Skip to main content

incident-response

Incident triage, cascade prevention, and postmortem methodology. Use when handling production incidents, designing resilience patterns, or conducting chaos engineering exercises.

소스 정보

저장소
NickCrew/Claude-Cortex
최근 소스 활동
2026년 4월 23일 21:56
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
62
포크
15

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
3 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
incident-response
description
Incident triage, cascade prevention, and postmortem methodology. Use when handling production incidents, designing resilience patterns, or conducting chaos engineering exercises.
keywords
["incident response","outage","postmortem","triage","incident","response"]
# Incident Response Structured incident management from detection through postmortem, with resilience patterns for preventing and containing cascading failures. ## When to Use - Production incident in progress (outage, degradation, data loss) - Designing circuit breakers, bulkheads, or fallback strategies - Conducting or planning chaos engineering exercises - Writing or reviewing postmortem documents - Establishing on-call procedures and escalation paths Avoid when: - The issue is a development-time bug with no production impact - Designing general system architecture (use system-design instead) ## Quick Reference | Topic | Load reference | | --- | --- | | **Triage Framework** | `skills/incident-response/references/triage-framework.md` | | **Postmortem Patterns** | `skills/incident-response/references/postmortem-patterns.md` | ## Incident Response Workflow ### Phase 1: Detect - Alert fires or user report received - Confirm the issue is real (not a false positive) - Identify affected services and user impact scope ### Phase 2: Triage - Classify severity (P0-P3) - Assign incident commander - Open communication channel (war room, Slack channel) - Begin status page updates ### Phase 3: Contain - Stop the bleeding: rollback, feature flag, traffic shift - Prevent cascade: circuit breakers, load shedding, bulkhead isolation - Communicate: stakeholder updates every 15 minutes for P0/P1 ### Phase 4: Resolve - Implement fix (minimal viable fix first) - Validate in staging if time permits - Deploy with monitoring and rollback plan ready - Confirm recovery with metrics returning to baseline ### Phase 5: Postmortem - Document timeline within 48 hours - Conduct blameless review with all participants - Identify root cause and contributing factors - Assign action items with owners and deadlines - Update runbooks and alerting based on lessons learned ## Severity Framework | Level | Impact | Response Time | Examples | |-------|--------|---------------|---------| | **P0** | Complete outage, data loss, security breach | Immediate (< 5 min) | Service down, data corruption, credential leak | | **P1** | Major feature broken, significant user impact | < 30 min | Payment processing failed, auth broken for region | | **P2** | Degraded performance, partial feature loss | < 4 hours | Elevated latency, non-critical feature unavailable | | **P3** | Minor issue, workaround available | Next business day | UI glitch, slow report generation, cosmetic error | ## Output - Incident timeline and severity classification - Containment actions taken - Postmortem document with action items - Updated runbooks and alerting rules ## Common Mistakes - Skipping severity classification and treating everything as P0 - Making changes without a rollback plan - Forgetting to communicate status to stakeholders - Writing postmortems that assign blame instead of identifying systemic issues - Not following up on postmortem action items
GitHub에서 보기