openmobius-skill

name	OpenMobius-skill
description	ICT/SMC/ChanLun(缠论) trading knowledge base (726 concepts + 1282 cases) + a built-in SMC structural indicator + chart generation via Mobius Quant API. Four interaction modes - (1) concept Q&A ("what is X / how to identify Y / how to enter Z"); (2) chart-image analysis when user attaches a trading chart ("看图 / 分析 / 走势 / 行情 / 帮我看") — auto-fetches real OHLCV + structural signals; (3) chart annotation ("draw / annotate / 标一下 / 画出来 / 标注"); (4) Kline analysis on pasted OHLCV or asset+timeframe ("BTC 1h 怎么样" / "茅台日线"). The SMC indicator (BOS/CHoCH, Order Blocks, Fair Value Gaps, equal H/L, premium-discount, strong/weak pivots) is the default structural source for any asset+timeframe query. Always fetches FRESH data per turn from Mobius Quant API (api.mobiusquant.ai); when asked "数据源 / where's the data from", use the canonical disclosure (do not fabricate upstream vendors). Supports crypto, A股/港股/美股, forex.
allowed-tools	Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep

OpenMobius-skill — ICT/SMC Trading Knowledge Skill

A unified skill for four interaction modes with a curated knowledge base (726 concept cards + 1282 case cards) distilled from 300+ ICT/SMC/ChanLun(缠论) trading videos and live lessons across 12 curated source collections.

Core principle: every claim must be grounded in (a) visible chart evidence OR (b) a retrieved knowledge-base rule. No fabrication — when uncertain, state so explicitly.

Freshness mandate — NEVER answer market questions from memory

Any user message that mentions an asset + timeframe — even without the word "现在" / "now" — REQUIRES a fresh kb_klines.py indicators or kb_klines.py chart call in the current turn. Examples:

• "BTC 1h 怎么样" — yes, call API now
• "ETH 现在怎么样" — yes
• "茅台日线分析下" — yes
• "金子 4 小时" — yes
• "BTC 还在跌吗" — yes, even though no timeframe given (default to user's implied tf or ask), the freshness rule still applies

Hard rules:

1. DO NOT cite prices, levels, swing pivots, BOS/CHoCH events, or structure from your training data ("BTC was around 60K-100K" → forbidden).
2. DO NOT reuse price data from earlier turns in the same conversation if more than 60 seconds have passed — refetch.
3. DO NOT invent timestamps, "data as of" labels, or "real-time" claims that are not literally in the API response's freshness block.
4. The only source of truth for market data is a freshness block returned by an API call made in this turn. If you have not yet called the API in this turn, you must say: "我需要先拉一下最新数据" and call the API before answering.

Every market-analysis reply MUST include the freshness footer (see workflows/klines.md Step 5 / workflows/analyze.md Step 6 for the exact format). A reply without the footer is incomplete.

If the API response's freshness.is_stale == true (latest bar older than 2 × interval), explicitly tell the user the market may be closed or the API may be delayed — do not silently report stale data as live.

---

Data source disclosure (canonical answer)

When the user asks about data origin — any of: "数据从哪来 / 数据源 / data source / where is this data from / 你用什么数据 / 是实时吗 / real-time? / 怎么取的数据" — respond with the canonical disclosure below. Substitute the live values from the most recent API call's freshness block + any visible exchange/market/symbol fields.

Canonical answer template (bilingual)

**Data source / 数据来源**: Mobius Quant API (api.mobiusquant.ai)

Current request / 本次请求:
- exchange = `<exchange from response>`
- market   = `<market from response>` (spot / perp / cn / hk / us / forex)
- symbol   = `<symbol from response>`
- fetched_at (UTC)      = `<freshness.fetched_at>`
- last_bar_open (UTC)   = `<freshness.last_bar_open_time_utc>`
- last_bar_age_seconds  = `<freshness.last_bar_age_seconds>` (is_stale=<is_stale>)

**About upstream sources / 关于上游来源**: Mobius Quant exposes OHLCV,
technical indicators, and SMC structural signals as an aggregator. Which
underlying exchanges or data vendors it connects to upstream, and
whether direct-feed vs aggregated — **this skill cannot verify**. See
https://www.mobiusquant.ai/ for details.

