souls created via /soul-create should populate the section.
"Could someone reading this SOUL.md predict the agent's takes on new, unstated topics?"
Check for vague language patterns that weaken the soul:
| Vague (Fail) | Specific (Pass) |
|---|---|
| "I have nuanced views on X" | "I think X is overrated because Y" |
| "I value quality" | "I'll delay a release to fix a flaky test" |
| "I aim for excellence" | "Done = no dangling threads, real fix not workaround" |
| "I believe in completeness" | "I never ship a fix without a regression test for it" |
| "I'm interested in technology" | "I've spent 10 years on distributed systems" |
| "I believe in best practices" | "Most 'best practices' are cargo cult" |
Flag any sentence that could apply to anyone.
Flag common anti-patterns:
| Anti-Pattern | Example | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Generic positivity | "I'm passionate about helping" | Replace with specific beliefs |
| Exhaustive rules | 50+ boundary statements | Reduce to 5-10 core boundaries |
| No contradictions | Suspiciously coherent persona | Add 2-3 genuine tensions |
| Category-level vocabulary | "technical terms" | List actual terms with definitions |
| Missing opinions | Worldview without takes | Add domain-specific opinions |
Check for recommended companion files:
| File | Purpose | Status |
|---|---|---|
| STYLE.md | Writing patterns | Check if exists |
| examples/good-outputs.md | Calibration examples | Check if exists |
| examples/bad-outputs.md | Anti-pattern examples | Check if exists |
Soul Validation Report
=======================
File: ./SOUL.md (~2,847 tokens)
Section Completeness
---------------------
✓ Who I Am Present, specific
✓ Worldview Present, 4 falsifiable beliefs
✓ Opinions Present, organized by 3 domains
⚠ Standards Missing — what's this persona's bar for "done"? (warning, not error)
✓ Vocabulary Present, 12 terms defined
✗ Boundaries Missing — what will the agent refuse?
✓ Current Focus Present
✓ Influences Present, 5 named with takeaways
✗ Tensions Missing — what contradictions exist?
✓ Pet Peeves Present, 4 specific triggers
Quality Tests
--------------
✓ Prediction test Opinions are interpolatable
⚠ Specificity test 2 vague statements found:
Line 14: "I value clean code" → too generic, what specifically?
Line 31: "I have experience with many frameworks" → which ones?
✓ Context budget ~2,847 tokens (under 5K limit)
✓ Anti-patterns None detected
Companion Files
----------------
✗ STYLE.md Not found
✗ examples/good-outputs.md Not found
✗ examples/bad-outputs.md Not found
Score: 7/10
Recommendations
----------------
1. Add a Boundaries section — define 5-10 concrete refusals
2. Add a Tensions section — list 2-3 genuine contradictions
3. Fix vague statements on lines 14 and 31
4. Consider creating calibration examples (good-outputs.md)
5. Consider creating a STYLE.md companion for writing patterns
Run /soul-enhance to auto-improve these issues.
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Production-ready. Distinctive, interpolatable, well-bounded. |
| 7-8 | Good foundation. Missing sections or minor vagueness. |
| 5-6 | Needs work. Multiple missing sections or pervasive vagueness. |
| 3-4 | Weak. Mostly generic. Fails prediction test. |
| 1-2 | Placeholder. Not functional as a soul file. |
After /soul-create, automatically offer validation:
SOUL.md created. Run /soul-validate to check quality.
Before enabling, recommend validation if score < 7:
Warning: SOUL.md scores 5/10 on quality check.
Consider running /soul-validate and /soul-enhance before enabling.
# Validate project soul
/soul-validate
# Validate specific file
/soul-validate .aiwg/SOUL.md
# Validate agent soul
/soul-validate .claude/agents/test-engineer.soul.md