소스 정보
- 저장소
- KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 5월 28일 04:35
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 0
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config --skill ortools명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | ortools |
| description | Google OR-Tools optimization: VRP, scheduling, CP-SAT, MIP, LP, flows, allocation. |
| version | 9.8 |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
OR-Tools provides specialized solvers for hard combinatorial problems. Its crown jewel is the CP-SAT solver, which uses Constraint Programming and Satisfiability techniques to find optimal solutions for scheduling and resource allocation problems that are impossible for standard linear solvers.
Official docs: https://developers.google.com/optimization
GitHub: https://github.com/google/or-tools
Search patterns: cp_model.CpModel, pywraplp.Solver, routing_enums_pb2, AddConstraint
OR-Tools separates the Definition of the problem (Variables, Constraints, Objective) from the Solver engine. You build a model, then pass it to a solver instance.
The most modern and recommended solver for discrete problems. Critical Note: CP-SAT works with integers only. If you have floating-point numbers (like 0.5), you must scale them (e.g., multiply by 100 and work with integers).
After solving, always check the status. It can be OPTIMAL, FEASIBLE (a solution found, but maybe not the best), INFEASIBLE (impossible to solve), or LIMIT_REACHED.
pip install ortools
from ortools.sat.python import cp_model
from ortools.linear_solver import pywraplp
from ortools.constraint_solver import routing_enums_pb2
from ortools.constraint_solver import pywrapcp
from ortools.sat.python import cp_model
# 1. Create the model
model = cp_model.CpModel()
# 2. Define variables: NewIntVar(lower_bound, upper_bound, name)
x = model.NewIntVar(0, 10, 'x')
y = model.NewIntVar(0, 10, 'y')
# 3. Add constraints
model.Add(x + y <= 8)
model.Add(x > 2)
# 4. Define Objective
model.Maximize(x + 2 * y)
# 5. Solve
solver = cp_model.CpSolver()
status = solver.Solve(model)
if status == cp_model.OPTIMAL:
print(f'x = {solver.Value(x)}, y = {solver.Value(y)}')
1.25 to 125 and adjust the logic.INFEASIBLE.model.AddElement.solver.parameters.max_time_in_seconds = 60.0 to get the best possible solution within a minute.solver.Value(var), not the variable object itself.if x > 5: model.Add(...). Use boolean implications (OnlyEnforceIf).x * y (where both are variables) or sin(x). For x * y, you need specialized linearization or piecewise approximations.from ortools.sat.python import cp_model
# ❌ BAD: Using standard Python logic inside the model
# if solver.Value(x) > 5: # ❌ Value() is not available during modeling!
# model.Add(y == 1)
# ✅ GOOD: Conditional constraints (Logical Implication)
b = model.NewBoolVar('b')
model.Add(x > 5).OnlyEnforceIf(b)
model.Add(x <= 5).OnlyEnforceIf(b.Not())
model.Add(y == 1).OnlyEnforceIf(b)
