Skip to main content

condition-based-waiting

Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling for reliable async tests

소스 정보

저장소
obra/clank
최근 소스 활동
2025년 10월 6일 01:12
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
42
포크
26

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
Condition-Based Waiting
description
Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling for reliable async tests
when_to_use
When tests use setTimeout/sleep and are flaky or timing-dependent
version
1.0.0
languages
all
# Condition-Based Waiting ## Overview Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI. **Core principle:** Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes. ## When to Use ```dot digraph when_to_use { "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond]; "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond]; "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box]; "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box]; "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"]; "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"]; "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"]; } ``` **Use when:** - Tests have arbitrary delays (`setTimeout`, `sleep`, `time.sleep()`) - Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load) - Tests timeout when run in parallel - Waiting for async operations to complete **Don't use when:** - Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals) - Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout ## Core Pattern ```typescript // ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50)); const result = getResult(); expect(result).toBeDefined(); // ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined); const result = getResult(); expect(result).toBeDefined(); ``` ## Quick Patterns | Scenario | Pattern | |----------|---------| | Wait for event | `waitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))` | | Wait for state | `waitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')` | | Wait for count | `waitFor(() => items.length >= 5)` | | Wait for file | `waitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))` | | Complex condition | `waitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)` | ## Implementation Generic polling function: ```typescript async function waitFor<T>( condition: () => T | undefined | null | false, description: string, timeoutMs = 5000 ): Promise<T> { const startTime = Date.now(); while (true) { const result = condition(); if (result) return result; if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) { throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`); } await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms } } ``` See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (`waitForEvent`, `waitForEventCount`, `waitForEventMatch`) from actual debugging session. ## Common Mistakes **❌ Polling too fast:** `setTimeout(check, 1)` - wastes CPU **✅ Fix:** Poll every 10ms **❌ No timeout:** Loop forever if condition never met **✅ Fix:** Always include timeout with clear error **❌ Stale data:** Cache state before loop **✅ Fix:** Call getter inside loop for fresh data ## When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct ```typescript // Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200)); // Then: wait for timed behavior // 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified ``` **Requirements:** 1. First wait for triggering condition 2. Based on known timing (not guessing) 3. Comment explaining WHY ## Real-World Impact From debugging session (2025-10-03): - Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files - Pass rate: 60% → 100% - Execution time: 40% faster - No more race conditions
GitHub에서 보기