Skip to main content

food-figure

Comprehensive figure system for food & nutrition manuscripts: analyzes the user's data, recommends the best figure(s) to make, then produces submission-grade graphics in Python or R at the target journal's spec. Handles all common scientific figure types (bar/box/violin, line/kinetic, scatter/regression, Bland–Altman, radar/sensory, chromatograms, TPA/rheology, dose–response, survival, PCA/PLS-DA, heatmaps/clustering, forest, microscopy plates, multi-panel). Use to make, create, design, revise, audit, or recommend figures/charts/plots for a food-science paper, or to work out what to plot from a dataset. If Python or R isn't chosen, ask once and remember it. Triggers: make a figure, create a figure, design a figure, what figure should I make, recommend a chart, plot my data, analyze my data and plot it, chart my results, food science figure, journal figure, scientific plotting, data visualization for a manuscript.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition
최근 소스 활동
2026년 8월 9일 00:44
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
32
포크
3

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
46 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
food-figure
description
Comprehensive figure system for food & nutrition manuscripts: analyzes the user's data, recommends the best figure(s) to make, then produces submission-grade graphics in Python or R at the target journal's spec. Handles all common scientific figure types (bar/box/violin, line/kinetic, scatter/regression, Bland–Altman, radar/sensory, chromatograms, TPA/rheology, dose–response, survival, PCA/PLS-DA, heatmaps/clustering, forest, microscopy plates, multi-panel). Use to make, create, design, revise, audit, or recommend figures/charts/plots for a food-science paper, or to work out what to plot from a dataset. If Python or R isn't chosen, ask once and remember it. Triggers: make a figure, create a figure, design a figure, what figure should I make, recommend a chart, plot my data, analyze my data and plot it, chart my results, food science figure, journal figure, scientific plotting, data visualization for a manuscript.
metadata
{"version":"2.3.0","verified":"2026-07","related_skills":["journal-selector","food-paper","food-research"],"references":["references/chart-types.md","references/data-to-figure.md","references/design-principles.md","references/figure-contract.md","references/qa-checklist.md","references/python-guide.md","references/r-guide.md","references/food-recipes.md","references/journal-specs.md","references/color-palettes.md","references/figure-provenance.md","references/figure-story-design.md","references/experimental-flow.md","references/ai-image-generation.md"],"examples":["examples/python_food_figures.py","examples/r_food_figures.R"],"scripts":["scripts/analyze_data.py","scripts/backend_pref.py"]}
# Food-Figure — Data-Driven Figure System for Food & Nutrition Science Turn a dataset (or a described result) into the right submission-grade figure. **The chart serves the scientific logic; polish is subordinate to making the core conclusion clear, defensible, and reviewable.** Original work; architecture informed by open community figure skills (see the repo README Acknowledgements). Load reference files **as needed** (progressive disclosure) — don't read them all up front. The map is in the frontmatter `references` list. ## Workflow ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Data or described result] --> B[1. Analyze the data<br/>scripts/analyze_data.py -> profile] B --> C[2. Recommend figures<br/>references/data-to-figure.md] C --> D[3. Figure contract<br/>references/figure-contract.md] D --> E{Backend?} E -- unknown --> Eq[Ask 'Python or R?' once<br/>scripts/backend_pref.py] E -- known --> F Eq --> F[4. Render<br/>python-guide.md OR r-guide.md + food-recipes.md] F --> G[5. Export at journal spec<br/>references/journal-specs.md] G --> H[6. QA<br/>references/qa-checklist.md] H --> OUT[Journal-ready SVG/PDF/TIFF + editable source] ``` ### 1 — Analyze the data If the user supplies a data file (CSV/TSV/Excel) or table, profile it first: run `scripts/analyze_data.py <file>` to get, per column, the type (numeric/categorical/datetime), cardinality, missingness, distribution summary, and the detected structure (grouping factors, repeated measures, time/dose axis, wide sensory/composition matrix). If the user only describes a result, elicit the same: what varies, what's measured, n, and the error type. See `references/data-to-figure.md`. ### 2 — Recommend the figure(s) From the profile, propose the **best** figure type(s) with a one-line rationale each, and say what each would