Skip to main content

canva-brand-check

Check a Canva design against a brand kit and report where it diverges — off-palette colors, non-brand fonts, logo misuse, and off-tone copy. Read-only; makes no changes. Use when the user asks "is this on brand", "check this against our brand kit", "do a brand review", "does this match our brand guidelines", or "brand-check my design".

소스 정보

저장소
openai/plugins
최근 소스 활동
2026년 8월 26일 20:49
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
7,387
포크
960

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
canva-brand-check
description
Check a Canva design against a brand kit and report where it diverges — off-palette colors, non-brand fonts, logo misuse, and off-tone copy. Read-only; makes no changes. Use when the user asks "is this on brand", "check this against our brand kit", "do a brand review", "does this match our brand guidelines", or "brand-check my design".
# Brand Checker Compare a design against the user's brand kit and report, point by point, where it follows the brand and where it drifts. This is a specialised, brand-aware version of `canva-design-feedback`: same read-only "read the design, then critique" core, but the rubric is the brand kit. It **never edits** the design. ## The brand-kit data gap — read this first `Canva:list-brand-kits` is documented to return brand kit **IDs, names, and thumbnails**. It may NOT return the machine-readable palette (hex values) and font families. Your approach depends on what you actually get back: - **If the kit exposes colors/fonts** → use those exact hex codes and font names as the rubric (precise check). - **If it only exposes a thumbnail/name** → you cannot do an exact hex/font match. Fall back to a **visual** comparison against the kit thumbnail, and ASK the user to paste their brand colors (hex) and fonts so you can check precisely. Be explicit that, without those, the color/font findings are approximate. Never invent brand colors or fonts. If you don't have the real values, say so. ## Reading the design's actual colors and fonts `Canva:get-design-content` returns text only — not colors or fonts. - A **read-only** editing transaction (`Canva:start-editing-transaction` → inspect → `Canva:cancel-editing-transaction`, always cancel) reliably gives element **text, positions, and sizes**. - **Colors and fonts are NOT reliably exposed** by the transaction — tested: it often returns only text + position + dimension, with no color/font attributes. So the **thumbnail is your primary evidence** for color and typography. Use any style data the payload happens to include, but never assert a design's hex or font as fact unless it was actually in the payload. Because both the brand kit (see the gap above) AND the design itself frequently lack machine-readable colors/fonts, brand-check is often a **visual** comparison (design thumbnail vs. brand-kit thumbnail) plus the user-supplied palette/fonts. Use `Canva:get-design-thumbnail` for logo placement and overall visual tone. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Resolve the design Short link → `Canva:resolve-shortlink`; full URL → extract ID; raw `D...` ID → use directly; otherwise ask. ### Step 2: Get the brand kit - `Canva:list-brand-kits`. If several, ask which one (or infer from team/context). - Capture whatever the kit exposes (name, thumbnail, and colors/fonts if present). - Apply the data-gap handling above. If scopes are missing (e.g. "Missing scopes: [brandkit:read]"), tell the user to disconnect and reconnect the Canva connector to refresh the token. ### Step 3: Read the design - `Canva:get-design-thumbnail` for visual/logo/tone. - Read-only transaction (start → inspect → cancel) for the actual colors and fonts in use. ### Step 4: Compare against the brand Check each dimension and mark **On brand / Off brand / Can't verify**: - **Color** — are fills/text/accents within the brand palette? Flag off-palette hexes (and the nearest brand color). - **Typography** — do fonts match brand fonts? Flag non-brand families and inconsistent sizing/weight usage. - **Logo** — present where expected, correct version, not stretched/recolored/crowded (visual check from thumbnail). - **Tone & copy** — does the wording match the brand voice the user describes? - **Consistency** — is brand application consistent across all pages? Use **Can't verify** honestly whenever the kit didn't expose the data and the user hasn't supplied it. ### Step 5: Report ``` ## Brand check — "<design title>" vs "<brand kit name>" Overall: ⚠️ Mostly on brand, 3 issues ### Off brand - [Color] Page 2 heading is #1A73E8 — not in palette. Nearest brand color: #0B5CD7. - [Font] Page 4 body uses Arial; brand body font is Inter. ### Can't verify (need input) - Brand kit didn't expose hex values. Paste your palette + fonts for an exact check, or confirm the colors above against your guidelines. ### On brand - Logo placement and cover treatment match the kit. ``` ### Step 6: Offer to fix Offer to correct the API-fixable issues via **`canva-edit-design`** — note that the API can change **text color** and font **size/weight/style**, but CANNOT change font **family** or background colors (those are manual in Canva; see `canva-edit-design`). ## Rules - Read-only: always `cancel-editing-transaction` after inspecting. Never commit. - Never fabricate brand values — use the kit's real data or what the user provides, otherwise mark **Can't verify**. - Always name the specific page/element and the offending value vs. the brand value. - Distinguish hard violations (wrong logo, off-palette color) from soft ones (slightly inconsistent spacing).
GitHub에서 보기