commenting-intent
Comment WHY code exists and non-obvious decisions, not WHAT code does (mechanics)
소스 정보
- 저장소
- obra/clank
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2025년 10월 7일 17:04
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 42
- 포크
- 26
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기- name
- Commenting Intent
- description
- Comment WHY code exists and non-obvious decisions, not WHAT code does (mechanics)
- when_to_use
- When adding comments to code. When explaining complex algorithms. When documenting decisions. When code review requests more comments. When over-commenting obvious code. When comments just restate code. When magic numbers exist. When non-obvious decisions made. When future maintainer would ask "why this way?".
- version
- 1.0.0
- languages
- all
# Commenting Intent
## Overview
Good comments explain WHY, not WHAT. Code already shows what it does. Comments should explain intent, decisions, and non-obvious reasoning.
**Core principle:** If the comment just restates the code, delete the comment or improve the code.
## Baseline Violation
**Agents comment mechanics (what code does):**
❌ **Over-commenting (baseline):**
```python
# Calculate subtotal by multiplying price and quantity for each item, then summing
subtotal = sum(item.price * item.quantity for item in items)
# Calculate tax amount based on the subtotal and tax rate
tax = subtotal * tax_rate
# Calculate final total by adding subtotal and tax
total = subtotal + tax
```
**Problem:** Comments just restate obvious code. No value added.
✅ **Comment intent only:**
```python
def calculate_total_price(items, tax_rate):
"""Calculate order total including tax."""
subtotal = sum(item.price * item.quantity for item in items)
tax = subtotal * tax_rate
return subtotal + tax # No comments needed - code is clear
```
## What to Comment
### 1. Non-Obvious Decisions
✅ **WHY you chose this approach:**
```python
def is_rate_limited(user_id, redis_client):
# Using Redis instead of in-memory to support distributed rate limiting
# across multiple app servers. Limit: 100 req/min per business requirements.
key = f"rate_limit:{user_id}"
current = redis_client.get(key)
if current is None:
redis_client.setex(key, 60, 1) # 60 sec TTL
return False
return int(current) >= 100 # Limit per product requirements doc
```
**Explains:** WHY Redis, WHY these limits, WHERE requirements came from.
### 2. Algorithms and Complex Logic
✅ **WHY this algorithm:**
```python
def find_user(users, email):
# Binary search requires sorted array. We sort by email on load
# to enable O(log n) lookups. Worth the upfront sort cost because
# lookups happen 100x more frequently than updates.
return binary_search(users, email)
```
**Explains:** WHY binary search, WHY pre-sorted, trade-off reasoning.
### 3. Magic Numbers and Constants
✅ **WHY these values:**
```python
MAX_RETRIES = 3 # Testing showed 3 retries handles 99.9% of transient failures
TIMEOUT_MS = 5000 # API SLA guarantees < 5sec response time
BATCH_SIZE = 100 # Larger batches caused memory issues in prod (incident #1234)
```
**Explains:** WHERE values came from (testing, SLA, incident).
### 4. Workarounds and Gotchas
✅ **WHY unusual code:**
```python
# WORKAROUND: Library bug #456 - must call reset() twice
# Fixed in v2.0 but we're on v1.8
client.reset()
client.reset()
```
**Warns future maintainer:** Unusual code has reason, link to issue.
## What NOT to Comment
### Don't Comment Obvious Code
❌ **Restates the code:**
```python
# Set user name to "John"
user.name = "John"
# Loop through items
for item in items:
# Process the item
process(item)
```
✅ **Let code speak:**
```python
user.name = "John"
for item in items:
process(item)
```
### Don't Comment Mechanics of Standard Patterns
❌ **Obvious pattern:**
```python
# Initialize search boundaries to cover entire array
left, right = 0, len(arr) - 1
# Continue searching while there's a valid range
while left <= right:
```
✅ **Comment intent only:**
```python
def binary_search(arr, target):
# Binary search for O(log n) performance on sorted array
left, right = 0, len(arr) - 1
while left <= right:
# ... implementation (standard pattern, no comments needed)
```
## The Comment Test
**For each comment, ask:**
1. **Does it explain WHY, not WHAT?**
- WHY: "Redis for distributed limiting" ✅
- WHAT: "Get value from Redis" ❌
2. **Would I understand without it?**
- If yes: Delete comment
- If no: Keep comment OR improve code clarity
3. **Does it add information beyond the code?**
- Yes: Keep it
- No: Delete it
## Quick Reference
| Comment This | Don't Comment This |
|--------------|---------------------|
| WHY you chose this approach | WHAT the code does |
| Non-obvious decisions | Obvious assignments |
| Magic number sources | Standard patterns |
| Algorithm trade-offs | Mechanics of loops/conditionals |
| Workarounds and gotchas | Self-evident operations |
| Business rule origins | Variable declarations |
## Real-World Impact
From baseline:
- Agents commented every line of simple price calculation (over-commenting)
- Comments restated code without adding value
- Missed opportunities to explain WHY (decisions, trade-offs)
**With this skill:** Comment intent, not mechanics.
## Integration with Other Skills
**For evergreen comments:** See skills/writing-evergreen-comments - no temporal context in comments
**For self-documenting code:** See skills/naming-variables - good names reduce need for comments
GitHub에서 보기