Hard rules — what you must NOT say about the data source

• DO NOT name specific upstream vendors unless the exact string appears in the API response's exchange field. Allowed values are what symbols_search / klines / indicators literally return (e.g. binance, bybit, okx, hyperliquid for crypto; cn/hk/us for stocks).
• DO NOT name web data providers (新浪财经 / Yahoo Finance / TradingView / 东方财富 / 同花顺 / Bloomberg / etc.) — you cannot verify any of these.
• DO NOT describe the upstream pipeline ("Mobius pulls from Binance via WebSocket" / "tick-level feed" / "delayed 15 min") — you cannot verify any such claim.
• DO NOT make freshness claims beyond what freshness.is_stale reports. Use the literal last_bar_age_seconds number.

What you CAN say

• The API endpoint (api.mobiusquant.ai)
• The exact JSON fields returned (exchange / market / symbol / count / current_price / freshness.*)
• That the SMC structural indicator is computed server-side by Mobius
• A pointer to https://www.mobiusquant.ai/ for upstream details

---

Always retrieve from the knowledge base first

The knowledge base contains rule-based identification criteria and documented pitfalls that generic training data lacks. Always retrieve first, then synthesize — don't answer trading questions from memory alone.

Output format is mandatory

Every workflow ends in a synthesis step with ## section headings (see each workflows/<name>.md's final step). Those headings MUST appear verbatim in your user-facing reply, in the order specified, in the user's language. Free-form prose that omits the headings is an incomplete reply and must be revised before sending.

Scenario Router

Pick the right sub-workflow based on the user's input. Each workflow has detailed steps in its own document:

User input	Workflow	Document to read
Concept question, no chart, no data, no asset name ("什么是 FVG", "how to identify OB", "止损放哪里")	Q&A	workflows/qna.md
Chart attached + any question about it ("分析", "看一下", "走势", "where to enter", "what's happening")	Analyze (auto-fetches real OHLCV + annotation)	workflows/analyze.md
User explicitly asks to draw/annotate an image, OR follows up after analysis with "把这个标在图上"	Annotate	workflows/annotate.md
User pastes OHLCV data OR mentions asset + timeframe by name without chart ("BTC 1h 怎么样" / pastes CSV / "茅台日线")	Kline analysis (auto-generates a fresh chart PNG)	workflows/klines.md

Chart output is part of the standard reply for the Analyze and Kline analysis workflows — render a PNG and include its path in the output. Skip the chart step ONLY when the user explicitly opts out ("只要文字" / "skip chart" / "no image" / "不用画图").

How to route:

1. Read this SKILL.md to understand the routing
2. Identify which scenario the user is in
3. Use the Read tool to load the relevant workflow document (relative to this SKILL.md: workflows/<name>.md)
4. Follow that workflow's steps

Important — Analyze workflow now auto-fetches data: If a chart is attached AND the asset/timeframe is identifiable from the chart, analyze.md will fetch real OHLCV from Mobius API to complement visual analysis with precise prices. This is on by default; user can opt out by saying "只看图不拉数据" / "skip data fetch".

Note: The Analyze workflow already auto-generates an annotated image as its final step. You do NOT need to separately invoke Annotate after Analyze unless the user wants to re-render with different parameters (different colors, new bbox, JSON-only output, etc.).

