| name | pitch-deck-creator |
| description | Sunum şablonu oluşturma. Slide yapısı, story flow, data visualization ve deck metrics. |
| triggers | {"keywords":["pitch deck","sunum şablonu","investor pitch","startup pitch","sales deck","presentation builder"]} |
| auto_load_when | Kullanıcı pitch deck, yatırımcı sunumu, satış prezentasyonu veya slide yapısı talep ettiğinde |
| agent | researcher |
| tools | ["Read","Write","Grep","Glob"] |
Pitch Deck Creator (Sunum Uzmanı)
Odak Alanı: Yatırımcı ve satış pitchleri için etkili slide yapıları, hikaye akışı ve veri görselleştirme stratejileri tasarlamak.
Pattern 1: Slide Yapısı Mimarisi
1.1 Startup Pitch Deck (Investor)
Standard 10-Slide Framework (Sequoia Style)
├── Slide 1: Problem
│ ├── Mevcut pain point'i tanımla
│ ├── Target customer segment
│ └── Problem severity (quantify)
├── Slide 2: Solution
│ ├── Ürün/Service tanımı
│ ├── Key value proposition
│ └── How it works (1-liner)
├── Slide 3: Why Now
│ ├── Market timing
│ ├── Technology shift
│ └── Regulatory change (varsa)
├── Slide 4: Market Size
│ ├── TAM (Total Addressable Market)
│ ├── SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market)
│ └── SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)
├── Slide 5: Business Model
│ ├── Revenue model
│ ├── Pricing tiers
│ └── Unit economics
├── Slide 6: Go-to-Market
│ ├── Customer acquisition channels
│ ├── Sales cycle
│ └── Expansion strategy
├── Slide 7: Competition
│ ├── Competitive landscape
│ ├── Key differentiators
│ └── Barriers to entry
├── Slide 8: Team
│ ├── Founders background
│ ├── Key hires (CTO, Sales, etc)
│ └── Advisory board
├── Slide 9: Financials
│ ├── Traction metrics
│ ├── Projections (3-5 years)
│ └── Key assumptions
└── Slide 10: Ask
├── Funding amount
├── Use of funds
└── Expected runway
1.2 Sales Deck Yapısı
B2B Sales Deck (15-20 slides)
├── Section A: Introduction (3 slides)
│ ├── Company overview
│ ├── Why we exist
│ └── Value proposition summary
├── Section B: Problem Discovery (3 slides)
│ ├── Industry challenges
│ ├── Customer pain points
│ └── Cost of inaction
├── Section C: Solution (5 slides)
│ ├── Platform/Product overview
│ ├── Key features
│ ├── How it works
│ ├── Differentiators
│ └── Integration/security
├── Section D: Social Proof (3 slides)
│ ├── Case studies (1-2)
│ ├── Customer logos
│ └── Industry recognition
├── Section E: Proposal (3 slides)
│ ├── Investment options
│ ├── Timeline
│ └── Next steps
└── Section F: Appendix (as needed)
├── Technical specs
├── Team bios
└── Detailed financials
Pattern 2: Story Flow Mimarisi
2.1 The Pitch Narrative Arc
Story Structure (3-Act Model)
├── Act 1: The Hook (Slides 1-3)
│ ├── Problem presentation
│ ├── Emotional connection
│ └── Why now urgency
├── Act 2: The Journey (Slides 4-8)
│ ├── Solution reveal
│ ├── Market validation
│ ├── Business model
│ └── Traction proof
└── Act 3: The Call (Slides 9-10)
├── Team credibility
├── Financial ask
└── Vision clarity
2.2 Story Flow Tree
Narrative Decision Tree
├── Opening Frame
│ ├── Problem-first → Emotional hook
│ └── Solution-first → Rational hook
├── Problem Framing
│ ├── Quantified pain → Data-backed
│ └── Anecdotal → Personal story
├── Solution Reveal
│ ├── Demo-based → Visual
│ └── Feature-focused → Technical
├── Validation
│ ├── Metrics-driven → Traction
│ └── Social proof → Authority
└── Closing
├── Ask-driven → Direct
└── Vision-driven → Inspirational
Pattern 3: Data Visualization Strategy
3.1 Chart Türleri ve Kullanım
Quantitative Data
├── Market Size → Donut chart (TAM/SAM/SOM)
├── Growth trajectory → Line chart (12-month)
├── Revenue model → Stacked bar (tiers)
├── Competitive position → Quadrant chart
├── Customer segments → Horizontal bar
└── Financial projections → Area chart
Qualitative Data
├── Problem severity → Icon scale
├── Feature comparison → Checkbox matrix
├── Timeline → Gantt chart
└── Team composition → Org chart
3.2 Data Viz Best Practices
Design Rules:
├── Max 5 data points per chart
├── Use consistent color palette (max 5 colors)
├── Label axes clearly
