소스 정보
- 저장소
- lefant/agent-skills
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 2월 4일 10:28
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 1
- 포크
- 1
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/lefant/agent-skills --skill test-analyzer명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | test-analyzer |
| description | Analyze test failures from CTRF reports using jq for deterministic parsing |
| invocationPattern | when user asks to analyze test failures, investigate failing tests, or understand test patterns |
Analyze CTRF test reports to identify failure patterns, suggest fixes, and provide insights into test health. Uses deterministic jq parsing for efficient, token-friendly analysis.
Call this skill when:
Using ctrf-utils.sh:
ctrf-utils.sh summary <file> # Show pass/fail summary
ctrf-utils.sh failures <file...> # List failed test names
ctrf-utils.sh failures-detail <file> # Show failures with error messages
ctrf-utils.sh flaky <file> # Show tests with retry attempts
ctrf-utils.sh slowest <N> <file> # Show N slowest tests
Direct jq commands:
jq '.results.summary' report.ctrf.json
jq -r '.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed") | .name' report.ctrf.json
CTRF reports have this structure:
{
"results": {
"tool": { "name": "vitest" },
"summary": { "tests": 50, "passed": 48, "failed": 2, "skipped": 0 },
"tests": [
{
"name": "should validate user input",
"status": "failed",
"duration": 156,
"suite": "UserForm",
"message": "Expected true, received false",
"filePath":
Required fields per test: name, status, duration
Full schema: ctrf-schema.json
jq '.results.summary' /workspace/artifacts/test/vitest.ctrf.json
jq -r '.results.summary | "Tests: \(.tests) | Passed: \(.passed) | Failed: \(.failed)"' /workspace/artifacts/test/vitest.ctrf.json
jq -r '.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed") | .name' /workspace/artifacts/test/*.ctrf.json
jq -r '.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed") | "❌ \(.name): \(.message // "No message")"' /workspace/artifacts/test/*.ctrf.json
jq '[.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed")] | group_by(.message) | map({error: .[0].message, count: length, tests: map(.name)}) | sort_by(.count) | reverse' /workspace/artifacts/test/*.ctrf.json
jq '.results.tests | sort_by(.duration) | reverse | limit(10; .[]) | {name, duration}' /workspace/artifacts/test/vitest.ctrf.json
jq -r '.results.tests[] | select(.retries > 0 or .flaky == true) | "⚠️ \(.name) (retries: \(.retries // 0))"' /workspace/artifacts/test/*.ctrf.json
jq -r '[.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed") | .filePath] | unique | .[]' /workspace/artifacts/test/vitest.ctrf.json
jq -s '{vitest: .[0].results.summary.failed, pytest: .[1].results.summary.failed, total: ((.[0].results.summary.failed // 0) + (.[1].results.summary.failed // 0))}' /workspace/artifacts/test/vitest.ctrf.json /workspace/artifacts/test/pytest.ctrf.json
jq -c '{summary: .results.summary, failures: [.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed") | {name, suite, message, file: "\(.filePath):\(.line)"}]}' /workspace/artifacts/test/*.ctrf.json
For comprehensive examples (24+), see: jq-examples-comprehensive.md
Implementation scripts:
Context and research behind this approach:
When invoked:
Locate CTRF reports (common locations: artifacts/test/, test-results/, project root)
Get summary:
jq -r '.results.summary | "Tests: \(.tests) | Passed: \(.passed) | Failed: \(.failed)"' *.ctrf.json
If failures exist, list them:
jq -r '.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed") | "❌ \(.name): \(.message // "No message")"' *.ctrf.json
Analyze patterns (group similar errors):
jq '[.results.tests[] | select(.status == "failed")] | group_by(.message) | map({error: .[0].message, count: length})' *.ctrf.json
Read source files for failed tests (extract file paths with jq, then read)
Suggest fixes based on patterns (group similar errors, identify root causes)
Rewrite prose (docs, READMEs, PR descriptions, error messages, release notes, comments, tool descriptions, system prompts — never code) into ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English to remove "AI slop". Use when asked to make writing not sound like AI, make docs clear or plain, enforce a controlled writing style, review text for STE violations, or write technical documentation that reads human. Two modes — strict (procedures/safety) and STE-flavored (general prose).
Access GitHub repositories programmatically using the exe.dev GitHub integration, gh CLI, or REST API. Use when interacting with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, workflows, discussions, or actions. On exe.dev VMs, prefer the tokenless GitHub integration before falling back to local gh authentication or GH_TOKEN.
Use when browser automation needs a human checkpoint: the user wants to demonstrate a workflow once, watch and verify an agent-driven browser result before proceeding, log in or complete MFA/credential-sensitive steps manually, connect through VNC, or use agent-browser with human-in-the-loop browser control. This skill sets up and operates the bundled Browser Debug Hub runtime with safe loopback VNC/CDP defaults.
SOC 직업 분류 기준