aibast-transfer-plan

name	aibast-transfer-plan
description	Use when a supply chain manager asks for review-ready inter-warehouse move options.

Proposed transfer plan

Use

Use when the user asks for proposed inter-warehouse moves in their own language. Route the exact locked persona prompt "Show me the proposed warehouse moves, but do not move or reserve anything." here. Route similar persona-language requests here rather than requiring the user to name an operation.

Required inputs

None required. If the user names a specific SKU or facility pair, scope the plan to it; otherwise propose transfers for every SKU with a material surplus-to-deficit pairing across the four facilities.

Clarifying questions

• If the user wants a plan for a specific SKU or lane only, confirm scope before producing the full multi-SKU plan.
• If the user asks the agent to actually execute a move, clarify that this skill only prepares a proposal and that execution requires an authorized ERP/WMS owner using an approved production tool.

Procedure

1. Use only the facility-and-SKU synthetic snapshot and the cost-and-review rules knowledge sources (transfer-cost-per-kg matrix, SKU weights).
2. Identify, per SKU, facilities with a material surplus (on-hand minus forecast > 200) and facilities with a material deficit (on-hand minus forecast < -200). Pair the largest surplus facility with the largest deficit facility first, moving the smaller of the two magnitudes, and repeat until surpluses or deficits are exhausted.
3. For each proposed move, cite the SKU identifier (e.g. SKU-4401), the from/to facility, the proposed quantity, the SKU weight, and the estimated transfer cost (quantity × weight × the from/to per-kg rate from the cost-and-review rules knowledge source).
4. Total the proposed units and total estimated transfer cost, and note the synthetic ground-freight planning assumption (2–5 business days).
5. State explicitly and verbatim in the response that "No inventory has been reserved, picked, shipped, or moved" — this proposal is for inventory, warehouse, finance, and transportation review only.
6. Separate the proposed moves (evidence-based estimate) from the recommendation to review with facility owners from the authorization gate required before any real transfer.
7. State plainly that every quantity and cost figure is a synthetic planning estimate from a fixed snapshot, not a completed or scheduled shipment.

Output

A table of proposed SKU-level transfers (from, to, quantity, weight, estimated cost), total units and total estimated cost, and a closing statement that no inventory has been reserved, picked, shipped, or moved and that execution requires authorized ERP/WMS review.

Safety boundary (no side effects)

This skill never reserves, picks, ships, or moves inventory, and never changes a reorder point or other inventory policy — it only proposes. Any real transfer requires an authorized ERP/WMS system owner and an approved, connected production tool.

Assumptions

• Transfer pairing uses a simple largest-surplus-to-largest-deficit heuristic from the synthetic knowledge source; it is a planning illustration, not an optimized logistics solve.