Skip to main content

principle-prove-it-works

Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

소스 정보

저장소
michael-denyer/pstack-claude
최근 소스 활동
2026년 10월 16일 15:41
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
3,431
포크
320

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
principle-prove-it-works
description
Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'
user-invocable
false
# Prove It Works Verify every task output by checking the real thing directly. Do not infer from proxies, self-reports, or "it compiles." **Why:** Unverified work has unknown correctness. Indirect verification (file mtimes, output freshness, agent self-reports, cached screenshots) feels cheaper than direct observation. Acting on a wrong inference costs far more than checking the source. Check the real thing, not a proxy: - Check process liveness directly, not indirectly through derived state - Read the actual value, not a cached or derived representation - When verification fails, suspect the observation method before suspecting the system - Before you report success (merged, sent, started), read the real state and the exit code. Truncated output (`| tail -1`) and your own echo prove nothing Verify the process as well as the outcome. A correct result can rest on a broken process, and a review that checks results passes it: a clause reconstructed from the user's paste instead of the durable record, a constraint honored by chance from a file never read. For each fact you relied on, name the record it came from and confirm that record is the one the project's rules point at. Red is a colour, not a measurement. A failing check proves the instrument only when the failure content is the disagreement you predicted. An exception, an empty collection against a non-empty literal, and a real mismatch all print red, so quote the assertion's diff (`Extra items in the right set`), never the assertion (`assert {...} == {...}`). A convergence probe keys on behavior only the new artifact can produce, never an identity field the old one also emits. A same-SHA restart lets old code report the new commit SHA. ## Script the check when you can The strongest proof is a deterministic script that re-runs the same comparison, not a one-time eyeball. Write the script, run it, and keep its output as an artifact a reviewer can re-run instead of trusting your word. Keep the artifact visible for the human. Commit it only for large or complex work where the trail has to be auditable later, like a big port or migration (the **show-me-your-work** skill).
GitHub에서 보기