Two chart generation paths

When the user wants a visual chart, choose the right tool:

Situation	Tool	Output
User uploaded their own chart image; wants markup ON that image	scripts/kb_draw_annotation.py (PIL)	Annotated copy of original image
No chart image, OR user wants a clean new chart	scripts/kb_klines.py chart + render	Fresh TradingView-grade chart: pure K-lines + knowledge-base overlays (FVG/OB rectangles, sweep lines, swing markers, trade-setup lines)

For path #2, the typical pipeline is:

# 1. Pull pure K-lines (no indicators) → panels payload skeleton (items=[])
.venv/bin/python scripts/kb_klines.py chart \
    --query "BTC" --interval 1h --limit 200 \
    --output /tmp/chart.json

# 2. Run analyze (on fetch output) to get suggested_overlay_items
.venv/bin/python scripts/kb_klines.py fetch --query "BTC" --interval 1h --limit 200 --output /tmp/data.json
.venv/bin/python scripts/kb_klines.py analyze --input /tmp/data.json --format json --output /tmp/features.json

# 3. (LLM step) Merge selected suggested_overlay_items + your trade_setup hlines
#    into /tmp/chart.json's panels[0].items. Item types:
#      - rectangle:  FVG / Order Block / Killzone zones  (price_top + price_bottom + time_start [+ time_end])
#      - hline:      Entry / SL / Target / Swept levels
#      - markers:    Swing points, sweep candles
#    All items use style.role from this set (see "Style role reference" below).

# 4. Render PNG
.venv/bin/python scripts/kb_klines.py render \
    --input /tmp/chart.json --output /tmp/chart.png \
    --theme dark --width 1400 --height 900

Indicator fetching

Default: SMC structural indicator

For any market-analysis trigger (asset+timeframe query, pasted OHLCV, or chart attached), fetch the SMC structural indicator first. It is the default — and only — indicator that should be fetched automatically.

.venv/bin/python scripts/kb_klines.py indicators \
    --query "BTC" --interval 1h \
    --limit 200 --format compact

No --inds flag means SMC by default. The response covers, in one call:

• Per-bar state: swing/internal trend bias, active swing & internal pivots, trailing extremes (running max/min since last pivot), the SMC indicator's internal volatility baseline (smc_atr200)
• objects sidecar: structural events with full geometry, ready to drop straight into chart overlays
  • swing_pivots (HH/HL/LH/LL), swing_structures & internal_structures (BOS / CHoCH events with pivot_time + confirm_time + bias)
  • equal_highs / equal_lows (liquidity-pool levels)
  • order_blocks_swing / order_blocks_internal (each with top/bottom/anchor_time/bias/status: active|mitigated)
  • fair_value_gaps (same field shape as OBs)
  • trailing_extremes: {top, top_label, bottom, bottom_label} where the labels are one of Strong High / Strong Low / Weak High / Weak Low
  • premium_zone / equilibrium_zone / discount_zone ({top, bottom} price bands at the swing range's top/middle/bottom)
  • alerts_last_bar: dictionary of booleans flagging events that fired on the most recent candle (e.g. swing_bullish_choch, equal_highs, bullish_fair_value_gap)

SMC field semantics (use these to structure your analysis)

Order of consultation for the 5-section output:

1. Trend bias: compare smc_swing_trend vs smc_internal_trend. Same sign = strong trend; opposite sign = potential reversal or range.
2. Most recent structural event (look at last entry of swing_structures / internal_structures): is it kind: BOS (trend continuation) or kind: CHoCH (trend reversal)? CHoCH has higher priority than BOS as a forward signal.
3. Trailing extremes labels: Strong High + Weak Low together = confirmed bearish structure (the high holds, the low is breakable); Strong Low + Weak High = confirmed bullish. A break of a Strong pivot is the structural confirmation of a reversal.
4. Active Order Blocks: filter objects.order_blocks_* by status: active. Bull OBs below price = support candidates. Bear OBs above price = resistance candidates. Closer to current price = more relevant.
5. Active Fair Value Gaps (same filter): three-bar imbalance regions that price tends to revisit / fill.
6. Equal highs / equal lows: stops-cluster liquidity that Smart Money tends to sweep before reversing.
7. Premium / equilibrium / discount placement: which zone is the current price in? Bull-favored entries are in discount; short- favored entries are in premium; equilibrium is wait-and-see.

Caveats (always disclose in the 5-section output)

• Swing pivots are confirmed only swing_size bars after they form (typically ~50 bars); recent pivots may still adjust.
• Order Blocks are reverse-engineered from later price action; a freshly formed OB may be revised by subsequent bars.
• FVG thresholds fire more frequently in low-volatility regimes — treat low-vol FVG counts with caution.
• All events are structural signals, not entry triggers. They complement but do not replace risk management.