├── Include data source (bottom right)
├── Add "So what?" insight annotation
└── Use real numbers (no fake precision)
Wrong:
├── ❌ 3D charts
├── ❌ Pie charts with >5 slices
├── ❌ Cluttered axes
├── ❌ No legend
└── ❌ Decorative elements
Right:
├── ✓ Clean axis labels
├── ✓ Direct labeling or legend
├── ✓ Highlight key data point
├── ✓ Consistent spacing
└── ✓ White space balance
Pattern 4: Deck Metrics Optimization
4.1 Slide-Level Metrics
Per Slide Performance Targets:
├── Load time: <1.5 seconds
├── Text density: <30 words
├── Visual elements: 1-2 key images
├── Data points: max 5
├── Reading time: <10 seconds
└── Key message: 1 takeaway
4.2 Deck-Level Metrics
File Specifications:
├── Total slides: 10-20 (investor), 15-25 (sales)
├── File size: <10MB (optimized images)
├── Total words: 500-800
├── Animation: minimal, purposeful
├── Fonts: 2 max (body + accent)
└── Aspect ratio: 16:9 (standard) or 4:3 (legacy)
Pattern 5: Slide-by-Slide Framework
5.1 Title Slide
Elements:
├── Company logo (top left or center)
├── Tagline (one-liner value prop)
├── Presenter name + title
├── Date
└── Confidentiality notice (optional)
Design:
├── Clean background (solid or subtle gradient)
├── Logo contrast: ensure visibility
└── Typography: large, bold tagline
5.2 Problem Slide
Template Structure:
├── Headline: "[Industry] challenge"
├── Body text: 3-4 bullet points
├── Supporting visual: Icon or simple illustration
├── Data point: Quantified pain
└── Quote (optional): Industry expert or customer
Hook Techniques:
├── Start with a question
├── Use a provocative statistic
├── Show a real customer quote
└── Create urgency with market data
5.3 Solution Slide
Template Structure:
├── Product visual (screenshot or mockup)
├── Value proposition (headline)
├── Key benefits (3-4 bullets)
├── How it works (1-2 sentences)
└── Differentiation statement
Best Practices:
├── Show, don't tell
├── Use simple, clear visuals
├── Focus on outcomes, not features
└── Connect to problem solution directly
Key Patterns (Özet)
| Pattern | Odak | Uygulama |
|---|
| Slide Structure | Information architecture | 10-slide investor, 15-25 sales |
| Story Flow | Narrative arc | 3-act model (Hook-Journey-Call) |
| Data Viz | Visual clarity | Max 5 data points per chart |
| Metrics | Deck performance | <10MB, <800 words, <20 slides |
| Design | Visual hierarchy | 1 key message per slide |
Anti-Patterns
❌ Yasaklı Yaklaşımlar
Content errors:
- Too much text (wall of text)
- Missing key sections
- Outdated data
- Unclear value proposition
Design errors:
- Inconsistent fonts/colors
- Low-res images
- Cluttered layouts
- Too many animations
Story errors:
- No clear narrative
- Jumping between topics
- Missing problem-solution link
- Weak closing
✅ Doğru Yaklaşımlar
Content:
- One key message per slide
- Data with clear insights
- Customer evidence
- Clear call-to-action
Design:
- White space utilization
- Consistent visual system
- High-quality graphics
- Readable typography (24pt+)
Story:
- Clear problem-solution fit
- Logical flow
- Compelling close
- Rehearsed delivery
Quick Reference
| Slide | İçerik | Metrik |
|---|
| Problem | Pain point + size | 30 words max |
| Solution | Product + value | 1 clear image |
| Market | TAM/SAM/SOM | Visual hierarchy |
| Model | Revenue + pricing | Unit economics |
| Team | Credentials + gaps | Relevant only |
| Ask | Amount + use | Specific numbers |
| Element | Standard | Rule |
|---|
| Slides | 10-25 | 1 takeaway each |
| Words/slide | 25-40 | Split if >50 |
| Images | 1-2 per slide | High quality |
| Colors | 3-5 palette | Consistent |
| Fonts | 2 max | Readable 24pt+ |
| Timing | Purpose | Duration |
|---|
| Total pitch | Investor meeting | 10-15 min |
| Presentation | Actual speak | 7-10 min |
| Q&A | Discussion | 10-20 min |
| Per slide | Average | 30-45 sec |
🌍 Universal Language Support
- Turkish Native: This skill natively supports Turkish. If the user prompt is in Turkish, all analysis, formatting, and output MUST be entirely in Turkish. You do not need explicit "write in Turkish" instructions.