Skip to main content

pr-workflow

Reviews anomalib contributor workflow, PR title, branch naming, and quality gate expectations

소스 정보

저장소
open-edge-platform/anomalib
최근 소스 활동
2026년 4월 10일 11:50
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
6,327
포크
1,017

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
pr-workflow
description
Reviews anomalib contributor workflow, PR title, branch naming, and quality gate expectations
# Anomalib PR Workflow Review Use this skill when reviewing whether a change is ready for contribution and merge. ## Purpose and scope Use this skill for merge readiness, contributor workflow, CI expectations, PR title checks, and branch naming. ## Request changes when - the PR title does not follow the repository's Conventional Commit style; - branch naming does not match `<type>/<scope>/<description>`; - required quality gates, docs, tests, or changelog updates are missing; - workflow or security-sensitive changes are not reviewed to the repo's standards. ## Quality gates - Contributors are expected to run `prek run --all-files` and `pytest tests/` before finalizing a PR. - Review feedback should align with the project's configured checks in `pyproject.toml` and `.pre-commit-config.yaml`. - Security-sensitive changes should be reviewed with the repo's CI security tooling in mind: Bandit, CodeQL, Semgrep, Zizmor, Trivy, and Dependabot. ## PR titles and branch names - PR titles should follow Conventional Commits as described in `CONTRIBUTING.md`. - Branch names should follow `<type>/<scope>/<description>`. - Allowed types and scopes should match the repository's Commitizen configuration in `pyproject.toml`. ## Reviewer expectations - Ask for precise, actionable fixes grounded in repo policy rather than generic preferences. - Escalate missing tests, missing docs, missing changelog entries, or workflow/security risks before approval. - Be stricter when a PR changes CLI entrypoints, workflows, deployment, inferencers, or user-facing public APIs. ## Repo-grounded review anchors - `CONTRIBUTING.md` - `docs/source/markdown/guides/developer/contributing.md` - `docs/source/markdown/guides/developer/code_review_checklist.md` - `.pre-commit-config.yaml` - `pyproject.toml` - `SECURITY.md` ## Review prompts - Is the PR title valid for the eventual squash commit? - Are branch naming, changelog, tests, and docs in good shape for merge? - Do the requested changes line up with the project's existing CI and security gates? ## Reviewer checklist - Check PR title. - Check branch naming. - Check CI, test, doc, and changelog readiness. - Check workflow and security-sensitive files more strictly.
GitHub에서 보기