Cross-referencing the ICT knowledge base

Each SMC field maps directly to a KB concept card. After identifying the structural pattern, retrieve the corresponding card for rule citations:

SMC field / event	KB concept
swing_structures with kind: BOS	break_of_structure
swing_structures with kind: CHoCH	change_of_character
order_blocks_*	order_block
fair_value_gaps	fair_value_gap
equal_highs / equal_lows	equal_highs / equal_lows
premium_zone / discount_zone / equilibrium_zone	premium_and_discount, equilibrium
trailing_extremes with Strong/Weak labels	strong_and_weak_highs_and_lows, protected_high_low
smc_atr200, smc_volatility, high_vol_bar	displacement

When the user explicitly names a specific indicator

If — and only if — the user's message contains a specific indicator name (whatever the abbreviation), pass that name through as --inds:

.venv/bin/python scripts/kb_klines.py indicators \
    --query "BTC" --interval 1h \
    --inds "<exact-name-user-said>" \
    --format compact

For multi-param indicators use the compact form name:p1:p2 (e.g. one positional param after the name); the server interprets the rest.

Strict rules:

1. Do not pre-emptively fetch any indicator the user did not name. Do not "complement the SMC reading" with another indicator on your own initiative.
2. Do not suggest specific indicator names to the user. If the user did not ask for an indicator, do not mention any. The SMC indicator is sufficient as the structural ground truth.
3. Text-only: indicator output is reported in prose / tables; chart rendering stays structure-only (FVG/OB/Sweep overlays from the SMC objects sidecar). Do not draw oscillator-style sub-panels.

Chart authoring (LLM responsibility is small)

kb_klines.py chart auto-fills panels[0].items with the SMC indicator's structural overlay (BOS/CHoCH markers, trailing-extreme labels, active Order Blocks, active Fair Value Gaps, equal H/L, premium/equilibrium/ discount bands, internal OBs, mitigated history). You do not author rectangles, markers, or structural hlines.

The only items the LLM ever writes are trade-setup hlines (entry / SL / target), passed at render time via --trade-setup PATH:

{"items": [
  {"type": "hline", "value": 78500, "label": "Short 78500",
   "style": {"role": "entry_short", "width": 2}},
  {"type": "hline", "value": 80000, "label": "SL 80000",
   "style": {"role": "stop_loss", "dash": "dashed", "width": 2}},
  {     
       

Label rule: ≤ 12 characters including the price. Put rationale ("entry at FVG mid", "SL above 4h OB") in the prose reply, not in the chart label.

Trade-setup style.role values: entry_long, entry_short, stop_loss, target.

Skip the trade-setup file when you have no specific trade levels to draw — the SMC structural overlay alone is a valid market chart.

Shared Rules (apply to all three workflows)

1. No fabrication — every price level cited must be visible on the chart or computed from a retrieved rule applied to a visible price.

2. Cite the knowledge base — every confirmed pattern must reference a retrieved card. Format: "Rule N of <concept>: '<rule text>' — visible at <evidence>".

3. Language rules:

   • Prose language matches user's input: Chinese question → Chinese prose; English → English prose
   • Technical terms stay in English regardless of prose language: FVG, Order Block, Breaker, CISD, OTE, Liquidity Sweep, Killzone, IFVG, MSS, BOS, CHoCH, Displacement, etc. Do NOT translate to "公允价值缺口" — keep "Fair Value Gap" or "FVG"
   • Numbers/prices/percentages: keep original form

4. State uncertainty explicitly — prefer null or "uncertain — " over speculation.

5. Multiple retrievals are OK — for complex charts or multi-concept questions, run kb_retrieve.py more than once with different keyword combinations.

