| name | security-hub |
| description | [WHAT] Unified security skill router — routes to the right security sub-skill based on intent
[HOW] Decision tree routes to: security-review (code audit), security-best-practices (language-specific), security-threat-model (threat modeling), security-ownership-map (ownership topology)
[WHEN] Use when user mentions security, audit, vulnerability, threat model, OWASP, pentest, code review security, ownership analysis
[WHY] Prevents loading 4 separate security skills; routes to the right one based on context
Triggers: "security", "audit", "vulnerability", "threat model", "OWASP", "pentest", "code review security", "ownership", "bus factor", "security review"
|
| skill_type | router |
| category | security |
| subsumes | ["security-review","security-best-practices","security-threat-model","security-ownership-map"] |
Security Hub — Unified Security Router
Routes security requests to the appropriate specialized sub-skill. Use this router instead of loading individual security skills directly.
Decision Tree
Step 1: Identify Intent
| User Intent | Sub-Skill | Load When |
|---|
| Code audit, checklist review, pre-deployment checks | security-review | User asks to "review security", "check for vulnerabilities", "audit this code" |
| Language-specific best practices (Python/JS/Go) | security-best-practices | User asks for "secure coding in [language]", "framework security", "language-specific security" |
| Threat modeling, trust boundaries, abuse paths | security-threat-model | User asks to "threat model", "enumerate threats", "attacker paths", "AppSec analysis" |
| Ownership risk, bus factor, maintainer topology | security-ownership-map | User asks for "ownership analysis", "bus factor", "who owns sensitive code", "orphaned code" |
Step 2: Clarify Ambiguity
- If intent is unclear, ask: "What type of security work? (1) Code review (2) Language best practices (3) Threat model (4) Ownership analysis"
- If scope is unclear (e.g., "security audit"), default to
security-review (broadest checklist)
Sub-Skill Quick Reference
security-review (Code Audit Checklist)
Pre-deployment security checklist covering: secrets management, input validation, SQL injection, auth/authz, XSS/CSRF, rate limiting, dependency security. Best for: code review, pre-deploy gates, general vulnerability scanning.
security-best-practices (Language/Framework Security)
Language and framework-specific security guidance (Python, JS/TS, Go). Loads reference docs for secure-by-default coding, passive vulnerability detection, and security report generation. Best for: new projects, framework-specific security, secure coding patterns.
security-threat-model (AppSec Threat Modeling)
Repository-grounded threat modeling: trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations. Produces Markdown threat model documents. Best for: architecture review, AppSec planning, risk prioritization.
security-ownership-map (Ownership Topology)
Git-based ownership analysis: compute bus factor, identify orphaned sensitive code, map maintainer topology, export graph data (CSV/JSON/GraphML). Best for: security maintainer analysis, CODEOWNERS drift, ownership risk.
Cross-Cutting Workflows
Use multiple sub-skills together for comprehensive security analysis:
-
New Project Security
- Start:
security-best-practices (secure-by-default patterns)
- Then:
security-review (pre-deploy checklist)
-
AppSec Deep Dive
- Start:
security-threat-model (enumerate threats)
- Then:
security-review (validate controls)
- Then:
security-ownership-map (identify maintainers for high-risk code)
-
Incident Response / Post-Mortem
- Start:
security-ownership-map (who owns the vulnerable code?)
- Then:
security-threat-model (how was this exploitable?)
- Then:
security-best-practices (what secure pattern prevents this?)
-
CODEOWNERS Validation
- Start:
security-ownership-map (compute actual ownership)
- Then:
security-threat-model (identify sensitive boundaries)
- Compare: ownership map vs CODEOWNERS file
Notes
- Progressive disclosure: Load only the sub-skill you need. The router stays small; sub-skills contain the full content.
- No overlap: Each sub-skill has a distinct scope. No redundant checklists across skills.
- Composable: Chain sub-skills together for end-to-end security workflows.