show. Prefer the figure that makes the paper's claim most directly; note honest alternatives. The decision rules and a full catalog are in `references/data-to-figure.md` and `references/chart-types.md`. Never force a chart the data can't support (e.g. bar-of-means where a distribution matters → box/violin + points). ### 3 — Figure contract + provenance (before code) Fix the conclusion, evidence logic, export needs (target journal), and review risks (`references/figure-contract.md`). Open a **figure trace card** (`references/figure-provenance.md`): the real data source, the script that makes the figure, what it shows, and the claim it supports — so the plotted values match the reported statistics. Choose the palette by data type (`references/color-palettes.md`). For a dense Figure 1/2-style request, first design the complete evidence story with `references/figure-story-design.md`: experimental sequence, evidence hierarchy, non-redundant panel questions, source-data map, opening schematic, and an integrated synthesis panel. Do not start by filling a grid with chart types. ### 4 — Backend gate (blocking) - **Data figures → Python or R (always).** Resolve the backend by priority: explicit request → language of the user's input files/data → saved preference (`python scripts/backend_pref.py get`) → ask once ("Python or R? I'll remember this") and save it (`backend_pref.py set python|r`). The chosen backend does **all** data graphics, preview, and export; the other may only help with data prep/conversion. - **AI image route (opt-in, schematics only).** **Only if the user explicitly asks** to generate the image with **Gemini, ChatGPT, or Claude** (or another named image model) — and **only for conceptual visuals** (mechanism diagrams, graphical abstracts, process schematics) — use that model instead. **Never** use an AI image model for a data-bearing figure, and never let it invent data. See `references/ai-image-generation.md`. ### 5 — Render & export Use the selected backend's guide (`python-guide.md` = matplotlib/seaborn/ subplot_mosaic/statsmodels; `r-guide.md` = ggplot2/patchwork/ComplexHeatmap/ ggrepel + svglite/cairo_pdf/ragg) plus `food-recipes.md` for the food/nutrition figure types. **Start from the template library** — `examples/python_food_figures.py` or `examples/r_food_figures.R` — which has a ready function for every figure type; adapt it to the user's data. Export **vector** (PDF/SVG) for line/bar/scatter and **TIFF (LZW)** at the journal DPI for raster/microscopy; keep an editable source. Pull DPI, column width, font, and format from the target journal via `references/journal-specs.md`; if no journal is set, default to 300 dpi, ~90/190 mm widths, TIFF+PDF, Arial 7–9 pt. ### 6 — QA Run `references/qa-checklist.md` before delivering (error bars defined + n; statistics shown consistently; axes honest; colorblind-safe; labels legible at final size; matches journal spec; every panel cited). **Privacy:** any code or legend you hand back must use **relative paths**, never local machine paths — scan with `python3 scripts/privacy_scan.py` (see `food-paper/references/privacy-and-confidentiality.md`). ### Deliver Hand back, per figure: the file(s) (vector + raster), the **figure trace card**, a **self-contained caption** (APA 7.0 or the journal's style — see `references/figure-provenance.md`), and the plotting code. For a `.tex` build, include the `\includegraphics` environment. ## Modes - **recommend** — analyze data and suggest figures, no rendering yet. - **make** (default) — full pipeline to a rendered, exported figure + caption + trace card. - **revise / audit** — critique or fix an existing figure against the QA checklist and journal spec. - **multi-panel** — compose labelled panels (a, b, c) that share a logical thread. - **figure-story** — design and render an 8–12 panel journal-style evidence narrative from experimental design through primary results, diagnostics, robustness, and an integrated conclusion. - **schematic** — a graphical abstract / mechanism diagram: Python/R by default, or the opt-in AI-image route (`references/ai-image-generation.md`) if the user asks. ## Scope Reproducible, code-generated, submission-grade scientific figures for food & nutrition. Not for dashboards or Illustrator/Figma-first artwork. A schematic/graphical-abstract (mechanism diagram) is a drawing task: keep it in Python/R by default, or — only if the user explicitly asks — generate it with an AI image model (Gemini/ChatGPT/Claude) per `references/ai-image-generation.md`. Data figures are always Python/R. ## Handoff Called by `food-paper`'s `viz_designer` at the journal spec; figures feed the manuscript's Results.
GitHub에서 보기