원클릭으로
kn-commit
Use when committing code changes with proper conventional commit format and verification
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use when committing code changes with proper conventional commit format and verification
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | kn-commit |
| description | Use when committing code changes with proper conventional commit format and verification |
Announce: "Using kn-commit to commit changes."
Core principle: VERIFY BEFORE COMMITTING - check staged changes, ask for confirmation.
git status
git diff --staged
Format:
<type>(<scope>): <message>
- Bullet point summarizing change
Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, chore
Rules:
Ready to commit:
feat(auth): add JWT token refresh
- Added refresh token endpoint
Proceed? (yes/no/edit)
Wait for user approval.
git commit -m "feat(auth): add JWT token refresh
- Added refresh token endpoint"
All built-in skills in scope must end with the same user-facing information order: kn-init, kn-spec, kn-flow, kn-plan, kn-research, kn-implement, kn-verify, kn-doc, kn-template, kn-extract, and kn-commit.
Required order for the final user-facing response:
Keep this concise for CLI use. Skill-specific content may extend the key-details section, but must not replace or reorder the shared structure.
Out of scope: explaining, syncing, or generating .claude/skills/*. Runtime auto-sync already handles platform copies, so this skill source only defines the built-in output contract.
For kn-commit, the key details should cover:
When a follow-up is natural, recommend exactly one next command:
/kn-verify/kn-extract or the next task-specific workflow command if one is obviousUse when orchestrating a full Knowns spec or task wave through planning, implementation, review, integration, and verification, optionally using sub-agents when scopes are parallel-safe.
Use when you need to understand existing code, find patterns, search project knowledge, use web research for external/current facts, or explore a large codebase before implementation
Use when working with Knowns documentation - viewing, searching, creating, or updating docs
Use when extracting reusable patterns, decisions, failures, or knowledge into documentation
Use only when the user explicitly wants the legacy no-review-gates pipeline for an approved spec; prefer kn-flow for normal spec orchestration
Use when implementing a task - follow the plan, check ACs, track progress