Skip to main content

code-review

Perform comprehensive code reviews focusing on best practices, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and maintainability

소스 정보

저장소
kyegomez/swarms
최근 소스 활동
2026년 7월 7일 21:16
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
7,324
포크
1,056

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
code-review
description
Perform comprehensive code reviews focusing on best practices, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and maintainability
# Code Review Skill When reviewing code, follow this systematic approach to ensure thorough evaluation: ## Review Checklist ### 1. Code Quality - **Readability**: Is the code easy to understand? - **Naming**: Are variables, functions, and classes well-named? - **Structure**: Is the code properly organized and modular? - **Comments**: Are complex sections adequately documented? - **Complexity**: Are there overly complex functions that should be simplified? ### 2. Security Analysis Check for common vulnerabilities: - SQL injection vulnerabilities - XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) vulnerabilities - Authentication and authorization flaws - Insecure data handling (passwords, sensitive data) - Input validation and sanitization - OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities ### 3. Performance Considerations - Identify potential bottlenecks - Check for inefficient algorithms or data structures - Look for unnecessary database queries or API calls - Evaluate caching opportunities - Assess memory usage patterns ### 4. Best Practices - **DRY Principle**: Eliminate code duplication - **SOLID Principles**: Verify adherence to design principles - **Error Handling**: Check for proper exception handling - **Testing**: Evaluate test coverage and quality - **Dependencies**: Review external dependencies and their versions ### 5. Maintainability - Is the code easy to modify and extend? - Are there proper abstractions? - Is the architecture scalable? - Are there technical debt concerns? ## Review Format Structure your review as follows: 1. **Summary**: High-level overview of the changes 2. **Critical Issues**: Security vulnerabilities or bugs that must be fixed 3. **Major Concerns**: Significant issues affecting quality or performance 4. **Suggestions**: Optional improvements and best practices 5. **Positive Feedback**: Acknowledge good practices and improvements ## Guidelines - Be constructive and respectful - Provide specific examples and suggestions - Explain the "why" behind recommendations - Prioritize issues by severity (critical, major, minor) - Reference documentation or standards when applicable - Consider the context and constraints of the project ## Example Reviews **Security Issue:** ``` CRITICAL: SQL injection vulnerability detected at line 45 Current: f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}" Recommendation: Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection ``` **Performance Suggestion:** ``` SUGGESTION: Consider caching database results at line 123 The same query is executed multiple times in the loop. Cache the results to improve performance by ~80%. ```
GitHub에서 보기