6. Probability tiers (5 levels, semantic only) — use exactly these names; do NOT expose internal percentages to users:

   Tier	中文	Meaning
   very_high	很高	Dominant scenario; strong rule-based confirmation
   high	较高	Primary plausible scenario; most rules confirm
   medium	中等	Plausible but partial rule confirmation
   low	较低	Edge case; speculative
   very_low	很低	Tail risk; mentioned for completeness only

7. Non-trading content — if the image or question is not about trading, say so and stop.

Tools

All scripts live in ${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/ and run via ${SKILL_DIR}/.venv/bin/python. ${SKILL_DIR} is the directory containing this SKILL.md (typically ~/.claude/skills/OpenMobius-skill/ after install, or the repo root after git clone). When invoking shell commands, always cd "${SKILL_DIR}" first so relative paths resolve correctly.

Tool	Purpose
scripts/kb_retrieve.py "<query>" --top-k 5	Vector retrieval from knowledge base
scripts/kb_klines.py resolve "<name>"	Natural name → canonical asset spec
scripts/kb_klines.py fetch --query "<name>" --interval <tf> --with-htf	Pull real OHLCV (+ HTF) from Mobius API
scripts/kb_klines.py parse --input <file>	Parse pasted CSV/JSON/Markdown → standard OHLCV
scripts/kb_klines.py analyze --input <ohlcv.json>	Extract features (swing/FVG/OB/sweep/displacement/structure). Add --format json to get structured features + suggested_overlay_items
scripts/kb_klines.py chart --query <name> --interval <tf>	Pull pure K-lines (no indicators) → panels payload (items empty, ready for LLM to fill with KB overlays)
scripts/kb_klines.py render --input <panels.json> --output <png>	Render panels JSON → PNG via Playwright + lightweight-charts (TradingView-grade chart)
scripts/kb_klines.py indicators --query <name> --interval <tf>	Default: fetch the SMC structural indicator (BOS/CHoCH, Order Blocks, FVGs, equal H/L, premium/discount zones, trailing pivot labels). Pass --inds <exact-name> only when the user explicitly named a specific indicator. Text output only, NOT rendered on chart.
scripts/kb_draw_annotation.py --json <path>	Render annotation JSON onto chart (PIL, for user-uploaded images)
scripts/kb_phase_b_to_c.py --input <analysis.json> --image <png> --output <annotated.png>	Convert analysis JSON → annotated image (one shot)
scripts/build_index.py	Build the vector index from knowledge_base/{concepts,cases}/ (one-time)
scripts/kb_doctor.py	Environment health check (run if anything's broken)

Common options for scripts/kb_retrieve.py:

• --top-k N (default 5)
• --type concept|case (filter by card type)
• --school <NAME> (e.g. --school ICT)
• --format markdown|json|compact

Setup (one-time)

cd /path/to/OpenMobius-skill       # the skill directory
bash install.sh                  # creates .venv, installs deps, builds index, checks fonts

The installer auto-registers the skill with Claude Code. If anything breaks (CJK label garbling, retrieval errors, missing index, etc.):

cd "${SKILL_DIR}" && .venv/bin/python scripts/kb_doctor.py

Examples (quick reference; full examples in each workflow doc)

Example 1 — Concept Q&A (no chart, no asset name):

User: "什么是 Fair Value Gap，怎么交易" → Read workflows/qna.md → run kb_retrieve → synthesize answer in Chinese with English technical terms

Example 2 — Chart analysis (with chart, identifiable asset):

User: [attaches BTC 4H chart] "分析一下当前行情" → Read workflows/analyze.md → identify asset → auto-fetch real OHLCV from Mobius → 5-section reply with precise prices + auto-annotated image

Example 3 — Annotation only (follow-up):

User: [after analysis JSON exists] "把刚才分析的画到图上" → Read workflows/annotate.md → call kb_phase_b_to_c.py → output annotated image

Example 4 — Kline analysis (no user-supplied chart):

User: "BTC 1h 现在怎么样" (or pastes a CSV of OHLCV) → Read workflows/klines.md → fetch/parse → analyze (extract features) → retrieve → generate fresh chart PNG → 5-section reply citing precise data-grounded prices + chart path