메뉴
Narrative review of NPCs for consistency, writing quality, thematic coherence, and narrative depth.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Schema and rules for editing AI instructions
Check character counts and limits for Voyage World config files. Use when checking how much space is used, before adding large content, or when approaching size limits.
Schema and rules for creating locations
Schema and rules for editing settings
Schema and rules for creating traits
Schema and rules for creating triggers
| name | review-npcs |
| description | Narrative review of NPCs for consistency, writing quality, thematic coherence, and narrative depth. |
| context | fork |
| agent | review-npcs |
Perform a thorough narrative review of all NPCs. Run node .claude/scripts/review-npcs.js to get stripped narrative data, then analyze.
node .claude/scripts/review-npcs.js — outputs NPC narrative text with world-background and entity name listsstuff/npc-review.mdTimeline/dates: Cross-check ages, years, and historical events mentioned across NPCs. When two NPCs reference the same event, the details must match.
Relationship symmetry: When NPC A describes a relationship with NPC B, check that NPC B's entry reflects the relationship back. Flag one-way references where both NPCs exist.
Structural consistency: NPCs should follow a similar structure in basicInfo and hiddenInfo. Flag outliers that break the common pattern — these should conform, not diverge. Consistent structure is intentional and desirable.
Depth imbalance: Flag NPCs that are significantly underdeveloped compared to the average. Compare basicInfo and hiddenInfo length and detail level across the cast.
Tone/voice drift: Flag modern phrasing, anachronistic language, or anything that breaks the world's established Heian-era voice. Check against the world-background for tone.
Voice distinctiveness: Flag NPCs whose basicInfo or hiddenInfo could be swapped with another NPC and no one would notice. Each NPC should sound like a distinct person.
Cultural grounding: Flag anachronisms, misused Japanese terminology, titles or social roles that don't fit the setting, or cultural details that feel generic rather than researched.
One-way relationships: When NPC A mentions NPC B and both exist, check that B mentions A. Flag asymmetric relationships.
Missing names: When an NPC's prose mentions a named character who doesn't exist as an NPC, flag it only if that character feels like a significant absence — someone who should be in the world. Ignore minor or historical mentions.
NPC interconnectedness: Flag NPCs that exist in total isolation — no connections to any other NPC in the world. Every NPC should be woven into the web.
Secrets worth keeping: hiddenInfo should add genuine depth. Flag entries where hiddenInfo is mundane, predictable, or simply repeats what basicInfo already says.
Narrative tension: Flag clusters of allied NPCs with no internal friction, and rivals whose conflict has no meaningful stakes.
Personality vs backstory: Flag mismatches where personality traits contradict the character's story. A "cheerful" NPC with a purely tragic backstory and no levity needs reconciliation.
Hidden info quality: Flag redundancy between basicInfo and hiddenInfo. Hidden info should reveal, not restate.
Thematic coherence: Do NPCs collectively reinforce the world's core themes? Flag NPCs that feel thematically adrift — disconnected from what the world is about.
Power dynamics: Do hierarchies described in NPC relationships make sense? Flag when a subordinate sounds more powerful than their superior, or when authority structures are contradictory.
Archetype diversity: Flag when multiple NPCs fill the same narrative role. The cast should offer variety, not redundancy.
Moral complexity: Flag purely good or purely evil NPCs that lack nuance. Flag factions where every member shares the same moral stance.
Story potential: Flag NPCs who exist as set dressing with no hooks for player interaction or narrative development. Every NPC should offer something a player can engage with.
Group findings by domain. Within each domain, list findings with the NPC name(s) involved and a clear description of the issue. Prioritize the most significant findings first within each domain.