# ❌ BAD: Floating point variables in CP-SAT
# x = model.NewIntVar(0, 1.5, 'x') # ❌ Error!
# ✅ GOOD: Scaling
# x_scaled = model.NewIntVar(0, 150, 'x_scaled') # 150 represents 1.50
from ortools.linear_solver import pywraplp
# Create solver with GLOP backend (Google Linear Optimization Package)
solver = pywraplp.Solver.CreateSolver('GLOP')
# Define continuous variables
x = solver.NumVar(0, solver.infinity(), 'x')
y = solver.NumVar(0, solver.infinity(), 'y')
# Constraint: x + 2y <= 14
ct = solver.Constraint(-solver.infinity(), 14)
ct.SetCoefficient(x, 1)
ct.SetCoefficient(y, 2)
# Objective: Maximize 3x + 4y
objective = solver.Objective()
objective.SetCoefficient(x, 3)
objective.SetCoefficient(y, 4)
objective.SetMaximization()
solver.Solve()
print(f'Solution: x={x.solution_value()}, y={y.solution_value()}')
from ortools.constraint_solver import routing_enums_pb2
from ortools.constraint_solver import pywrapcp
def solve_vrp():
# 1. Distance Matrix (distance between locations)
data = {'distance_matrix': [[0, 10, 20], [10, 0, 15], [20, 15, 0]],
'num_vehicles': 1, 'depot': 0}
# 2. Setup Index Manager and Routing Model
manager = pywrapcp.RoutingIndexManager(len(data['distance_matrix']),
data['num_vehicles'], data['depot'])
routing = pywrapcp.RoutingModel(manager)
# 3. Create Distance Callback
def distance_callback(from_index, to_index):
return data['distance_matrix'][manager.IndexToNode(from_index)][manager.IndexToNode(to_index)]
transit_callback_index = routing.RegisterTransitCallback(distance_callback)
routing.SetArcCostEvaluatorOfAllVehicles(transit_callback_index)
# 4. Solve
search_parameters = pywrapcp.DefaultRoutingSearchParameters()
search_parameters.first_solution_strategy = (
routing_enums_pb2.FirstSolutionStrategy.PATH_CHEAPEST_ARC)
solution = routing.SolveWithParameters(search_parameters)
return solution
model = cp_model.CpModel()
# Define an Interval Variable (Start, Duration, End)
duration = 10
start_var = model.NewIntVar(0, 100, 'start')
end_var = model.NewIntVar(0, 100, 'end')
interval_var = model.NewIntervalVar(start_var, duration, end_var, 'interval')
# No-overlap constraint (Machines can only do one task at a time)
model.AddNoOverlap([interval_var1, interval_var2, interval_var3])
def solve_shifts(num_employees, num_days, shifts_per_day):
model = cp_model.CpModel()
shifts = {}
for e in range(num_employees):
for d in range(num_days):
for s in range(shifts_per_day):
shifts[(e, d, s)] = model.NewBoolVar(f'shift_e{e}d{d}s{s}')
# Constraint: Each shift is assigned to exactly one employee
for d in range(num_days):
for s in range(shifts_per_day):
model.Add(sum(shifts[(e, d, s)] for e in range(num_employees)) == 1)
# Constraint: Each employee works at most one shift per day
for e in range(num_employees):
for d in range(num_days):
model.Add(sum(shifts[(e, d, s)] for s in range(shifts_per_day)) <= 1)
solver = cp_model.CpSolver()
status = solver.Solve(model)
return shifts, solver
def bin_packing(items, bin_capacities):
model = cp_model.CpModel()
# x[i, j] = 1 if item i is in bin j
x = {}
for i in range(len(items)):
for j in range(len(bin_capacities)):
x[i, j] = model.NewBoolVar(f'x_{i}_{j}')
# Each item in exactly one bin
for i in range(len(items)):
model.Add(sum(x[i, j] for j in range(len(bin_capacities))) == 1)
# Bin capacity constraint
for j in range(len(bin_capacities)):
model.Add(sum(x[i, j] * items[i] for i in range(len(items))) <= bin_capacities[j])
If you have a good initial guess, provide it to the solver to speed up search.
model.AddHint(x, 5)
model.AddHint(y, 2)
CP-SAT can use multiple threads to explore different parts of the search tree.
solver = cp_model.CpSolver()
solver.parameters.num_search_workers = 8 # Use 8 CPU cores
As mentioned, OR-Tools CP-SAT is strictly integer.
# ❌ Problem: model.Add(x * 0.1 <= 5)
# ✅ Solution:
model.Add(x <= 50) # Multiply both sides by 10
If solver.Solve(model) returns INFEASIBLE, it means your constraints are contradictory.
# ✅ Solution: Use 'Sufficient Assmptions' or 'Constraint Relaxation'
# to identify which constraint is causing the conflict.
If items A and B are identical, the solver will waste time checking both "A in Bin 1, B in Bin 2" and "B in Bin 1, A in Bin 2".
# ✅ Solution: Add symmetry-breaking constraints
# model.Add(x_A <= x_B) # Force an ordering
Google OR-Tools is the heavy machinery of the optimization world. It solves the discrete puzzles that power global logistics, airline scheduling, and manufacturing, turning impossible "Trial and Error" into mathematical certainty.